B-type natriuretic peptide-guided therapy reduces all-cause mortality in patients with chronic HF compared with usual clinical care, especially in patients younger than 75 years. A component of this survival benefit may be due to increased use of agents proven to decrease mortality in chronic HF. However, there does not seem to be a reduction in all-cause hospitalization or an increase in survival free of hospitalization using this approach.

AimsBone marrow stem cell (BMSC) treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has been primarily via the intracoronary route or via endogenous mobilization using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). Studies have provided conflicting results. We therefore performed a meta-analysis of these treatments, examining short-and long-term efficacy and safety. Methods and resultsRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) of BMSC-based therapy for STEMI, delivered within 9 days of reperfusion, were identified by systematic search. Random effects models were used to calculate pooled effects of clinical outcomes, with meta-regression to assess dependence of the magnitude of effect sizes on study characteristics. Twenty-nine RCTs enrolling 1830 patients were included. Intracoronary BMSC therapy resulted in an overall improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 2.70% [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.48-3.92; P , 0.001] in the short term and 3.31% (95% CI 1.87 -4.75; P , 0.001) longer term. Meta-regression suggested a dose-response relationship between quantity of CD34 + cells delivered and increase in LVEF (P ¼ 0.007). G-CSF treatment resulted in a trend towards similar benefits (P ¼ 0.20). No significant differences were observed in pooled adverse outcome rates between intervention and control groups of either treatment approach, except for lower revascularization rates with intracoronary BMSC vs. control (odds ratio 0.68, 95% CI 0.47-0.97; P ¼ 0.03). ConclusionsIntracoronary BMSC therapy post-STEMI improves LVEF beyond standard medical treatment, in both the short and longer term. G-CSF treatment shows positive but non-significant trends. Both treatments demonstrate safety comparable with conventional medical treatment.--

The interface between eHealth technologies and disease management in chronic conditions such as chronic heart failure (CHF) has advanced beyond the research domain. The substantial morbidity, mortality, health resource utilization and costs imposed by chronic disease, accompanied by increasing prevalence, complex comorbidities and changing client and health staff demographics, have pushed the boundaries of eHealth to alleviate costs whilst maintaining services. Whilst the intentions are laudable and the technology is appealing, this nonetheless requires careful scrutiny. This review aims to describe this technology and explore the current evidence and measures to enhance its implementation.

Chronic heart failure (CHF) among Aboriginal/Indigenous Australians is endemic. There are also grave concerns for outcomes once acquired. This point is compounded by a lack of prospective and objective studies to plan care. To capture the essence of the presented topic it is essential to broadly understand Indigenous health. Key words such as ‘worsening’, ‘gaps’, ‘need to do more’, ‘poorly studied’, or ‘future studies should inform’ occur frequently in contrast to CHF research for almost all other groups. This narrative styled opinion piece attempts to discuss future directions for CHF care for Indigenous Australians. We provide a synopsis of the problem, highlight the treatment gaps, and define the impediments that present hurdles in optimising CHF care for Indigenous Australians.

No abstract