ObjectiveThis study assesses the effectiveness of different interventions of knowledge transfer and behaviour modification to improve type 2 diabetes mellitus patients’ (T2DM) reported outcomes measures (PROMs) in the long-term. Design: open, community-based pragmatic, multicentre, controlled trial with random allocation by clusters to usual care (UC) or to one of the three interventions.ParticipantsA total of 2334 patients with uncomplicated T2DM and 211 healthcare professionals were included of 32 primary care centres.SettingPrimary Care Centers in Canary Islands (Spain).InterventionThe intervention for patients (PTI) included an educational group programme, logs and a web-based platform for monitoring and automated short message service (SMS). The intervention for professionals (PFI) included an educational programme, a decision support tool embedded into the electronic clinical record and periodic feedback about patients’ results. A third group received both PTI and PFI (combined intervention, CBI).Outcome measureCognitive-attitudinal, behavioural, affective and health-related quality of life (HQoL) variables.ResultsCompared with UC at 24 months, the PTI group significantly improved knowledge (p=0.005), self-empowerment (p=0.002), adherence to dietary recommendations (p<0.001) and distress (p=0.01). The PFI group improved at 24 months in distress (p=0.03) and at 12 months there were improvements in depression (p=0.003), anxiety (p=0.05), HQoL (p=0.005) and self-empowerment (p<0.001). The CBI group improved at 24 months in self-empowerment (p=0.008) and adherence to dietary recommendations (p=0.004) and at 12 months in knowledge (p=0.008), depression (p=0.006), anxiety (p=0.003), distress (p=0.01), HQoL (p<0.001) and neuropathic symptoms (p=0.02). Statistically significant improvements were also observed at 24 months in the proportion of patients who quit smoking for PTI and CBI (41.5% in PTI and 42.3% in CBI vs 21.2% in the UC group).ConclusionsAssessed interventions to improve PROMs in T2DM attain effectiveness for knowledge, self-empowerment, distress, diet adherence and tobacco cessation. PTI produced the most lasting benefits.Trial registration numberClinicalTrials.gov NCT01657227 (6 August 2012) https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01657227.

Background Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a chronic disease in which health outcomes are related to decision making by patients and health care professionals. Objective This study aims to assess the effectiveness of internet-based multicomponent interventions to support decision making of all actors involved in the care of patients with T2DM in primary care. Methods The INDICA study is an open, community-based, multicenter trial with random allocation to usual care or the intervention for patients, the intervention for health care professionals in primary care, or the combined intervention for both. In the intervention for patients, participants received an educational group program and were monitored and supported by logs, a web-based platform, and automated SMS. Those in the intervention for professionals also received an educational program, a decision support tool embedded in the electronic clinical record, and periodic feedback about patients’ results. A total of 2334 people with T2DM, regardless of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels and without diabetes-related complications, were included. The primary end point was change in HbA1c level. The main analysis was performed using multilevel mixed models. Results For the overall sample, the intervention for patients attained a significant mean reduction in HbA1c levels of ‒0.27 (95% CI ‒0.45 to ‒0.10) at month 3 and ‒0.26 (95% CI ‒0.44 to ‒0.08) at month 6 compared with usual care, which remained marginally significant at month 12. A clinically relevant reduction in HbA1c level was observed in 35.6% (191/537) of patients in the intervention for patients and 26.0% (152/586) of those in usual care at month 12 (P=.006). In the combined intervention, HbA1c reduction was significant until month 18 (181/557, 32.6% vs 140/586, 23.9%; P=.009). Considering the subgroup of patients uncontrolled at baseline, all interventions produced significant reductions in HbA1c levels across the entire study period: ‒0.49 (95% CI ‒0.70 to ‒0.27) for the intervention for patients, ‒0.35 (95% CI ‒0.59 to ‒0.14) for the intervention for professionals, and ‒0.35 (95% CI ‒0.57 to ‒0.13) for the combined intervention. Differences in HbA1c for the area under the curve considering the entire period were significant for the intervention for patients and the combined intervention compared with usual care (P=.03 for both). Compared with usual care, the intervention for professionals and the combined intervention had significant longer-term reductions in systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Conclusions In uncontrolled patients, the intervention for patients at baseline provided clinically relevant and significant longer-term reductions of HbA1c levels. The intervention for professionals and combined intervention also improved the cardiovascular risk profile of patients. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01657227; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01657227

Introduction. In cross-sectional analyses, higher levels of patient empowerment have been related to lower symptoms of anxiety and depression. The aims of this study are: (1) to assess if patient empowerment predicts anxiety and depression symptoms after 12 and 24 months among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and (2) to analyze whether a change in patient empowerment is associated with a change in anxiety and depression level. Methods. This is a secondary analysis of the INDICA study, a 24 month-long, multi-arm randomized controlled trial. Patient empowerment (DES-SF), depression (BDI-II), and state-anxiety (STAI-S) were assessed at the baseline (pre-intervention) and after 12 and 24 months. Multilevel mixed linear models with a random intercept were performed to correct for our clustered data. Results. The multilevel regression models showed that the baseline empowerment did not significantly predict anxiety and depression after 12 and 24 months. However, a higher increase in patient empowerment was significantly associated with reductions of anxiety (p < 0.001) and depression levels (p < 0.001). This association was not significantly different between the two follow-ups. Conclusion. This study contributes to the knowledge on how to reduce affective symptoms in patients with uncomplicated T2DM through comprehensive patient-centered interventions, and it highlights patient empowerment as a significant contributor.

The Monitoring Studies (MS) program, the approach developed by RedETS to generate postlaunch real-world evidence (RWE), is intended to complement and enhance the conventional health technology assessment process to support health policy decision making in Spain, besides informing other interested stakeholders, including clinicians and patients. The MS program is focused on specific uncertainties about the real effect, safety, costs, and routine use of new and insufficiently assessed relevant medical devices carefully selected to ensure the value of the additional research needed, by means of structured, controlled, participative, and transparent procedures. However, despite a clear political commitment and economic support from national and regional health authorities, several difficulties were identified along the development and implementation of the first wave of MS, delaying its execution and final reporting. Resolution of these difficulties at the regional and national levels and a greater collaborative impulse in the European Union, given the availability of an appropriate methodological framework already provided by EUnetHTA, might provide a faster and more efficient comparative RWE of improved quality and reliability at the national and international levels.

Objective The aim of the present study is to identify factors associated with patient empowerment in people living with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in the Canary Islands (Spain). Methods Secondary cross‐sectional analysis was carried out of data obtained in the INDICA study: A 24‐month cluster randomized‐controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of educational interventions supported by new technology decision tools for T2DM patients. Sociodemographic variables, clinical data (years since diagnosis, glycated haemoglobin level, creatine, triglycerides, waist hip index, body mass index and number of comorbidities), diabetes knowledge (DIATEK), affective outcomes (Beck Depression Inventory‐II, the State subscale of the State‐Trait Anxiety Inventory and The Diabetes Distress Scale) and diabetes‐related quality of life (The Audit of Diabetes‐Dependent Quality of life) were assessed as potential correlates of patient empowerment, assessed using the Diabetes Empowerment Scale‐Short Form. Multilevel mixed linear regression models on patient empowerment were developed. Results The analysis included the baseline data of 2334 patients. Results showed that age (B = −0.14; p < .001), diabetes knowledge (B = 0.61; p < .001) and state‐anxiety (B = −0.09; p < .001) are significantly associated with patient empowerment. Sex, education level, living alone, employment status, country of birth, time since diagnosis, number of comorbidities, glycated haemoglobin level, depression and distress were not independently associated with patient empowerment in the multivariate analyses. Conclusion Younger age, lower state‐anxiety and greater diabetes‐specific knowledge are important correlates of patient empowerment. In line with the results of the INDICA study, interventions based on patient‐centred care might be effective in improving patient empowerment in adults with T2DM. Understanding the factors associated with empowerment may help clinicians and policymakers to identify high‐risk groups, prioritize resources and target evidence‐based interventions to better support people with T2DM to be actively involved in their own care. Patient or Public Contribution Patients with T2DM were actively involved in the design of the INDICA study. Two patient associations were included as part of the research team and actively participated in designing the interventions and selecting outcome measures.

ObjectiveTo analyse the cost-effectiveness of multicomponent interventions designed to improve outcomes in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in primary care in the Canary Islands, Spain, within the INDICA randomised clinical trial, from the public health system perspective.DesignAn economic evaluation was conducted for the within-trial period (2 years) comparing the four arms of the INDICA study.SettingPrimary care in the Canary Islands, Spain.Participants2334 patients with T2DM without complications were included.InterventionsInterventions for patients (PTI), for primary care professionals (PFI), for both (combined intervention arm for patients and professionals, CBI) and usual care (UC) as a control group.OutcomesThe main outcome was the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-years (QALY). Only the intervention and the healthcare costs were included.AnalysisMultilevel models were used to estimate results, and to measure the size and significance of incremental changes. Missed values were treated by means of multiple imputations procedure.ResultsThere were no differences between arms in terms of costs (p=0.093), while some differences were observed in terms of QALYs after 2 years of follow-up (p=0.028). PFI and CBI arms were dominated by the other two arms, PTI and UC. The differences between the PTI and the UC arms were very small in terms of QALYs, but significant in terms of healthcare costs (p=0.045). The total cost of the PTI arm (€2571, 95% CI €2317 to €2826) was lower than the cost in the UC arm (€2750, 95% CI €2506 to €2995), but this difference did not reach statistical significance. Base case estimates of the incremental cost per QALY indicate that the PTI strategy was the cost-effective option.ConclusionsThe INDICA intervention designed for patients with T2DM and families is likely to be cost-effective from the public healthcare perspective. A cost-effectiveness model should explore this in the long term.Trial registration numberNCT01657227.

Background. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) is one of the most prevalent health problems worldwide. Besides metabolic and cardiovascular complications, nearly one in four patients with T2DM suffer from comorbid depression and it has been reported higher incidence and prevalence of anxiety disorders. Beyond metabolic and cardiovascular risk improvement, empowering patients could contribute to mental health and quality of life enhancement. This Systematic Review (SR) aims to analyze and synthetize the evidence about the effect of patient empowerment on anxiety, depression and health-related quality of life (HRQOL).Methods. A SR of the literature will be conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The review will include studies reporting the effect of patient empowerment on anxiety, depression or HRQOL in patients with a T2DM diagnosis. We will use the following databases: Medline, Embase, PsycInfo and Cochrane Library. Additionally, the database searches will be supplemented by searching through citations and references. Literature searches, identification of eligible studies, data extraction, and bias assessment will be undertaken independently by at least two researchers. All disagreements will be resolved by an independent third reviewer. If heterogeneity between studies is too high or it is not possible to conduct a meta-analysis, a narrative analysis of the study results will be provided.Discussion. Existing evidence suggest that empowerment-based strategies significantly improve knowledge, anxiety and depressive levels, self-care, and motivation; contributing to increase HRQOL in patients with T2DM. The results of this SR will provide a deeper understanding on the relationship between patient empowerment and psychosocial outcomes in T2DM.Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42020192429.

IntroductionFreeStyle Libre System (FSL) is a minimally invasive technology, which provides frequent information about interstitial glucose levels, which allows adjustment of insulin dose and a reduction in the number of fingersticks. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of FSL in childhood and adolescence.MethodsProspective case series in 27 Spanish hospitals. Patients aged 4-17 years with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) were included. Follow-up was done at 3, 6 and 12 months after starting to use the FSL. Outcome measures were HbA1c levels, acute complications of DM (severe hypoglycemia, ketoacidosis), DM knowledge, health-related quality of life, satisfaction and adverse effects. Biochemical glycemic outcomes (e.g., glycemic variability, time in therapeutic range) were available from 3 to 12 months. Mixed regression models with repeated time measurements were implemented.ResultsThe mean age of patients was 12.6 years, with 56.4 percent had HbA1c values above 7.5 percent at baseline. This subgroup significantly improved their HbA1c levels at 3, 6 and 12 months (-0.46%, -0.44% and -0.35%, respectively). Patients with controlled HbA1c levels significantly worsened at 12 months (0.29%). There was a significant reduction in severe hypoglycemic episodes, but only in the multiple imputation analysis. In patients controlled at baseline, there were significant reductions between 3 and 12 months in the percentage of time under 55mg/dl (-0.64%), above 250mg/dl (-1.8%) and glycemic variability (-2.6%). In uncontrolled patients, there was a significant reduction in time above 250mg/dl (-5.8%) between 3 and 12 months follow-up. There was no significant improvement in knowledge about disease, although general self-perceived health worsened and general satisfaction improved. Mild adverse events such as skin reactions (14%) and discomfort or pain (11.3%) with no significant reductions in follow-up were recorded.ConclusionsThe use of FSL in childhood and adolescence with T1DM produces a significant reduction in HbA1c levels in patients with uncontrolled HbA1c levels along with a reduction in severe hypoglycemic episodes (in the multiple imputation analysis). FSL-related adverse effects are considered mild.