We postulated that the distinct pathophysiologic mechanisms of airway narrowing during the early (EAR) and the late (LAR) asthmatic responses to inhaled allergens are reflected by the generation or transmission of lung sounds in asthma. Therefore, we measured FEV1 and recorded lung sounds in eight mildly asthmatic subjects before a standardized allergen challenge (PRE), during the EAR, during the recovery phase at 2 h (MID), during the LAR at 7 h, and after inhalation of a bronchodilator (POST). The recordings were made during flow- and volume-standardized quiet breathing, and during maximal forced breathing maneuvers. Airflow-dependent power spectra were analyzed for lung sound intensity (LSI), quartile power points (Q25, Q50, Q75), and extent of wheezing (W). These sound characteristics were compared among the various stages of the challenge in the presence (EAR, LAR) and absence (PRE, MID, POST) of acute airway obstruction using ANOVA. LSI, Q25 - Q75, and W were all elevated during airway obstruction. When matched for percent fall in FEV1, during the EAR and the LAR (mean +/- SD: 26.7 +/- 4.0, and 28.9 +/- 5.7, respectively; p = 0.385), the increase in Q25, and Q50 with airflow during quiet expiration, as well as the extent of wheezing, were higher during the LAR than during the EAR (p < or = 0.042 and p < or = 0.012, respectively). At similar levels of FEV1 (p > or = 0.156), LSI on expiration was higher at POST than at PRE or MID (p < or = 0.067), whereas Q25 (p < or = 0.047) and Q50 (p < or = 0.064) were lower at POST than at PRE. During forced expiration W was higher at MID and POST than at PRE (p < or = 0.014). We conclude that LSI, frequency content, and the extent of wheezing vary during the subsequent stages of allergen-induced bronchoconstriction in asthma despite matched values of FEV1. This suggests that airflow-standardized phonopneumography is a sensitive method for detecting differences in the pathophysiology of airway narrowing in asthma.
T Th he e e ef ff fe ec ct t o of f m me et th ha ac ch ho ol li in ne e--i in nd du uc ce ed d a ac cu ut te e a ai ir rw wa ay y n na ar rr ro ow wi in ng g o on n l lu un ng g s so ou un nd ds s i in n n no or rm ma al l a an nd d a as st th hm ma at ti ic c s su ub bj je ec ct ts s ABSTRACT: The association between lung sound alterations and airways obstruction has long been recognized in clinical practice, but the precise pathophysiological mechanisms of this relationship have not been determined. Therefore, we examined the changes in lung sounds at well-defined levels of methacholine-induced airway narrowing in eight normal and nine asthmatic subjects with normal baseline lung function. All subjects underwent phonopneumography at baseline condition and at ≥20% fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV 1 ), and in asthmatic subjects also at ≥40% fall in FEV 1 . Lung sounds were recorded at three locations on the chest wall during standardized quiet breathing, and during maximal forced breathing. Airflow-dependent power spectra were computed using fast Fourier transform. For each spectrum, we determined the intensity and frequency content of lung sounds, together with the extent of wheezing. The results were analysed using analysis of variance (ANOVA).During acute airway narrowing, the intensity and frequency content of the recorded sounds, as well as the extent of wheezing, were higher than at baseline in both groups of subjects. At similar levels of obstruction, both the pitch and the change in sound intensity with airflow were higher in asthmatics than in normal subjects. Wheezing, being nondiscriminative between the subject groups at baseline, was more prominent in asthmatics than in normal subjects at 20% fall in FEV 1 .We conclude that, at given levels of acute airway narrowing, lung sounds differ between asthmatics and normal subjects. This suggests that airflow-standardized phonopneumography is a sensitive method for detecting abnormalities in airway dynamics in asthma. Our results favour the use of quiet, well-controlled breathing during auscultation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.