Conclusion.3 T MRI after intratympanic injection of gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) is more useful for the diagnosis of endolymphatic hydrops compared with the glycerol test and electrocochleography (ECoG).Objective:To investigate the relationship between 3 T MRI after intratympanic injection of GBCA, the glycerol test, and ECoG in patients with Meniere's disease (MD).Methods:A total of 20 patients with MD were evaluated. Diluted gadodiamide (a gadolinium-based contrast agent) was administered to the bilateral tympanic cavity by injection through the tympanic membrane. After 24 h, the endolymphatic hydrops was evaluated by a 3.0 T MR scanner. To investigate cochlear hydrops, the glycerol test and ECoG were carried out in all patients.Results:A positive result was observed in 11 patients (55%) in the glycerol test and in 12 patients (60%) by ECoG. The incidence of positive findings when evaluating the same patients with both the glycerol test and ECoG increased to 75%. Nineteen of 20 (95%) patients showed positive results for 3 T MRI.

Conclusions:With full insertion with a long electrode, hearing preservation can be achieved even in the presence of a long electrode covering the residual hearing region.Objectives:Advances in developing new atraumatic concepts of electrode design as well as surgical technique have enabled hearing preservation after cochlear implantation surgery, and EAS (electric acoustic stimulation) accompanied with hearing preservation is a new trend for patients with residual hearing at the lower frequencies. However, full insertion with a long/medium electrode and hearing preservation is still a challenging field that calls for discussion.Method:In this study, round window insertion, an atraumatic electrode, and dexamethasone administration were used and atraumaticity (hearing preservation and conservation of vestibular function) was evaluated with full insertion of the electrode.Results:Postoperative evaluation after full insertion of the electrodes showed that hearing at low frequencies was well preserved in all five cases. Combined postoperative imaging with the referential tonotopic map confirmed achievement of full insertion and indicated the corresponding frequencies and the depth of the electrode. Achievement of atraumaticity of round window insertion in the present cases was confirmed from the viewpoint of the minimal drilling time as well as the preserved vestibular function.

Mutations in WFS1 are reported to be responsible for two conditions with distinct phenotypes; DFNA6/ 14/38 and autosomal recessive Wolfram syndrome. They differ in their associated symptoms and inheritance mode, and although their most common clinical symptom is hearing loss, it is of different types. While DNFA6/14/38 is characterized by low frequency sensorineural hearing loss (LFSNHL), in contrast, Wolfram syndrome is associated with various hearing severities ranging from normal to profound hearing loss that is dissimilar to LFSNHL (Pennings et al. 2002). To confirm whether within non-syndromic hearing loss patients WFS1 mutations are found restrictively in patients with LFSNHL and to summarize the mutation spectrum of WFS1 found in Japanese, we screened 206 Japanese autosomal dominant and 64 autosomal recessive (sporadic) non-syndromic hearing loss probands with various severities of hearing loss. We found three independent autosomal dominant families associated with two different WFS1 mutations, A716T and E864K, previously detected in families with European ancestry. Identification of the same mutations in independent families with different racial backgrounds suggests that both sites are likely to be mutational hot spots. All three families with WFS1 mutations in this study showed a similar phenotype, LFSNHL, as in previous reports. In this study, onethird (three out of nine) autosomal dominant LFSNHL families had mutations in the WFS1 gene, indicating that in non-syndromic hearing loss WFS1 is restrictively and commonly found within autosomal dominant LFSNHL families.

Discovery of deafness genes has progressed but clinical application lags because of the genetic heterogeneity. To establish clinical application strategy, we reviewed the frequency and spectrum of mutations found in Japanese hearing loss patients and compared them to those in populations of European ancestry. Screening revealed that in Japanese, mutations in GJB2, SLC26A4, and CDH23, and the mitochondrial 12S rRNA are the major causes of hearing loss. Also, mutations in KCNQ4, TECTA, COCH, WFS1, CRYM, COL9A3, and KIAA1199 were found in independent autosomal dominant families. Interestingly, spectrums of GJB2, SLC26A4, and CDH23 mutations in Japanese were quite different from those in Europeans. Simultaneous screening of multiple deafness mutations based on the mutation spectrum of a corresponding population using an Invader panel revealed that approximately 30% of subjects could be diagnosed. This assay will enable us to detect deafness mutations in an efficient and practical manner in the clinical platform. We conclude that specific racial populations may have unique deafness gene epidemiologies; therefore, ethnic background should be considered when genetic testing is performed. Simultaneous examination of multiple mutations based on a population's spectrum may be appropriate and effective for detecting deafness genes, facilitating precise clinical diagnosis, appropriate counseling, and proper management.

Three-dimensional, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (3D-FLAIR) MRI showed that the gadodiamide successfully penetrated the round window membrane, entering the perilymphatic space and delineating the gadodiamide-enhanced perilymphatic and gadodiamide-negative endolymphatic spaces of the inner ear. All the patients with MD showed a reduced gadodiamide-enhanced area representing the perilymphatic space, and the quantitative ratio was 0.15 to 0.85. Furthermore, endolymphatic hydrops was also demonstrated in the patient with atypical MD who had fluctuating low frequency sensorineural hearing loss without vertigo.