Plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) are specialized in rapid and massive secretion of type I interferon (IFN-α/β) in response to foreign nucleic acids. Combined with their antigen presentation capacity, this powerful functionality enables pDCs to orchestrate innate and adaptive immune responses. pDCs combine features of both lymphocytes and classical dendritic cells and display unique molecular adaptations to nucleic acid sensing and IFN production. In the decade since the identification of the pDC as a distinct immune cell type, our understanding of its molecular underpinnings and role in immunity has progressed rapidly. Here we review select aspects of pDC biology including cell fate establishment and plasticity, specific molecular mechanisms of pDC function, and the role of pDCs in T cell responses, antiviral immunity, and autoimmune diseases. Important unresolved questions remain in these areas, promising exciting times in pDC research for years to come.

Summary The interferon-producing plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) share common progenitors with antigen-presenting classical dendritic cells (cDCs), yet they possess distinct morphology and molecular features resembling those of lymphocytes. It is unclear whether the unique cell fate of pDCs is actively maintained in the steady state. We report that the deletion of transcription factor E2-2 from mature peripheral pDCs caused their spontaneous differentiation into cells with cDC properties. This included the loss of pDC markers, increase in MHC class II expression and T cell priming capacity, acquisition of dendritic morphology and induction of cDC signature genes. Genome-wide chromatin immunoprecipitation revealed direct binding of E2-2 to key pDC-specific and lymphoid genes, as well as to certain genes enriched in cDCs. Thus, E2-2 actively maintains the cell fate of mature pDCs and opposes the “default” cDC fate, in part through direct regulation of lineage-specific gene expression programs.

The IGF/mTOR pathway, which is modulated by nutrients, growth factors, energy status and cellular stress regulates aging in various organisms. SIRT1 is a NAD+ dependent deacetylase that is known to regulate caloric restriction mediated longevity in model organisms, and has also been linked to the insulin/IGF signaling pathway. Here we investigated the potential regulation of mTOR signaling by SIRT1 in response to nutrients and cellular stress. We demonstrate that SIRT1 deficiency results in elevated mTOR signaling, which is not abolished by stress conditions. The SIRT1 activator resveratrol reduces, whereas SIRT1 inhibitor nicotinamide enhances mTOR activity in a SIRT1 dependent manner. Furthermore, we demonstrate that SIRT1 interacts with TSC2, a component of the mTOR inhibitory-complex upstream to mTORC1, and regulates mTOR signaling in a TSC2 dependent manner. These results demonstrate that SIRT1 negatively regulates mTOR signaling potentially through the TSC1/2 complex.

Exit of mature pDCs from the bone marrow requires the transcription factor Runx2, in part via Runx2-driven expression of CCR5.

Sirt1 is an NAD+-dependent deacetylase that plays a role in cellular processes such as transcriptional regulation, stress response, longevity and apoptosis. Sirt1 deacetylates histone proteins and certain transcription factors such as p53, CTIP2 (chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter-transcription factor-interacting protein 2), FOXO (forkhead box O) and NF-kappaB (nuclear factor kappaB). To identify potential Sirt1-interacting factors, we performed a yeast two-hybrid screen. The screen identified TLE1 (transducin-like enhancer of split-1) as a possible Sirt1-interacting factor, which was then confirmed by co-immunoprecipitation. TLE1 is a non-DNA binding co-repressor for several transcriptional factors including NF-kappaB. We have demonstrated using co-transfection assays that Sirt1 and TLE1 repress NF-kappaB activity. The catalytic mutant of Sirt1, Sirt1-H363Y, and the N-terminal Sirt1 fragment (amino acids 1-270) also show similar repression activity, suggesting that the deacetylase activity of Sirt1 may not be critical for its effect on NF-kappaB activity. Furthermore, analysis in Sirt1-null MEFs (murine embryonic fibroblasts) and HeLa cells stably expressing siRNA (small interfering RNA) specific to Sirt1 or TLE1 demonstrate that both Sirt1 and TLE1 are required for negative regulation of NF-kappaB activity. Taken together, these results suggest that the interaction between Sirt1 and TLE1 is important for mediating repression of NF-kappaB activity.