Purpose This paper aims to investigate the relationship between regulatory focus, performance measurement and corporate social responsibility (CSR) investment decisions. Design/methodology/approach Using an experimental method with a 2 × 2 between-subjects factorial design involving 144 participants, the data were analyzed using t-test and contrast test. In the experiment, the authors assigned participants into prevention focus or promotion focus group and complementary performance measurement or substitute performance measurement condition. Findings The results show that CSR investment is more preferable for managers in prevention focus instead of those in promotion focus group. Additionally, CSR investment is more preferable for managers in complementary performance measurement condition compared to those in substitute performance measurement condition. This study also provides evidence that the greatest CSR investment is reached when managers are in both prevention focus group and complementary performance measurement conditions. Practical implications Companies need to activate the prevention focus for managers to motivate CSR investment. Additionally, companies need to use complementary performance measurements, which consist of CSR measurement and financial measurements. Originality/value CSR research is dominated by theories explaining the external models which trigger companies to perform CSR. Existing research related to the internal models is limited to psychological aspects that are not directly related to company performance. This study investigates the motivational attributes that have a direct and strong influence on managers behavior. This research shows that regulatory focus is better at predicting CSR investment and is more motivational for individuals to perform well at work.

Manuscript type: Research paper Research aims: This research is based on an experiment which is conducted to examine the effects of financial information and corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure on investment decision. Design/Methodology/Approach: The research employs the laboratory experiment design which involves 45 graduate students as subjects. The independent variable, financial information, is manipulated by favourable and unfavourable financial information while the CSR disclosure is manipulated by prevention focus and promotion focus. The dependent variable, investment decision, is manipulated by using the 10-point Likert scale. Subjects are randomly assigned to one of four treatments (favourable or unfavourable financial information and promotion focus or prevention focus of CSR disclosure). Research findings: The results show that CSR disclosure affects investment decision. The results also show that subjects decide on

The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of corporate governance on firm value, analyze the effect of profitability on firm value, and analyze the effect of mediating profitability on the relationship between corporate governance and firm value. The population of this study are manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2020. The sampling technique uses a purposive sampling method with the criteria for companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange and annual reports available on the company's official website. The sample of this research is a company that is included in the consumer goods industry sector, totaling 50 companies. The data source in this study is secondary data obtained from the IDX website and the company's official website. The data analysis technique in this study used the Partial Least Square (PLS) SEM method with the help of SmartPLS 3.0 software. The results of the study show that corporate governance has a significant positive effect on firm value. Meanwhile, corporate governance has no significant effect on company profitability, and profitability has no significant effect on firm value. Profitability is not able to mediate the relationship between the influence of corporate governance on firm value.

This research is to examine the effect of management control system in water supply firm to the firm performance when some control interventions exist. The case is derived from water supply firm in Banyumas Regency. In this research the effect of result control, action control, personnel control, and cultural control to the firm performance is examined and control intervention is positioned as moderating variable. Data was obtained by using questionnaire sent to employees, from top management to the lowest level. This research uses regression analysis and Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA) to test hypothesis.The result indicates that result control, personnel control and cultural control affect performance. Action control has no effect to performance. Control intervention moderates the relationship between management control system and performance, however, individually control intervention just moderate the effect of personnel control and cultural control to performance. Control intervention does not moderate the effect of result control and action control to performance.