ObjectivesTo evaluate the distinct impact of disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) combination and monotherapy in immune response to an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).MethodsThis phase 4 prospective study analysed seroconversion (SC) of anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G (IgG) and neutralising antibodies (NAb) induced by the inactivated vaccine (CoronaVac) in patients with RA in comparison to controls (CG). Disease activity and treatment were also assessed. Only participants with baseline negative IgG/NAb were included.ResultsPatients with RA (N=260) and CG (N=104) had comparable median ages (59 years (50–65 years) vs 58 years (49.8–64 years), p=0.483). Patients with RA had moderate but lower SC (61.8% vs 94.2%, p<0.001) and NAb positivity (45% vs 78.6%, p<0.001) in comparison to CG after full vaccination. Baseline disease activity did not influence immunogenicity (p>0.05). After multivariate analyses, factors independently related to reduced SC were: older age (OR=0.79 (0.70–0.89) for each 5-year interval, p<0.001), methotrexate (OR=0.54 (0.29–0.98), p=0.044), abatacept (OR=0.37 (0.19–0.73), p=0.004) and number of DMARD (OR=0.55 (0.33–0.90), p=0.018). Regarding NAb, age (OR=0.87 (0.78–0.96) for each 5-year interval, p=0.007) and prednisone >7.5 mg/day (OR=0.38 (0.19–0.74), p=0.004) were negatively related to the presence of NAb. Further comparison of SC/NAb positivity among RA treatment subgroups and CG revealed that methotrexate/tofacitinib/abatacept/tocilizumab use, in monotherapy or in combination, resulted in lower responses (p<0.05), while tumour necrosis factor inhibitor and other conventional synthetic DMARD interfered solely when combined with other therapies.ConclusionsPatients with RA under DMARD have a moderate immunogenicity to CoronaVac. We identified that nearly all DMARD combinations have a deleterious effect in immunogenicity, whereas a more restricted number of drugs (methotrexate/tofacitinib/abatacept/tocilizumab) also hampered this response as monotherapy. These findings reinforce the need of a broader approach, not limited to specific drugs, to improve vaccine response for this population.Trial registration detailsNCT04754698.

Background Discordance between patient's global assessment (PtGA) and physician's global assessment (PhGA) has been described in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Understanding the reasons for this discrepancy is important in the context of treat-to-target treatment strategy. Objective To assess the determinants of PtGA and PhGA and factors associated with discordance between them. Methods The REAL study included RA patients from Brazilian public health centers. Clinical, laboratory and outcomes measures were collected. PtGA and the PhGA were rated on a visual analog scale and analyzed. Three groups were defined: no discordance (difference between PtGA and PhGA within 3 cm), positive discordance (PtGA exceeding PhGA by >3 cm), and

No abstract

Objective This study analyzed the Very Early Disease of Systemic Sclerosis (VEDOSS) characteristics in a group of 217 patients with Raynaud phenomenon (RP) and at least one manifestation of systemic sclerosis (SSc) in search of predictors for the progression to SSc. Methods This is a cross-sectional single-center analysis of patients presenting RP with a specific SSc clinical manifestation or SSc autoantibody or SD pattern at nailfold capillaroscopy (SD-NFC), without skin involvement, who attended a scleroderma outpatient clinic between 2010 and 2019. The performance of VEDOSS and the importance of the combination of VEDOSS characteristics to predict the progression to SSc were evaluated. Results Among 217 patients, 153 (70.5%) were classified as SSc, including 65 (30%) in the first investigation; 69.3% of the SSc patients met VEDOSS criteria, compared with 6.3% of patients who did not progress to SSc. The combinations most associated with progression to SSc were RP + puffy fingers (PF) + positive antinuclear antibodies (ANA) + (SD-NFC and/or SSc specific antibody) (VEDOSS level 2), with an odds ratio (OR) of 19.52 (95%CI 4.48–85.06; p&lt; 0.001) and RP + PF + positive ANA (VEDOSS level 1; “red flags”) (OR = 15.45; p&lt; 0.001), while combinations without non-Raynaud clinical symptoms, as RP + SD-NFC (OR = 0.03; p&lt; 0.001) and RP + anticentromere + SD-NFC (OR = 0.06; p= 0.006) were associated with non-progression to SSc. Conclusion Among patients with RP with at least one manifestation of SSc, without skin involvement, combinations of VEDOSS characteristics were the strongest predictors of progression to SSc at a median follow-up of 4 years.

Objective To analyse the safety, immunogenicity and factors affecting antibody response to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome–Coronavirus–2(SARS-CoV-2) vaccination in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). Methods This is a phase 4 prospective study within a larger trial of two doses of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac) in 51 SSc patients compared with 153 controls. Anti-SARS-CoV-2-IgG and neutralizing antibodies (NAb) were assessed at each vaccine shot (D0/D28) and 6 weeks after the 2nd dose(D69), only in individuals with negative baseline IgG/NAb and those who did not have coronavirus-19(COVID19) during follow-up. Vaccine safety was also assessed in all participants. Results Patients and controls had comparable median ages [48(38.5–57) vs 48(38–57) years, p= 0.945]. Patients had mostly diffuse SSc (68.6%) and the majority (74.5%) had interstitial lung disease. Most patients were under immunosuppressive therapy (72.5%), mainly mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (52.9%). After full vaccination (D69), anti-SARS-CoV-2-IgG frequency (64.1% vs 94.2%, p&lt; 0.001) and NAb positivity (53.8% vs 76.9%; p= 0.006) were moderate, although lower than controls. The first dose response (D28) was low and comparable for both SC (p= 0.958) and NAb positivity (p= 0.537). SSc patients under MMF monotherapy vs other (no therapy/other DMARDs) had lower immunogenicity (SC : 31.3% vs 90%, p&lt; 0.001) and NAb : 18.8% vs 85%, p&lt; 0.001). Multiple regression analysis confirmed that MMF use, but not disease subtype, is associated with insufficient seroconversion [odds ratio (OR)=0.056(95%CI 0.009–0.034), p= 0.002] and NAb positivity [OR = 0.047(95%CI 0.007–0.036), p= 0.002]. No moderate/severe side-effects were observed. Conclusion CoronaVac has an excellent safety profile and moderate response to anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in SSc. Vaccine antibody response is not influenced by disease subtype and is greatly affected by MMF, reinforcing the need for additional strategies to up-modulate vaccine response in this subgroup of patients. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04754698