Objective Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) affects millions of newborns annually, especially in low-resource settings. Real-time monitoring of hypoxic-ischemic brain damage is urgently needed for assessment of severity and management of neonates with birth asphyxia. Aim of the work is monitoring of near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS)-measured cerebral regional oxygen saturation (cRSO2) and cerebral fractional tissue oxygen extraction (FTOE) in neonates after birth asphyxia in relation to their clinical course. Study Design Forty asphyxiated-term and near-term neonates with mild to severe HIE admitted at neonatal intensive care unit of Alexandria University Maternity Hospital from March to October 2019, received therapeutic hypothermia (TH) and had continuous NIRS monitoring of cRSO2 for 72 hours. Infants were categorized into HIE with seizing and nonseizing groups, and abnormal and normal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) groups. Results Clinical seizures (CS) occurred in 15 (37.5%) of HIE neonates and 13.3% of them died (n = 2). In the current study, significantly higher cRSO2 and lower FTOE values were found in the seizing infants as compared with nonseizing group (p < 0.001). NIRS-measured day 2-cRSO2 and day 1-FTOE were associated with CS in newborns with HIE and day 1-cRSO2 and FTOE were associated with abnormal MRI at 1 month of age. cRSO2 values were found to correlate positively with initial Thompson score especially in days 1 and 2. Further, neonates with CS were more likely to have MRI abnormalities at follow-up. Conclusion NIRS measures may highlight differences between asphyxiated neonates who develop CS or later MRI abnormalities and those who do not. Key Points
Neonates admitted to neonatal intensive care units are at a risk of developing healthcare associated infections, leading to increased risk of mortality. This study aimed to identify organisms causing such late-onset infections in neonates and determine whether these isolates were genetically identical to those from the surrounding environmental surfaces and hands of healthcare workers (HCWs). A cross-sectional study was carried out over a period of four months in a University neonatal intensive care unit. Samples were collected from all neonates with symptoms of late-onset infections (n=180). Fingerprint samples of 21 healthcare workers as well as 330 random environmental samples were also taken from the unit. Isolates from neonates, environment and fingerprints were subjected to protein electrophoresis followed by sequencing to detect genetic similarities. Almost half of neonatal samples were culture-positive (91/180, 50.6%), out of which, 72% of bacterial isolates (49/ 68) were multi-drug resistant. Klebsiella pneumoniae (32.6%) and Candida spp. (28.4%) were the commonest neonatal isolates. A cluster of four homologous Klebsiella pneumoniae strains was isolated from two neonates as well as an examining bed and a portal incubator. Another cluster was isolated from hands and three neonatal samples. Both clusters were multi-drug resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. A homologous pair of each of Candida tropicalis and Candida glabrata was isolated from the blood of two neonates, and one neonatal and a crash cart sample, respectively. Overall, 8.8% (8/91) of neonatal samples were found to be homologous to other neonatal /environmental/ hand isolates, denoting perpetuation of pathogens between neonates themselves and also other reservoirs of infections. Conclusion: Hands of healthcare providers as well as surfaces are reservoirs of multi-drug resistant pathogens in the neonatal intensive care unit.
Neonates admitted to neonatal intensive care units are at a risk of developing healthcare associated infections, leading to increased risk of mortality. This study aimed to identify organisms causing such late-onset infections in neonates and determine whether these isolates were genetically identical to those from the surrounding environmental surfaces and hands of healthcare workers (HCWs). A cross-sectional study was carried out over a period of four months in a University neonatal intensive care unit. Samples were collected from all neonates with symptoms of late-onset infections (n=180). Fingerprint samples of 21 healthcare workers as well as 330 random environmental samples were also taken from the unit. Isolates from neonates, environment and ngerprints were subjected to protein electrophoresis followed by sequencing to detect genetic similarities. Almost half of neonatal samples were culture-positive (91/180, 50.6%), out of which, 72% of bacterial isolates (49/ 68) were multi-drug resistant. Klebsiella pneumoniae (32.6%) and Candida spp. (28.4%) were the commonest neonatal isolates. A cluster of four homologous Klebsiella pneumoniae strains was isolated from two neonates as well as an examining bed and a portal incubator. Another cluster was isolated from hands and three neonatal samples. Both clusters were multi-drug resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. A homologous pair of each of Candida tropicalis and Candida glabrata was isolated from the blood of two neonates, and one neonatal and a crash cart sample, respectively. Overall, 8.8% (8/91) of neonatal samples were found to be homologous to other neonatal /environmental/ hand isolates, denoting perpetuation of pathogens between neonates themselves and also other reservoirs of infections. Conclusion: Hands of healthcare providers as well as surfaces are reservoirs of multi-drug resistant pathogens in the neonatal intensive care unit. What Is KnownThe role of hands and the environment in transmission of infections to neonates is a subject of debate Genetic sequencing provides solid evidence for detecting homologous strains Antibiotic resistance is a growing concern for all physicians What Is New Klebsiella pneumoniae was the most commonly perpetuating pathogen among neonates, environment and hands.All homologous Klebsiella strains were multi-drug resistant Proven role of environment and hands in transmitting pathogens to neonates. Inter-neonatal transmission of pathogens also occurs.
No abstract
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.