Programming of ICD therapies for tachyarrhythmias of 200 beats per minute or higher or with a prolonged delay in therapy at 170 beats per minute or higher, as compared with conventional programming, was associated with reductions in inappropriate therapy and all-cause mortality during long-term follow-up. (Funded by Boston Scientific; MADIT-RIT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00947310.).

Background-The implanted cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) improves survival in high-risk cardiac patients. This analysis from the MADIT-II trial database examines the long-term clinical course and subsequent mortality risk of patients after termination of life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias by an ICD. Methods and Results-Life-table survival analysis was performed, and proportional hazards regression analysis was used to evaluate the contribution of baseline clinical factors and time-dependent defibrillator therapy to mortality during long-term follow-up. Of 720 patients with an ICD (average follow-up 21 months), 169 patients received 701 antiarrhythmic device therapies for ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Few baseline characteristics distinguished patients who received appropriate ICD therapy for their first ventricular tachyarrhythmic episode. The probability of survival for at least 1 year after first therapy for ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) was 80%. The hazard ratios for the risk of death due to any cause in those who survived appropriate therapy for termination of VT and VF were 3.4 (PϽ0.001) and 3.3 (Pϭ0.01), respectively, compared with those who survived without receiving ICD therapy, with a high frequency of heart failure and late nonsudden cardiac death after first successful ICD therapy for VF. Conclusions-Successful appropriate therapy by an ICD for VT or VF is associated with 80% survival at 1 year after arrhythmia termination. These patients are at increased risk for heart failure and nonsudden cardiac death after device termination of VT or VF and should receive special attention for the prevention and management of progressive left ventricular dysfunction during long-term follow-up.

The decrease in mortality with ICD therapy in MADIT-II is entirely due to a reduction in SCD, with similar reductions in SCD in a spectrum of subgroups stratified according to relevant baseline characteristics.

No abstract

Background-Thrombosis is a pivotal event in the pathogenesis of coronary disease. We hypothesized that the presence of blood factors that reflect enhanced thrombogenic activity would be associated with an increased risk of recurrent coronary events during long-term follow-up of patients who have recovered from myocardial infarction. Methods and Results-We prospectively enrolled 1045 patients 2 months after an index myocardial infarction. Baseline thrombogenic blood tests included 6 hemostatic variables (D-dimer, fibrinogen, factor VII, factor VIIa, von Willebrand factor, and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1), 7 lipid factors [cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, lipoprotein(a), apolipoprotein (apo)A-I, and apoB], and insulin. Patients were followed up for an average of 26 months, with the primary end point being coronary death or nonfatal myocardial infarction, whichever occurred first. The hemostatic, lipid, and insulin parameters were dichotomized into their top and the lower 3 risk quartiles and evaluated for entry into a Cox survivorship model. High levels of D-dimer (hazard ratio, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.49, 3.97) and apoB (hazard ratio, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.10, 3.00) and low levels of apoA-I (hazard ratio, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.10, 3.08) were independently associated with recurrent coronary events in the Cox model after adjustment for 6 relevant clinical covariates. Conclusions-Our findings indicate that a procoagulant state, as reflected in elevated levels of D-dimer, and disordered lipid transport, as indicated by low apoA-1 and high apoB levels, contribute independently to recurrent coronary events in postinfarction patients. (Circulation. 1999;99:2517-2522.)

No abstract

The planned MADIT-CRT trial is designed to determine if CRT-D will reduce the risk of mortality and HF events by approximately 25% in subjects with ischemic (NYHA class I-II) and non-ischemic (NYHA class II) cardiomyopathy, left ventricular dysfunction (EF ≤ 0.30), and prolonged intraventricular conduction (QRS duration ≥ 130 ms). A.N.E. 2005;10(4)Supplement:34-43MADIT; cardiac resynchronization therapy; heart failure Heart failure (HF) with its associated morbidity and mortality remains a major unresolved public health problem in the United States and throughout the world. It is estimated that HF affects nearly 5 million people in the United States alone and claims more that 300,000 lives annually. 1 The MADIT-II trial demonstrated improvement in overall survival with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) in high-risk subjects with prior myocardial infarction and advanced left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction ≤0.30) despite the occurrence of HF in this population.2 Similar results were found in the recently published SCD-HeFT and DEFINITE trials.3,4 Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with biventricular pacing is effective as adjunctive therapy to pharmacologic management of patients with severe HF and intraventricular conduction delay, with improvement in ven-

Background-The benefit of novel implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) programming in reducing inappropriate ICD therapy and mortality was demonstrated in Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Reduce Inappropriate Therapy (MADIT-RIT). However, the cause of mortality reduction remains incompletely evaluated. We aimed to identify factors associated with mortality, with focus on ICD therapy and programming in the MADIT-RIT population. Methods and Results-In MADIT-RIT, 1500 patients with a primary prophylactic indication for ICD or cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator were randomized to 1 of 3 different ICD programming arms: conventional programming (ventricular tachycardia zone ≥170 beats per minute), high-rate programming (ventricular tachycardia zone ≥200 beats per minute), and delayed programming (60-second delay before therapy ≥170 beats per minute). Multivariate Cox models were used to assess the influence of time-dependent appropriate and inappropriate ICD therapy (shock and antitachycardia pacing) and randomized programming arm on all-cause mortality. During an average follow-up of 1.4±0.6 years, 71 of 1500 (5%) patients died: cardiac in 40 patients (56.3%), noncardiac in 23 patients (32.4%), and unknown in 8 patients (11.3%). Appropriate shocks (hazard ratio, 6.32; 95% confidence interval, 3.13-12.75; P<0.001) and inappropriate therapy (hazard ratio, 2.61; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-5.31; P=0.01) were significantly associated with an increased mortality risk. There was no evidence of increased mortality risk in patients who experienced appropriate antitachycardia pacing only (hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.36-2.88; P=0.98). Randomization to conventional programming was identified as an independent predictor of death when compared with patients randomized to high-rate programming (hazard ratio, 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-3.71; P=0.03). Conclusions-In MADIT-RIT, appropriate shocks, inappropriate ICD therapy, and randomization to conventional ICD programming were independently associated with an increased mortality risk. Appropriate antitachycardia pacing was not related to an adverse outcome. Clinical Trial Registration-URL: clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT00947310.(Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014;7:785-792.)