In 1878, amid a rapidly proliferating social interest in public health and cleanliness, a group of sanitary scientists and reformers founded the Parkes Museum of Hygiene in central London. Dirt and contagion knew no social boundaries, and the Parkes's founders conceived of the museum as a dynamic space for all classes to better themselves and their environments. They promoted sanitary science through a variety of initiatives: exhibits of scientific, medical and architectural paraphernalia; product endorsements; and lectures and certificated courses in practical sanitation, food inspection and tropical hygiene. While the Parkes's programmes reified the era's hierarchies of class and gender, it also pursued a public-health mission that cut across these divisions. Set apart from the great cultural and scientific popular museums that dominated Victorian London, it exhibited a collection with little intrinsic value, and offered an education in hygiene designed to be imported into visitors' homes and into urban spaces in the metropole and beyond. This essay explores the unique contributions of the Parkes Museum to late nineteenth-century sanitary science and to museum development, even as the growth of public-health policy rendered the museum obsolete.
With Maladies of Empire: How Colonialism, Slavery, and War Transformed Medicine, an ambitious, globe-crossing book, Jim Downs seeks to reframe the history of modern epidemiology. Following histories of race, empire, and medicine, Downs shifts the origins of disease study from urban metropoles and European publics to peripheral sites and dispossessed subjects. Nascent epidemiologists, he reveals, relied on data and observations drawn from bystanders subjected to the concurrent phenomena of colonialism, slavery, and war. Downs argues that this trifecta invariably shaped and enabled modern epidemiology. This is a broad argument, familiar by various degrees to historians of medicine, and the eight case studies that Downs presents within cut a wide swath. Readers interested in iconic facets of British history-from the slave ship Brookes to Florence Nightingale-find them recast alongside a cadre of lesser-known subjects such as Maltese washerwomen, Jamaican freedmen, African American soldiers, and enslaved youths. Downs begins with a focus on the eighteenth-century British world. Moving across the empire, Downs highlights how major shifts in the study of disease were enabled by the surveillance of unwitting patients and participants. Physician Thomas Trotter's reports of the necessity of fresh air relied on observations drawn from the transported enslaved. Naval surgeon James McWilliam's conclusions about the cause of a yellow fever epidemic in Cape Verde relied on testimonies provided by local colonized and enslaved subjects. Florence Nightingale's campaigns for military and public sanitation pulled from statistics collected by a far-flung colonial bureaucracy. Many of these studies, Downs argues, circulated and informed analogous work in North America. In chapters 6 and 7, Downs moves to the United States. Here, he is on his firmest ground in his account of Civil War medicine, detailing how the bodies and lymph of the enslaved, particularly children, were used by American doctors for smallpox inoculations. A final chapter on the cholera epidemic of 1865-66 brings the two medical worlds together. Downs sees the epidemic as a transnational crisis that prompted physicians to "think more globally" (173). As burgeoning military and medical bureaucracies created "narrative maps" (167) of cholera's global spread, institutions like the US Surgeon General's Office and the International Sanitary Commission could further shape the public health management of vast populations. This is a text rich in detail, though the novelty and nature of Downs's conclusions fall short of the scope promised by its title and introduction. Downs identifies this as a global history, yet it might more appropriately be framed as a study of the Anglo world. This comparative scaffold prompts interesting questions about the confluence and divergence of British and American epidemiology. At times, however, it produces unanswered questions. Downs is closely attuned to the contents of American and British studies, but illuminates less about how their diff...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.