In superior cervical ganglion neurons, N-(piperidiny-1-yl)-5-(4-

Known agonists of the orphan receptor GPR35 are kynurenic acid, zaprinast, 5-nitro-2-(3-phenylproplyamino) benzoic acid, and lysophosphatidic acids. Their relatively low affinities for GPR35 and prominent off-target effects at other pathways, however, diminish their utility for understanding GPR35 signaling and for identifying potential therapeutic uses of GPR35. In a screen of the Prestwick Library of drugs and drug-like compounds, we have found that pamoic acid is a potent GPR35 agonist. Pamoic acid is considered by the Food and Drug Administration as an inactive compound that enables longacting formulations of numerous drugs, such as the antihelminthics oxantel pamoate and pyrantel pamoate; the psychoactive compounds hydroxyzine pamoate (Vistaril) and imipramine pamoate (Tofranil-PM); and the peptide hormones triptorelin pamoate (Trelstar) and octreotide pamoate (OncoLar). We have found that pamoic acid induces a G i/o -linked, GPR35-mediated increase in the phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2, recruitment of ␤-arrestin2 to GPR35, and internalization of GPR35. In mice, it attenuates visceral pain perception, indicating an antinociceptive effect, possibly through GPR35 receptors. We have also identified in collaboration with the Sanford-Burnham Institute Molecular Libraries Probe Production Center new classes of GPR35 antagonist compounds, including the nanomolar potency antagonist methyl-5-[(tertbutylcarbamothioylhydrazinylidene)methyl]-1-(2,4-difluorophenyl)pyrazole-4-carboxylate (CID2745687). Pamoic acid and potent antagonists such as CID2745687 present novel opportunities for expanding the chemical space of GPR35, elucidating GPR35 pharmacology, and stimulating GPR35-associated drug development. Our results indicate that the unexpected biological functions of pamoic acid may yield potential new uses for a common drug constituent.

The biarylpyrazole, N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide (SR141716; 1) has been shown to act as an inverse agonist/antagonist at the cannabinoid CB1 receptor. Our previous mutant cycle study suggested that K3.28(192) is involved in a direct interaction with the C-3 substituent of 1 in wild-type (WT) CB1.(1) However, these results did not establish what part of the C-3 substituent of 1 is involved in the K3.28(192) hydrogen bond, the carboxamide oxygen or the piperidine nitrogen. Furthermore, our previous calcium channel assay results for 5-(4- chlorophenyl)-3-[(E)-2-cyclohexylethenyl]-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4- methyl-1H-pyrazole (VCHSR; 2) (an analogue of 1 that lacks hydrogen-bonding capability in its C-3 substituent) showed that this compound acts as a neutral antagonist, a result that is in contrast to 1, which acts as an inverse agonist in this same assay.(1) These results suggested a relationship between biarylpyrazole interaction with K3.28(192) at CB1 and inverse agonism, but these results were for a single pair of compounds (1 and 2). The work presented here was designed to test two hypotheses derived from our modeling and mutant cycle results. The hypotheses are as follows: (1) it is the carboxamide oxygen of the C-3 substituent of 1 that interacts directly with K3.28(192) and (2) the interaction with K3.28(192) is crucial for the production of inverse agonism for biarylpyrazoles such as 1. To determine whether the carboxamide oxygen or the piperidine nitrogen of the C-3 substituent may be the interaction site for K3.28(192), we designed, synthesized, and evaluated a new set of analogues of 1 (3-6, Chart 1) in which modifications only to the C-3 substituent of 1 have been made. In each case, the modifications that were made preserved the geometry of this substituent in 1. The absence of the piperidine nitrogen was not found to affect affinity, whereas the absence of the carboxamide oxygen resulted in a reduction in affinity. CB1 docking studies in an inactive state model of CB1 resulted in the trend, 3,1<5,4<2<6 for ligand/CB1 interaction energies. This trend was consistent with the trend in WT CB1 Ki values versus [3H]CP55,940 reported here. In calcium channel assays, all analogues with carboxamide oxygens (1, 3, and 4) were found to be inverse agonists, whereas those that lacked this group (2, 5, and 6) were found to be neutral antagonists. Taken together, these results support the hypothesis that it is the carboxamide oxygen of the C-3 substituent of 1 that engages in a hydrogen bond with K3.28(192) in WT CB1. Furthermore, functional results for 1-6 support the hypothesis that the interaction of 1 with K3.28(192) may be key to its inverse agonism.

Dimerization or oligomerization of many G protein-coupled receptors, including the CB1 receptor, is now widely accepted and may have significant implications towards medications development targeting these receptor complexes. A library of bivalent ligands composed of two identical CB1 antagonist pharmacophores derived from SR141716 linked by spacers of various lengths were developed. The affinities of these bivalent ligands at CB1 and CB2 receptors were determined using radiolabeled binding assays. Their functional activities were measured using GTP-γ-S accumulation and intracellular calcium mobilization assays. The results suggest that the nature of the linker and its length are crucial factors for optimum interactions of these ligands at CB1 receptor binding sites. Finally, selected bivalent ligands (5d and 7b) were able to attenuate the antinociceptive effects of the cannabinoid agonist CP55,940 in a rodent tail-flick assay. These novel compounds as probes will enable further evaluation of CB1 receptor dimerization and oligomerization, its functional significance, and may prove useful in the development of new therapeutic approaches to G protein-coupled receptor mediated disorders.

There are numerous medicinal chemistry reports in the literature describing the pharmacological properties of thousands of narcotics, stimulants, hallucinogens, sedative-hypnotic drugs, cannabinoids, and other psychoactive substances as well as synthetic methods for their preparations. This information, while essential for the advancement of science, has been used by clandestine chemists to manufacture and market an endless variety of analogs of so-called designer drugs. In this review, we describe how clandestine chemists used the principles of medicinal chemistry to design molecules, referred to as designer drugs, that elicit the effects of opioids, amphetamine and analogs, cannabinoids, and phencyclidine analogs while circumventing the law.

Marijuana is the most widely abused illegal drug and its spectrum of effects suggests that several receptors are responsible for the activity. Two cannabinoid receptor subtypes, CB1 and CB2, have been identified, but the complex pharmacological properties of exogenous cannabinoids and endocannabinoids are not fully explained by their signaling. The orphan receptor GPR55 binds a subset of CB1/CB2 ligands and has been proposed as a cannabinoid receptor. This designation, however, is controversial as a result of recent studies where lysophosphatidylinositol (LPI) is identified as a GPR55 agonist. To define a biological role for GPR55 requires GPR55-selective ligands that have been unavailable. From a β-arrestin, high-throughput, high-content screen of 300,000 compounds run in collaboration with the Molecular Libraries Probe Production Centers Network initiative (PubChem AID1965), we identified potent GPR55 selective agonists. By modeling of the GPR55 activated state, we compared the GPR55 binding conformations of three of the novel agonists obtained from the screen CID1792197, CID1172084 and CID2440433 [PubChem Compound IDs] with that of LPI. Our modeling indicates the molecular shapes and electrostatic potential distributions of these agonists mimic that of LPI; the GPR55 binding site accommodates ligands that have inverted-L or T shapes with long, thin profiles that can fit vertically deep in the receptor binding pocket while their broad head regions occupy a horizontal binding pocket near the GPR55 extracellular loops. Our results will enable the optimization and design of second generation GPR55 ligands and provide a means for distinguishing GPR55 selective ligands from those interacting with cannabinoid receptors.

Antagonists of cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1) have potential for the treatment of several diseases such as obesity, liver disease and diabetes. Recently, development of several CB1 antagonists was halted due to adverse central nervous system (CNS) related side effects observed with rimonabant, the first clinically approved CB1 inverse agonist. However, recent studies indicate that regulation of peripherally expressed CB1 with CNS-sparing compounds is a viable strategy to treat several important disorders. Our efforts aimed at rationally designing peripherally restricted CB1 antagonists have resulted in compounds that have limited blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability and CNS exposure in preclinical in vitro and in vivo models. Typically, compounds with high topological polar surface areas (TPSAs) do not cross the BBB passively. Compounds with TPSAs higher than rimonabant (rimonabant TPSA = 50) and excellent functional activity with limited CNS penetration were identified. These compounds will serve as templates for further optimization.

GPR55 is a Class A G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) that has been implicated in inflammatory pain, neuropathic pain, metabolic disorder, bone development and cancer. Initially deorphanized as a cannabinoid receptor, GPR55 has been shown to be activated by non-cannabinoid ligands such as L-α-lysophosphatidylinositol (LPI). While there is increasing evidence for physiological and pathophysiological roles for GPR55, the paucity of specific antagonists has limited its study. In collaboration with the Molecular Libraries Probe Production Centers Network initiative, we identified a series of GPR55 antagonists using a β-arrestin, high-throughput, high-content screen of ~300,000 compounds. This screen yielded novel, GPR55 antagonist chemotypes with IC50s in the 0.16 to 2.72 μM range (Heynen-Genel, et al., (2010) “Screening for Selective Ligands for GPR55 – Antagonists” [ML191, ML192, ML193] Bookshelf ID: NBK66153; PMID: 22091481). Importantly, many of the GPR55 antagonists were completely selective, with no agonism or antagonism against GPR35, CB1 or CB2 up to 20 μM. Using a model of GPR55 inactive state, we studied the binding of an antagonist series that emerged from this screen. These studies suggest that GPR55 antagonists possess a head region that occupies a horizontal binding pocket extending into the extracellular loop region, a central ligand portion that fits vertically in the receptor binding pocket and terminates with a pendant aromatic or heterocyclic ring that juts out. Both the region that extends extracellularly and the pendant ring are features associated with antagonism. Taken together, our results provide a set of design rules for the development of second generation GPR55 selective antagonists.