Although no previous studies have attempted a direct comparison of performance obtained in delayed alternation and in the more usual forms of delayed response, available data indicate that with rats (1, 9) and raccoons (2) longer delays are possible when the former technique is used. Delayed response, as usually employed, gives the animal its cue by a visual presentation, either of the lure as it is being placed into one of two or more containers, or of a sign, such as a flashing light, which previously has been associated with food. In delayed alternation, on the other hand, the animal first learns that food is to be found alternately in the left and right containers, respectively; it receives the cue for each successive response from the external and internal stimuli conditioned by its own overt response to one of the containers on the just preceding trial. In both cases, therefore, the effects of a cue given at one moment must be manifested at some later time, the duration of this interval being measured in the first instance from the visual presentation until opportunity for response, in the second case from the completion of one response until the beginning of the next. It is the nature of the cue, particularly the presence in delayed alternation of kinaesthetic stimuli resulting from an overt act, which most significantly differentiates the 1 These experiments have been aided by a grant from the Research Funds of Yale University School of Medicine. The writers wish to express their appreciation to Doctor J. F. Fulton for making available the surgical facilities of the Laboratory of Physiology.
Reported in part before the Eastern Branch of the American Psychological Association, April 2, 1938: "Discrimination learning and delayed response to visual stimuli by chimpanzees," by A. H. Riesen and V. Nowlis; and before the Southern Society for Philosophy and Psychology, April 15, 1938: "Delayed response by chimpanzee to spatial versus non-spatial cues," by H. W. Nissen, A. H. Riesen, and V. Nowlis.
In a few instances we placed the vender next to the round cage and gave tokens or food to the animal in the rectangular cage. In such cases we call the former "C cage," the latter "W cage." Except for one animal (Bula) who had an initial fear of the rectangular cage, this change seemed to have no effect on behavior. W-cage was so named because in the early part of the experiment the animal worked for tokens here. C-cage refers to the cage where the animal cashed its tokens.
The matching and oddity techniques offer a convenient means for surveying the discriminative capacities of higher animals (4,6,7,9, 10,11, 12,17, 20). These techniques also lend themselves readily to studies of delayed response (1,14,15,17), "categorizing" and "symbolic" behavior (18), and "conditional response" (2, 3,16, 19).The present paper describes an experiment in which seven chimpanzees were trained to respond to that one of two very different objects which matched a third object, the sample. After mastery of this habit, the animals were tested with a variety of entirely new objects to determine the extent to which the visual matching response had been generalized. Results of the generalization tests indicate that the similarity or difference of the choice-object in respect to the sample determined the discriminative response. Three possible mechanisms through which similarity-difference may be effective are proposed. BASIC TRAINING IN MATCHINGSubjects, Apparatus, and Procedure Subjects of the experiment were four adult and three young chimpanzees whose names, sex, and ages are listed in table 1. Tom, Helene, Jojo, Scarf, and Banka were bom at the Yerkes Laboratories; Mimi was acquired in 1931, Shorty in 1942. Tom and Helene (twins) and Mimi previously had served in many laboratory experiments, including various discrimination problems. Tom had specific training in matching-from-sample in two earlier studies (1, 14), the more recent of these being done four years before the present experiment. Shorty had received a great deal of training as stage and screen performer, but had been a subject in only one laboratory study. Jojo, Scarf, and Banka are nursery-raised animals; they had been handled extensively for physical measurements but had limited experience in formal experiments. During the present study each of the subjects had its own living cage and the training was done by wheeling the apparatus up to the wire mesh wall of the cage; no direct handling of the animals, therefore, was necessary.The apparatus used is one designed for general utility in discrimination experiments. Its over-all dimensions are: width 36", depth 24", height 56". The stimulus-carrier contained three food-wells, 7-£-inches apart, each of which was covered by a stimulus-object. Baiting of the proper food-wells and placement of the objects was done behind an opaque screen. For response, the screen was raised and the carrier was rolled forwards on horizontal tracks to the wall of the cage. By reaching with its fingers through the two-inch mesh, the animal could 62
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.