Objectives Tranexamic acid might help control bleeding during surgery because of antifibrinolytic characteristics. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of systemic tranexamic acid compared to control in blood loss, operative time, and surgical field and incidence of postoperative emesis and thromboembolism in endoscopic sinus surgery. Methods Two authors independently searched six databases (PubMed, SCOPUS, Embase, the Web of Science, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane database) from their inception to July 2018. The included studies compared perioperative tranexamic acid administration (treatment group) with a placebo, and the outcomes of interest were intraoperative morbidities, including surgical time, operative bleeding, and hypotension; postoperative morbidities such as nausea and vomiting; and coagulation profiles. Results Seven studies comprising 562 participants were reviewed in this study. Operative time (standardized mean difference (SMD) = −0.60; 95% confidence interval (CI)[−0.93, −0.29]) and intraoperative blood loss (SMD = −0.66; 95% CI [−0.86, −0.46]) were statistically lower in the treatment group than placebo group; and the quality of the surgical field (SMD = −0.80; 95% CI [−1.12; −0.48]) and surgeon satisfaction (SMD = 1.74; 95% CI [1.36; 2.13]) were statistically higher in the treatment group than the placebo group. By contrast, there were no significant differences in the hemodynamic (SMD = 0.08; 95% CI [−0.20; 0.37]) and coagulation profiles (SMD = −0.18; 95% CI [−0.42, 0.07]) of the two groups. Additionally, tranexamic acid had no significant effect on emetic or thrombotic events compared to placebo. Conclusion This meta‐analysis showed that the systemic administration of tranexamic acid could decrease operative time and blood loss intraoperatively, increasing the satisfaction of surgeons. It did not provoke intraoperative hemodynamic instability, postoperative emetic events, or coagulation profile abnormality. Only a small number of studies were enrolled, so further trials are needed to confirm the results of this study. Laryngoscope, 129:800–807, 2019

We evaluated the effect of silicone stent use during endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy on postoperative morbidities in comparison with versus without a silicone stent. Two authors independently searched six databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, the Web of Science, the Cochrane library, and Google Scholar) from inception of article collection to July 2017. The analysis included prospective randomized studies that compared intraoperative silicone stent insertion (silicone group) with no application of a silicone stent (control group), in which the outcomes of interest were success rate (lacrimal passage patent check with syringing, symptom relief, or endoscopic confirmation of fluorescein dye from the opening of Hasner’s valve) and morbidities (e.g., postoperative bleeding, rhinostomy closure, granulation tissue, synechia, and eyelid problems) after certain follow-up periods (over 10 weeks). Nine studies involving a total of 587 participants were included. Functional success rates tended to be higher in the silicone group than in the control, but there was no statistically significant difference in success rates (odds ratio, 1.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.77 to 2.73). According to the surgical type such as mucosal removal and mucosal flap surgery, the results from types didn’t demonstrate any significant effect, but the mucosal flap technique seemed to be more beneficial. Regarding postoperative morbidities, although the outcomes of the groups did not present any statistically significant difference, eyelid problems and postoperative bleeding tended to occur more frequently in the silicone group, but rhinostomy closure tended to occur more frequently in the control group. Success and morbidity rates showed no difference between the silicone stent group and control group in the meta-analysis. However, additional analyses revealed that the success rate of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy using silicone intubation with mucosal flap has shown an improving trend, and morbidities such as granulation and synechia showed decreasing trends compared with the group without silicone intubation.

Objectives Dexmedetomidine has sympatholytic, sedative, anesthetic, and analgesic effects, as well as vasoconstrictive effects, which may help prevent hypotension under general anesthesia. This meta-analysis aimed to perform a systematic review of the literature and investigate the effect of dexmedetomidine on perioperative morbidity following nasal surgery and its adverse effects. Data Sources MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and the Cochrane database. Review Methods Two authors independently searched the databases from their inception to March 2017. Studies were selected that compared perioperative dexmedetomidine administration (dexmedetomidine groups) with a placebo or remifentanil (control groups) with regard to intraoperative morbidity, including surgical time, bleeding amount, hypotension, and bradycardia during operation, and postoperative morbidity, such as emergence agitation, nausea and vomiting, and sedation after operation. Results Surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, dose of inhaled anesthetic gas, dose of fentanyl, postoperative pain, and incidence of emergence agitation were significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine group versus the placebo group. In contrast, there were no significant differences in intraoperative hemodynamic stability and postoperative residual sedation and nausea and vomiting between groups. Additionally, compared with remifentanil (a currently widely used agent), dexmedetomidine was superior in view of postoperative pain and intraoperative blood pressure control. Conclusion This meta-analysis shows that the systemic administration of dexmedetomidine can decrease surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, and doses of intraoperative inhaled anesthetic gas and fentanyl as compared with placebo. It can also decrease postoperative pain and incidence of the emergence agitation. Due to the small number of studies, further clinical trials are needed to confirm these results.

Perioperative administration of dexmedetomidine can provide pain and agitation relief without side effects in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy. Considering the high heterogeneity of results within some parameters; however, further clinical trials with robust research methodology should be conducted to confirm the results of this study. Laryngoscope, 128:E184-E193, 2018.

Objectives This study evaluated the efficacy of piezoelectric osteotomy in reducing oedema and ecchymosis during rhinoplasty via a systematic review with meta‐analysis. Design and setting Two authors independently searched the referenced databases. PubMed, Embase, SCOPUS, the Web of Science, the Cochrane library and Google Scholar databases were systematically searched from inception to January 2019. Participants Sufficient data were retrieved for a meta‐analysis of six trials with a total of 327 patients. Main outcome measures They included studies that compared piezoelectric osteotomy (treatment groups) with conventional osteotomy (control group). The outcomes of interest were operative time, mucosal injury, oedema, ecchymosis and postoperative pain. Baseline study characteristics, quality of study, numbers of patients in the treatment and control groups and outcomes were extracted. Results Intraoperative mucosal injury was significantly lower in the treatment group vs the control group, but operative time was longer in the treatment group. Eyelid oedema and ecchymosis in the first seven days postoperatively were statistically decreased in the treatment group vs the control group. In addition, pain in the first three days postoperatively was statistically decreased in the treatment group vs the control group. However, in a subgroup analysis according to osteotomy visibility in the control group (blind osteotomy vs osteotomy under direct vision), there was no significant difference in oedema and ecchymosis between treatment and osteotomy under direct vision. Conclusions Piezoelectric osteotomy during rhinoplasty can reduce eyelid oedema and eyelid ecchymosis compared to conventional osteotomy. However, piezoelectric osteotomy had no significant advantages in terms of postoperative oedema and ecchymosis compared to osteotomy under direct vision.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract