No abstract

Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) are at the heart of eukaryotic cell-cycle control. The yeast Cdc2/CDC28 PSTAIRE kinase and its orthologs such as the mammalian Cdk1 have been found to be indispensable for cell-cycle progression in all eukaryotes investigated so far. CDKA;1 is the only PSTAIRE kinase in the flowering plant Arabidopsis and can rescue Cdc2/CDC28 mutants. Here, we show that cdka;1 null mutants are viable but display specific cell-cycle and developmental defects, e.g., in S phase entry and stem cell maintenance. We unravel that the crucial function of CDKA;1 is the control of the plant Retinoblastoma homolog RBR1 and that codepletion of RBR1 and CDKA;1 rescued most defects of cdka;1 mutants. Our work further revealed a basic cell-cycle control system relying on two plant-specific B1-type CDKs, and the triple cdk mutants displayed an early germline arrest. Taken together, our data indicate divergent functional differentiation of Cdc2-type kinases during eukaryote evolution.

Meiosis is key to sexual reproduction and genetic diversity. Here, we show that the Arabidopsis cyclin‐dependent kinase Cdk1/Cdk2 homolog CDKA;1 is an important regulator of meiosis needed for several aspects of meiosis such as chromosome synapsis. We identify the chromosome axis protein ASYNAPTIC 1 (ASY1), the Arabidopsis homolog of Hop1 (homolog pairing 1), essential for synaptonemal complex formation, as a target of CDKA;1. The phosphorylation of ASY1 is required for its recruitment to the chromosome axis via ASYNAPTIC 3 (ASY3), the Arabidopsis reductional division 1 (Red1) homolog, counteracting the disassembly activity of the AAA+ ATPase PACHYTENE CHECKPOINT 2 (PCH2). Furthermore, we have identified the closure motif in ASY1, typical for HORMA domain proteins, and provide evidence that the phosphorylation of ASY1 regulates the putative self‐polymerization of ASY1 along the chromosome axis. Hence, the phosphorylation of ASY1 by CDKA;1 appears to be a two‐pronged mechanism to initiate chromosome axis formation in meiosis.

Many plant species display remarkable developmental plasticity and regenerate new organs after injury. Local signals produced by wounding are thought to trigger organ regeneration but molecular mechanisms underlying this control remain largely unknown. We previously identified an AP2/ERF transcription factor WOUND INDUCED DEDIFFERENTIATION1 (WIND1) as a central regulator of wound-induced cellular reprogramming in plants. In this study, we demonstrate that WIND1 promotes callus formation and shoot regeneration by upregulating the expression of the ENHANCER OF SHOOT REGENERATION1 (ESR1) gene, which encodes another AP2/ERF transcription factor in Arabidopsis thaliana. The esr1 mutants are defective in callus formation and shoot regeneration; conversely, its overexpression promotes both of these processes, indicating that ESR1 functions as a critical driver of cellular reprogramming. Our data show that WIND1 directly binds the vascular system-specific and wound-responsive cis-element-like motifs within the ESR1 promoter and activates its expression. The expression of ESR1 is strongly reduced in WIND1-SRDX dominant repressors, and ectopic overexpression of ESR1 bypasses defects in callus formation and shoot regeneration in WIND1-SRDX plants, supporting the notion that ESR1 acts downstream of WIND1. Together, our findings uncover a key molecular pathway that links wound signaling to shoot regeneration in plants.

Upon DNA damage, cyclin‐dependent kinases (CDKs) are typically inhibited to block cell division. In many organisms, however, it has been found that CDK activity is required for DNA repair, especially for homology‐dependent repair (HR), resulting in the conundrum how mitotic arrest and repair can be reconciled. Here, we show that Arabidopsis thaliana solves this dilemma by a division of labor strategy. We identify the plant‐specific B1‐type CDKs (CDKB1s) and the class of B1‐type cyclins (CYCB1s) as major regulators of HR in plants. We find that RADIATION SENSITIVE 51 (RAD51), a core mediator of HR, is a substrate of CDKB1‐CYCB1 complexes. Conversely, mutants in CDKB1 and CYCB1 fail to recruit RAD51 to damaged DNA. CYCB1;1 is specifically activated after DNA damage and we show that this activation is directly controlled by SUPPRESSOR OF GAMMA RESPONSE 1 (SOG1), a transcription factor that acts similarly to p53 in animals. Thus, while the major mitotic cell‐cycle activity is blocked after DNA damage, CDKB1‐CYCB1 complexes are specifically activated to mediate HR.

(2015) 'PRC2 represses dedi erentiation of mature somatic cells in Arabidopsis.', Nature plants., 1 (7). p. 15089.Further information on publisher's website:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nplants.2015.89Publisher's copyright statement:Additional information: Use policyThe full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-pro t purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. subscreened for those that initiate ectopic proliferation of mature cells. We reasoned that root hairs represent a suitable system for this study since they have a unicellular structure on the root 3 epidermis with highly specialised functions in water and nutrient uptake 4 . As shown in Fig. 1a (Fig. 1), pointing to the requirement of PRC2 activity in suppressing ectopic proliferation of differentiated cells. Remarkably, sustained divisions ultimately lead to the formation of calli, some of which further develop into somatic embryos that show typical accumulation of lipids (Fig. 1a).Several lines of evidence demonstrate that PRC2 deficiency leads to mitotic reactivation in terminally differentiated root hairs. First, the root hair-specific differentiation marker pEXP7:NLS-GFP 8 shows a similar expression pattern in WT, heterozygous and homozygous emf2-3 vrn2-1 roots, indicating that in the absence of PRC2 root hair differentiation occurs indistinguishably from WT (Fig. 1b). In addition, root hairs of 7-day-old emf2-3 vrn2-1 plants are initially unicellular and only become multicellular in older plants (Fig. 1c). Serial observations of emf2-3 vrn2-1 roots expressing plasma membrane (LTI6-GFP) and nucleus (H2B-YFP) markers 9further indicate that only fully elongated root hairs undergo nuclear and cellular division (Fig. 1d).Multicellularisation of root hairs does not appear to follow a typical gradient along the root axis, suggesting that it is not correlated with the timing of their initial differentiation ( Supplementary Fig. 1). Time-lapse imaging of emf2-3 vrn2-1 root hairs expressing LTI6-GFP and H2B-YFP confirms that these nuclear divisions are accompanied by the formation of a new cell plate and are therefore clearly distinct from the nuclear fragmentation occasionally observed in WT root hairs 10 (Fig. 1e, Supplementary Video 1).As part of the differentiation program, Arabidopsis root hairs undergo several rounds of 4 endoreduplication, a modified cell cycle in which cells replicate nuclear DNA without mitoses and concomitantly increase nucleus and cell size 11 . Entry into the endoreduplication cycle is generally accepted as a commitment for terminal differentiation since cells that have endoreduplicated do not nor...

Cell cycle control is modified at meiosis compared to mitosis, because two divisions follow a single DNA replication event. Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) promote progression through both meiosis and mitosis, and a central regulator of their activity is the APC/C (Anaphase Promoting Complex/Cyclosome) that is especially required for exit from mitosis. We have shown previously that OSD1 is involved in entry into both meiosis I and meiosis II in Arabidopsis thaliana; however, the molecular mechanism by which OSD1 controls these transitions has remained unclear. Here we show that OSD1 promotes meiotic progression through APC/C inhibition. Next, we explored the functional relationships between OSD1 and the genes known to control meiotic cell cycle transitions in Arabidopsis. Like osd1, cyca1;2/tam mutation leads to a premature exit from meiosis after the first division, while tdm mutants perform an aberrant third meiotic division after normal meiosis I and II. Remarkably, while tdm is epistatic to tam, osd1 is epistatic to tdm. We further show that the expression of a non-destructible CYCA1;2/TAM provokes, like tdm, the entry into a third meiotic division. Finally, we show that CYCA1;2/TAM forms an active complex with CDKA;1 that can phosphorylate OSD1 in vitro. We thus propose that a functional network composed of OSD1, CYCA1;2/TAM, and TDM controls three key steps of meiotic progression, in which OSD1 is a meiotic APC/C inhibitor.

The best-characterized members of the plant-specific SIAMESE-RELATED (SMR) family of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors regulate the transition from the mitotic cell cycle to endoreplication, also known as endoreduplication, an altered version of the cell cycle in which DNA is replicated without cell division. Some other family members are implicated in cell cycle responses to biotic and abiotic stresses. However, the functions of most SMRs remain unknown, and the specific cyclindependent kinase complexes inhibited by SMRs are unclear. Here, we demonstrate that a diverse group of SMRs, including an SMR from the bryophyte Physcomitrella patens, can complement an Arabidopsis thaliana siamese (sim) mutant and that both Arabidopsis SIM and P. patens SMR can inhibit CDK activity in vitro. Furthermore, we show that Arabidopsis SIM can bind to and inhibit both CDKA;1 and CDKB1;1. Finally, we show that SMR2 acts to restrict cell proliferation during leaf growth in Arabidopsis and that SIM, SMR1/LGO, and SMR2 play overlapping roles in controlling the transition from cell division to endoreplication during leaf development. These results indicate that differences in SMR function in plant growth and development are primarily due to differences in transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation, rather than to differences in fundamental biochemical function.