In contrast to varied therapy approaches, mirror therapy (MT) can be used even in completely plegic stroke survivors, as it uses visual stimuli for producing a desired response in the affected limb. MT has been studied to have effects not just on motor impairments but also on sensations, visuospatial neglect, and pain after stroke. This paper attempts to systematically review and present the current perspectives on mirror therapy and its application in stroke rehabilitation, and dosage, feasibility and acceptability in stroke rehabilitation. An electronic database search across Google, PubMed, Web of Science, etc., generated 3871 results. After screening them based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, we included 28 studies in this review. The data collected were divided on the basis of application in stroke rehabilitation, modes of intervention delivery, and types of control and outcome assessment. We found that most studies intervened for upper limb motor impairments post stroke. Studies were equally distributed between intervention in chronic and acute phases post stroke with therapy durations lasting between 1 and 8 weeks. MT showed definitive motor and sensory improvements although the extent of improvements in sensory impairments and hemineglect is limited. MT proves to be an effective and feasible approach to rehabilitate post-stroke survivors in the acute, sub-acute, and chronic phases of stroke, although its long-term effects and impact on activities of daily living need to be analysed extensively.
Objective The study aims to determine the effects of implementing stroke unit (SU) care in a remote hospital in North-East India.
Materials and Methods This before-and-after implementation study was performed at the Baptist Christian Mission Hospital, Tezpur, Assam between January 2015 and December 2017. Before the implementation of stroke unit care (pre-SU), we collected information on usual stroke care and 1-month outcome of 125 consecutive stroke admissions. Staff was then trained in the delivery of SU care for 1 month, and the same information was collected in a second (post-SU) cohort of 125 patients.
Statistical Analysis Chi-square and Mann–Whitney U test were used to compare group differences. The loss to follow-up was imputed by using multiple imputations using the Markov Chain Monto Carlo method. The sensitivity analysis was also performed by using propensity score matching of the groups for baseline stroke severity (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale) using the nearest neighbor approach to control for confounding, and missing values were imputed by using multiple imputations. The adjusted odds ratio was calculated in univariate and multivariate regression analysis after adjusting for baseline variables. All the analysis was done by using SPSS, version 21.0., IBM Corp and R version 4.0.0., Armonk, New York, United States.
Results The pre-SU and post-SU groups were age and gender matched. The post-SU group showed higher rates of swallow assessment (36.8 vs. 0%, p < 0.001), mobility assessment, and re-education (100 vs. 91.5%, p = 0.037). The post-SU group also showed reduced complications (28 vs. 45%, p = 0.006) and a shorter length of hospital stay (4 ± 2.16 vs. 5 ± 2.68 days, p = 0.026). The functional outcome (modified ranking scale) at 1-month showed no difference between the groups, good outcome in post-SU (39.6%) versus pre-SU (35.7%), p = 0.552.
Conclusion The implementation of this physician-based SU care model in a remote hospital in India shows improvements in quality measures, complications, and possibly patient outcomes.
Background and Aims: The use of visual stimuli to facilitate a desired response in the affected limb in mirror therapy (MT) makes it an effective treatment modality even in instances of a complete plegic upper extremity poststroke. This article analyzes the effects of MT on impairments, activity limitation, and participation restriction in the acute and chronic phases poststroke. Methods: In total, 16 out of 3871 studies were included in the meta-analysis, using PRISMA guidelines. Data were categorized based on application in stroke rehabilitation (acute/chronic, motor/sensory/neglect/activity of daily living, upper limb/lower limb), modes and dosage of intervention delivery, types of control, and outcome assessment. RevMan 5.0 software was used for analysis. Results: Studies were equally distributed between chronic and acute phases. Therapy durations lasted between 1 and 8 weeks. Most studies intervened for upper limb motor impairments showing improvement in Brunnstrom motor recovery stages of arm ( P value: .04, 95% CI, 0.05-1.54, I2 = 59%) and hand ( P value: <.001, 95% CI, 0.80-2.01, I2 = 0%) during acute phase (0-4 weeks). “Activity/function” measured by functional independence measure showed improvement only in self-care subsection ( P value: <.001, 95% CI, 2.05-5.16, I2 = 0%). No long-term effects were analyzed in any of the included studies. Conclusion: A significant finding of this study is the role of MT in improving arm and hand impairments in acute phase poststroke. Rehabilitation protocols can be improved based on this finding. As MT is effective, affordable, and feasible, we have made suggestions toward its incorporation in physiotherapy protocols for low- and middle-income countries.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.