After the Fukushima nuclear plant explosion in March, 2011, countless antinuclear protests were seen on street in many countries. Yet some governments maintained their original pro-nuclear position while others announced sudden energy policy change. What accounts for this substantial variation? This research uses the synthesis of Punctuated Equilibrium Theory and Positive Political Theory to explain the crossnational variation. Three variables are identified: (i) election, (ii) past experience, and (iii) institutional setting to further our understanding on how attention of policy makers is allocated differently and thus produce variety of policy reactions in post-crisis governance across nations. Six European country cases of different post-crisis energy policy responses are chosen to cross-examine these variables' explanatory power: Germany, France, Spain, Sweden, Italy, and Switzerland. The methods and findings of this study urge researchers to go beyond treating crisis as focusing event in policy change and look into the macropolitical conditions that promote or undermine the driving energy behind policy change dynamics.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.