In most algae, the chloroplast division rate is held constant to maintain the proper number of chloroplasts per cell. By contrast, land plants evolved cell and chloroplast differentiation systems in which the size and number of chloroplasts change along with their respective cellular function by regulation of the division rate. Here, we show that PLASTID DIVISION (PDV) proteins, land plant-specific components of the division apparatus, determine the rate of chloroplast division. Overexpression of PDV proteins in the angiosperm Arabidopsis thaliana and the moss Physcomitrella patens increased the number but decreased the size of chloroplasts; reduction of PDV levels resulted in the opposite effect. The level of PDV proteins, but not other division components, decreased during leaf development, during which the chloroplast division rate also decreased. Exogenous cytokinins or overexpression of the cytokinin-responsive transcription factor CYTOKININ RESPONSE FACTOR2 increased the chloroplast division rate, where PDV proteins, but not other components of the division apparatus, were upregulated. These results suggest that the integration of PDV proteins into the division machinery enabled land plant cells to change chloroplast size and number in accord with the fate of cell differentiation.

Chloroplasts have evolved from a cyanobacterial endosymbiont and been retained for more than 1 billion years by coordinated chloroplast division in multiplying eukaryotic cells. Chloroplast division is performed by ring structures at the division site, encompassing both the inside and the outside of the two envelopes. A part of the division machinery is derived from the cyanobacterial cytokinetic activity based on the FtsZ protein. In contrast, other parts of the division machinery involve proteins specific to eukaryotes, including a member of the dynamin family. Each member of the dynamin family is involved in the division or fusion of a distinct eukaryotic membrane system. To gain insight into the kind of ancestral dynamin protein and eukaryotic membrane activity that evolved to regulate chloroplast division, we investigated the functions of the dynamin proteins that are most closely related to chloroplast division proteins. These proteins in the amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum and Arabidopsis thaliana localize at the sites of cell division, where they are involved in cytokinesis. Our results suggest that the dynamin for chloroplast division is derived from that involved in eukaryotic cytokinesis. Therefore, the chloroplast division machinery is a mixture of bacterial and eukaryotic cytokinesis components, with the latter a key factor in the synchronization of endosymbiotic cell division with host cell division, thus helping to establish the permanent endosymbiotic relationship.

Chloroplasts evolved from a cyanobacterial endosymbiont, and chloroplast division requires the formation of an FtsZ division ring, which is descended from the cytokinetic machinery of cyanobacteria. As in bacteria, the positioning of the chloroplast FtsZ ring is regulated by the proteins MinD and MinE. However, chloroplast division also involves mechanisms invented by the eukaryotic host cell. Here we show that a plant-specific protein MULTIPLE CHLOROPLAST DIVISION SITE 1 (MCD1) regulates FtsZ ring positioning in Arabidopsis thaliana chloroplasts. Our analyses show that both MCD1 and MinD are required for chloroplast division, localizing at the division sites and punctate structures dispersed on the inner envelope. MinD overexpression inhibited FtsZ ring formation whereas MCD1 overexpression did not. Localization studies suggest that MCD1 is required for MinD localization to regulate FtsZ ring formation. Furthermore, the interaction between MCD1 and MinD in yeast two-hybrid assays suggests that MCD1 recruits MinD by direct interaction. These results point out differences in the MinD localization mechanism between chloroplasts and bacterial model systems and suggest that the plant cell evolved a component to modulate the cyanobacteria-derived Min system so as to regulate chloroplast FtsZ ring positioning.

Background: Plastids arose from a free-living cyanobacterial endosymbiont and multiply by binary division as do cyanobacteria. Plastid division involves nucleus-encoded homologs of cyanobacterial division proteins such as FtsZ, MinD, MinE, and ARC6. However, homologs of many other cyanobacterial division genes are missing in plant genomes and proteins of host eukaryotic origin, such as a dynamin-related protein, PDV1 and PDV2 are involved in the division process. Recent identification of plastid division proteins has started to elucidate the similarities and differences between plastid division and cyanobacterial cell division. To further identify new proteins that are required for plastid division, we characterized previously and newly isolated plastid division mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana.

No abstract

We characterized the pcb2 (pale-green and chlorophyll b reduced 2) mutant. We found through electron microscopic observation that chloroplasts of pcb2 mesophyll cells lacked distinctive grana stacks. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis showed that the pcb2 mutant accumulated divinyl chlorophylls, and the relative amount of divinyl chlorophyll b was remarkably less than that of divinyl chlorophyll a. The responsible gene was mapped in an area of 190 kb length at the upper arm of the 5th chromosome, and comparison of DNA sequences revealed a single nucleotide substitution causing a nonsense mutation in At5g18660. Complementation analysis confirmed that the wild-type of this gene suppressed the phenotypes of the mutation. Antisense transformants of the gene also accumulated divinyl chlorophylls. The genes homologous to At5g18660 are conserved in a broad range of species in the plant kingdom, and have similarity to reductases. Our results suggest that the PCB2 product is divinyl protochlorophyllide 8-vinyl reductase.

BackgroundReminiscent of their free-living cyanobacterial ancestor, chloroplasts proliferate by division coupled with the partition of nucleoids (DNA-protein complexes). Division of the chloroplast envelope membrane is performed by constriction of the ring structures at the division site. During division, nucleoids also change their shape and are distributed essentially equally to the daughter chloroplasts. Although several components of the envelope division machinery have been identified and characterized, little is known about the molecular components/mechanisms underlying the change of the nucleoid structure.ResultsIn order to identify new factors that are involved in the chloroplast division, we isolated Arabidopsis thaliana chloroplast division mutants from a pool of random cDNA-overexpressed lines. We found that the overexpression of a previously uncharacterized gene (AtYLMG1-1) of cyanobacterial origin results in the formation of an irregular network of chloroplast nucleoids, along with a defect in chloroplast division. In contrast, knockdown of AtYLMG1-1 resulted in a concentration of the nucleoids into a few large structures, but did not affect chloroplast division. Immunofluorescence microscopy showed that AtYLMG1-1 localizes in small puncta on thylakoid membranes, to which a subset of nucleoids colocalize. In addition, in the cyanobacterium Synechococcus elongates, overexpression and deletion of ylmG also displayed defects in nucleoid structure and cell division.ConclusionsThese results suggest that the proper distribution of nucleoids requires the YlmG protein, and the mechanism is conserved between cyanobacteria and chloroplasts. Given that ylmG exists in a cell division gene cluster downstream of ftsZ in gram-positive bacteria and that ylmG overexpression impaired the chloroplast division, the nucleoid partitioning by YlmG might be related to chloroplast and cyanobacterial division processes.

A restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) marker, HC352b, has identified as closely linked to the CRa locus responsible for clubroot resistance (CR) in a study dissecting CR loci in Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L. ssp pekinensis). Unfortunately, the RFLP pattern, including HC352b detected by the cDNA clone HC352, was complicated and confused in its interpretation because it represented multiple-copy loci. To provide a practical HC352b marker for CR breeding programs, a sequence characterized amplified region (SCAR) marker was constructed along the analysis of HC352 genes, followed by its evaluation for CR selection. Schematic characterization of signals was achieved by identification of HC352 homologous genes with their restriction sites, employing CRa-positive and -negative doubled haploid (DH) lines. Genomic sequence information from a set of HC352 homologous genes was analyzed to identify the CRa linked paralog HC352b, followed by the successful designation of a SCAR marker. This correctly predicted the CR phenotypes of all tested individuals of F 2 and back-crossed progenies.