We studied the usefulness of glycated albumin (GA) for decisions regarding the discontinuation of a diabetes drug in type 2 diabetic patients with good glycemic control, and the factors associated with increases in GA following discontinuation of a diabetes drug in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Sixteen patients (12 males and 4 females) were enrolled in the present study and discontinued one diabetes drug. When the change in GA was less than 1 % at 4 weeks after the discontinuation of the diabetes drug (DGA4w), discontinuation was continued (the continuous group, n = 10), but when the change in GA was more than a 1 %, the discontinued diabetes drug was resumed (the resume group, n = 6). In the continuous group, HbA1c at 12 weeks after discontinuation (6.2 ± 0.6 %) remained unchanged from its value at discontinuation (6.2 ± 0.7 %) , but it was significantly elevated at 12 weeks after discontinuation in the resume group (changing from 6.3 ± 0.1 to 7.0 ± 0.6 %). Age, duration of diabetes, and GA were significantly lower while body mass index (BMI) was significantly higher in the continuous group than in the resume group, but no significant difference in HbA1c was observed between the groups. The discontinuation of a diabetes drug in patients with low insulin secretion must be performed carefully because factors such as duration of diabetes, BMI, and GA showed significant differences between the continuous group and resume group in our study, and these indicators are known to be linked with insulin secretion.
The ratio of glycated albumin (GA) to HbA1c (the GA/HbA1c ratio) has been used as a glycemic control indicator that reflects postprandial plasma glucose levels or glycemic variability. In this study, we investigated the effects of alogliptin, a DPP-4 inhibitor, on the GA/HbA1c ratio in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Thirty-eight patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus whose glycemic control was stable were enrolled, and alogliptin (12.5 or 25 mg/day) was then administered to them for 24 weeks. HbA1c and GA levels both significantly decreased after 24 weeks (P \ 0.0001), whereas the GA/HbA1c ratio did not (P = 0.129). No correlation was observed between the change in the GA/HbA1c ratio (the DGA/HbA1c ratio) and HbA1c or GA level before the administration of alogliptin; however, a negative correlation was found between the DGA/HbA1c ratio and the GA/HbA1c ratio before the administration of alogliptin (R = -0.322, P = 0.049). Although the GA/HbA1c ratio in the low-value group (\2.80) was not significantly affected by the administration of alogliptin, that in the high-value group (C2.80) significantly decreased (P = 0.008). The administration of alogliptin significantly decreased the GA/HbA1c ratio in the high-value group after 24 weeks. Alogliptin may be more useful for patients with high postprandial plasma glucose levels than in those with low postplandial plasma glucose levels.
Some powder formulations of anticancer drugs are currently distributed under negative pressure in vials. However, the internal pressures of the vials are not described in the package inserts. Therefore, an awareness survey was conducted involving pharmacists regarding their descriptions.Anonymous questionnaires, consisting of a 5-grade scale and free description questions, were distributed to the member hospitals of Hyogo Pharmaceutical Society, and responses were collected by FAX and 2-top ratio analysis was performed. In addition, an intergroup comparison was conducted by dividing the responders into two groups based on their experiences (i.e., more or less than 3 years) of dispensing anticancer drugs.Responses were collected from 246 pharmacists of 67 hospitals: Need prior information (82.5 ) and Need description (79.3 ). Among the pharmacists with experience of less than 3 years, Feel anxiety, Need prior information, and Feel safe with description were more common (P < 0.05). Of them, 79.3 specified description sites: vial body (90.8 ), cap (65.1 ), and package insert (39.5 ). Internal pressures were listed on a sheet or described in the procedure manual in only 13 hospitals, demonstrating dependence on dispensers experiences. Besides the internal pressure, they needed information on the recommended gauge, amount of dissolution, and kind of solvent on the vial bodies.
Deterioration of drugs due to light exposure is one of the major concerns, especially regarding protection of high-calorie infusion solutions, lightproof covers are used in hospitals. In the absence of any set standards regarding their usage, they are often reused. This study aimed to investigate bacterial contamination of lightproof covers used in hospital wards. For this, lightproof covers which had been used or stored in wards were collected and bacterial cultures were carried out from them. Examination of the cultures revealed that bacteria were present in the used lightproof covers. The bacterial species detected in the used lightproof covers were Bacillus species Coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CNS) and Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Bacillus species and CNS were also detected in lightproof covers stored in wards, whereas MRSA was not detected. Intestinal bacteria were detected in only one lightproof cover. However, no bacteria were detected from either inside or outside of the unused lightproof covers that were stored in the drugs department. After allowing the unused lightproof covers stored in the drugs department to stand for 24 h, Bacillus species and CNS were detected in only one of the covers, whereas no bacteria was detected in other covers. These results indicate that there is a risk of bacterial contamination in the reuse of lightproof covers and that they should either be disposed off properly after usage or hand, finger disinfectants should be used while handling them to prevent any possible contamination.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.