Objetivo: Sintetizar as possibilidades de utilização da Classificação Internacional de Funcionalidade, Incapacidade e Saúde (CIF) na saúde da criança. Métodos: O processo de revisão seguiu as recomendações do PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). A revisão foi realizada nas bases de dados MEDLINE (Pubmed), LILACS e SciELO, compreendendo estudos em inglês, português ou espanhol, publicados até 2018. Resultados: Foram identificados 2375 estudos, destes, 1145 foram excluídos por duplicidade, restando 1230 para análise. Ao final, 29 artigos foram eleitos para a elaboração deste estudo. Foi possível observar grande diversidade de utilização da CIF, desde uso como desfechos de ensaios clínicos, uso do modelo biopsicossocial e uso de conceitos e categorias da CIF. Todos os componentes da CIF foram citados dentre os estudos, com maior ênfase para o componente de funções corporais e atividade e participação. Conclusões: A CIF é uma ferramenta importante e útil para a classificação da funcionalidade de crianças de forma holística em ensaios clínicos, estudos observacionais e na prática clínica. Além disso, é possível fazer acompanhamento evolutivo do desenvolvimento infantil a partir dos qualificadores da CIF.
Background SATISPART-Stroke (SATIS-Stroke) is the most complete instrument for the assessment of activity and participation following a stroke. However, its use in a developing country has only been tested through in-person interviews. Objective To determine the validity, reproducibility and viability of the SATIS-Stroke scale administered in two tele-assessment modalities: self-assessment of an electronic form versus videoconference. Methods Methodological study with Brazilian chronic stroke survivors was conducted. Stage I comprised an in-person interview to apply the SATIS-Stroke and a self-assessment by completing an electronic form to respond to the SATIS-Stroke items. Step II occurred 6 to 8 months after Step I, during which SATIS-Stroke was administered again in-person and via videoconference. The order was randomized. Results Ninety-five stroke survivors were recruited, but only 50 answered the electronic form (adherence: 52.6%). Mean scores were higher in the self-administration of electronic form compared to the in-person interview (mean difference = −0.36 ± 0.93; P = 0.009). Adequate reliability was found in the comparison of the in-person and self-assessment of electronic form (ICC2,1 = 0.66; 95%CI: 0.40–0.81). Fifty stroke survivors participated in Step II, during which adequate reliability was found in the comparison of the in-person administration and videoconference (ICC2,1 = 0.55; 95%CI: 0.21–0.74) and a moderate correlation was found between the assessment methods ( r = 0.43; P = 0.02). Discussion Adequate validity and reliability were found in the tele-assessment. Thus, this method is appropriate and viable for use in developing countries. Although reliable, the self-assessment did not have good adherence in the Brazilian population due to internet access problems, lack of familiarity with the digital form and lack of autonomy to answer the questions alone.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.