No abstract

We have previously shown that Y box-binding protein-1 (YB-1) binds preferentially to cisplatin-modified Y box sequences. Based on structural and biochemical data, we predicted that this protein binds single-stranded nucleic acids. In the present study we confirmed the prediction and also discovered some unexpected functional features of YB-1. We found that the cold shock domain of the protein is necessary but not sufficient for double-stranded DNA binding while the C-tail domain interacts with both single-stranded DNA and RNA independently of the cold shock domain. In an in vitro translation system the C-tail domain of the protein inhibited translation but the cold shock domain did not. Both in vitro pull-down and in vivo co-immunoprecipitation assays revealed that YB-1 can form a homodimer. Deletion analysis mapped the C-tail domain of the protein as the region of homodimerization. We also characterized an intrinsic 3'-->5' DNA exonuclease activity of the protein. The region between residues 51 and 205 of its 324-amino acid extent is required for full exonuclease activity. Our findings suggest that YB-1 functions in regulating DNA/RNA transactions and that these actions involve different domains.

Cisplatin is one of the most potent and widely used anti-cancer agents in the treatment of various solid tumors. However, the development of resistance to cisplatin is a major obstacle in clinical treatment. Several mechanisms are thought to be involved in cisplatin resistance, including decreased intracellular drug accumulation, increased levels of cellular thiols, increased nucleotide excision-repair activity and decreased mismatch-repair activity. In general, the molecules responsible for each mechanism are upregulated in cisplatin-resistant cells; this indicates that the transcription factors activated in response to cisplatin might play crucial roles in drug resistance. It is known that the tumor-suppressor proteins p53 and p73, and the oncoprotein c-Myc, which function as transcription factors, influence cellular sensitivity to cisplatin. So far, we have identified several transcription factors involved in cisplatin resistance, including Y-box binding protein-1 (YB-1), CCAAT-binding transcription factor 2 (CTF2), activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4), zinc-finger factor 143 (ZNF143) and mitochondrial transcription factor A (mtTFA). Two of these-YB-1 and ZNF143-lack the high-mobility group (HMG) domain and can bind preferentially to cisplatin-modified DNA in addition to HMG domain proteins or DNA repair proteins, indicating that these transcription factors may also participate in DNA repair. In this review, we summarize the mechanisms of cisplatin resistance and focus on transcription factors involved in the genomic response to cisplatin.

No abstract

We have isolated two overlapping genomic clones that contain the 5 -terminal portion of the human vacuolar H ؉ -ATPase c subunit (ATP6L) gene. The sequence preceding the transcription initiation site, which is GCrich, contains four GC boxes and one Oct1-binding site, but there is no TATA box or CCAAT box. In vivo footprint analysis in human cancer cells shows that two GC boxes and the Oct1-binding site are occupied by Sp1 and Oct1, respectively. We show here that treatment with anticancer agents enhances ATP6L expression. Although cisplatin did not induce ATP6L promoter activity, it altered ATP6L mRNA stability. On the other hand, the DNA topoisomerase II inhibitor, TAS-103, strongly induced promoter activity, and this effect was completely eradicated when a mutation was introduced into the Oct1-binding site. Treatment with TAS-103 increased the levels of both Sp1/Sp3 and Oct1 in nuclear extracts. Cooperative binding of Sp1 and Oct1 to the promoter is required for promoter activation by TAS-103. Incubation of a labeled oligonucleotide probe encompassing the ؊73/؊68 GC box and ؊64/؊57 Oct1-binding site with a nuclear extract from drug-treated KB cells yielded higher levels of the specific DNA-protein complex than an extract of untreated cells. Thus, the two transcription factors, Sp1 and Oct1 interact, in an adaptive response to DNA damage, by up-regulating expression of the vacuolar H ؉ -ATPase genes. Furthermore, combination of the vacuolar H ؉ -ATPase (V-ATPase) inhibitor, bafilomycin A1, with TAS-103 enhanced apoptosis of KB cells with an associated increase in caspase-3 activity. Our data suggest that the induction of V-ATPase expression is an anti-apoptotic defense, and V-ATPase inhibitors in combination with low-dose anticancer agents may provide a new therapeutic approach.Tumor cells possess high glycolytic activity, and rapid growth produces acidic metabolites. Moreover, tumor cells often exist in an hypoxic microenvironment lower in pH than that of surrounding normal cells. Hence, proton extrusion may be up-regulated to protect tumor cells from acidosis. Four major types of pH regulators have been identified in tumor cells as follows: sodium-proton exchangers, bicarbonate transporters, proton-lactate symporters, and proton pumps. The vacuolar H ϩ -ATPase (V-ATPase) 1 is ubiquitously expressed in eukaryotic cells (1-6), not only in vacuolar membranes but also in plasma membrane (7-9). It is a multisubunit enzyme composed of a membrane sector and a cytosolic catalytic sector (10); it pumps protons from the cytoplasm to the lumen of the vacuole and also regulates cytosolic pH. V-ATPase is active in the plasma membrane of human tumor cells (11), and V-ATPase genes are considered "housekeeping genes." However, cytosolic pH is critical for the cytotoxicity of anticancer agents (12), and cellular acidosis is thought to be a trigger for apoptosis and to play a role in drug resistance. Therefore, understanding the mechanisms regulating tumor acidity is important for developing new approaches to cancer chemothera...