Background
Gliomas are the most common primary brain tumor in adults. Current treatments involve surgery, radiation, and temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy, however prognosis remains poor and new approaches are required. Circadian medicine aims to maximize treatment efficacy and/or minimize toxicity by timed delivery of medications in accordance with the daily rhythms of the patient. We published a retrospective study showing greater anti-tumor efficacy for morning, relative to evening, administration of TMZ in patients with glioblastoma. We conducted this prospective randomized trial to determine the feasibility, and potential clinical impact, of TMZ chronotherapy in patients with gliomas (NCT02781792).
Methods
Adult patients with gliomas (WHO Grade II-IV) were enrolled prior to initiation of monthly TMZ therapy and were randomized to receive TMZ either in the morning (AM) before 10 am or in the evening (PM) after 8 pm. Pill diaries were recorded to measure compliance and FACT-Br Quality of Life (QoL) surveys were completed throughout treatment. Study compliance, adverse events (AE), and overall survival were compared between the two arms.
Results
A total of 35 evaluable patients, including 21 with GBM, were analyzed (18 AM patients and 17 PM patients). Compliance data demonstrated feasibility of timed TMZ dosing. There were no significant differences in AEs, QoL, or survival between the arms.
Conclusions
Chronotherapy with TMZ is feasible. A larger study is needed to validate the effect of chronotherapy on clinical efficacy.
The B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) inhibitor venetoclax (VEN) in combination with lower-intensity therapy is an efficacious treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). VEN in combination with the hypomethylating agent azacitidine improved rates of response and measurable residual disease (MRD)-negative remissions in addition to overall survival in the pivotal phase 3 VIALE-A trial compared with azacitidine monotherapy and has since emerged as the current standard of care in older or unfit patients with AML. In younger, fit patients with AML, intensive induction and consolidation chemotherapy (IC) is commonly employed as frontline therapy; however, relapse remains the principal cause of treatment failure in approximately 30–40% of patients. Improved IC regimens that increase MRD-negative response rates, result in durable remissions, and enable transition to curative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in appropriate patients remain an area of active inquiry. Preliminary results from trials investigating the combination of VEN with IC have reported promising findings to date, with composite complete remission and MRD-negative remission rates of approximately 89–94% and 82–93%, respectively, correlating with improved 12-month event-free and overall survival compared to historical outcomes with IC. Herein, we discuss ongoing trials investigating VEN in combination with IC in addition to outcomes within specific molecularly defined subgroups; review the molecular mechanisms of sensitivity and resistance to VEN, and highlight future combinations of VEN with novel targeted therapies for the treatment of AML.
e14525 Background: High grade gliomas (HGG) (the most common being glioblastoma) are the most common primary CNS malignancy in adults. Mainstay of therapy is surgical resection followed by concurrent radiation and temozolomide (TMZ) followed by adjuvant TMZ. Unfortunately, prognosis remains poor and optimization of current therapy is critical. Chronotherapy is defined as improvement in treatment outcomes by maximizing treatment efficacy and minimizing toxicity by administering medications in accordance with biological rhythms of the patient. In a mouse model, there was greater anti-tumor efficacy during morning administration of TMZ. This trial was designed to determine the feasibility and potential clinical impact of chrono-therapeutically administering TMZ in patients with HGG. Methods: Adult patients ( > 18 years) with HGG (WHO Grade III/IV) were eligible. Patients were screened and consented prior to initiation of monthly TMZ therapy. Eligible patients were randomized to TMZ in the morning (AM) before 10AM or in the evening (PM) after 8PM. Pill diaries were recorded for drug administration time and compliance. Fact-Br Quality of Life (QoL) surveys were administered to patients at the time of enrollment in the trial and at the end of treatment to measure differences in QoL in both groups. Circadian rhythm was recorded by Actiwatch. Adverse events (AE), overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were measured for each group. Results: At the time of submission, a total of 28 patients were evaluated. 15 patients were in AM group and 13 in PM group. It is feasible for participants to take TMZ per study assignment. There was no significant difference in the QoL based on the Fact-Br dataset in the four main categories of physical well-being, social/family well-being, functional well-being and emotional well-being. The Friedman’s two-way nonparametric ANOVA tests were used to analyze the differences across time points. Cytopenias are a known adverse effect of TMZ. There was a trend towards worsening lymphocyte counts in the AM group compared to PM group, although not statistically significant. There was no statistical significance in PFS or OS in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Conclusions: Chronotherapy with TMZ is feasible. A trend of worsening lymphocyte counts is noted in AM treatment group compared to PM group but was not statistically significant. No difference in OS or PFS was noted, although sample size was too small to effectively assess this. A larger study will need to be conducted to effectively assess the effect of chronotherapy on survival. Clinical trial information: NCT02781792.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.