No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

This paper reports on a research-based mathematics curriculum program development project in Sweden, whose educational context is currently characterized by multiple reform initiatives. Current reforms include a repositioning of the teacher as central for students' learning, but also a trend toward initiatives and teacher resources that are more directive than has been the case in the past 30 years. Collecting data from multiple sources, such as teacher log books, lesson observations and feedback meetings, we build on input from 11 elementary school teachers trying out our materials, including student texts and a teachers' guide, during four trial rounds. We analyze how international research about curriculum programs and teachers' use of these programs are interpreted and operationalized within the Swedish context. In particular, the two research questions guiding the study are: (1) "How do Swedish teachers interact with and reason about the reform-based classroom practices promoted by the curriculum program?" and (2) "How do Swedish teachers interact with and reason about their use of a teachers' guide?" From our experiences in the Swedish educational context, we suggest the following contextual aspects to take into account when designing a curriculum program whose design is grounded in international research literature: characteristics of current classroom practices, teachers' role in classrooms, the level of explicit/implicit support teachers are used to receiving, and teachers' experiences using a teachers' guide.

We examine teachers' reflections on incorporating digital instructional resources (DIRs) into their mathematics teaching. We analyze qualitative interviews with 39 elementary school teachers from four educational contexts: Belgium, Finland, Sweden, and the U.S., using a framework proposed by Pepin et al. (2017) to consider opportunities for DIRs to shift elements of teaching and learning in potentially transformative ways. Teachers described three major domains of teaching practice where they used DIRs: a) class instruction, b) student practice, and c) professional participation. We found that teachers readily used DIRs during class instruction and to support student practice, guided by their existing instructional goals, which were shaped in part by education structures in the context. Few teachers incorporated DIRs in ways that transformed typical learning spaces. We also found that DIRs impacted several aspects of teachers' professional practices, including professional learning and collaboration. In particular, participation in social media and resource sharing altered the nature of and ways teachers participated in their own professional learning. We assert that efforts to use DIRs to stimulate change need to begin with an understanding of teachers' current practices and use our findings to identify three potential levers that might support movement toward change.

No abstract