The treatment of female-to-male transsexuals with long-acting testosterone undecanoate may be a feasible and safe option for testosterone augmentation in these subjects. However, monitoring of blood pressure should not be ignored during the treatment, to identify patients liable to develop hypertension.

In transsexual people, cross-sex hormone therapy is an important component of medical treatment. In male-to-female transsexuals, feminizing effects should be achieved before irreversible sex reassignment surgery (SRS) is considered. The most common treatment regimen in male-to-female transsexuals is a combination of ethinyl oestradiol and cyproterone acetate, with the exception of transdermal oestradiol-17beta in individuals over the age of 40. The mortality and morbidity rates with this treatment regimen have been reported in more than 800 patients. Typical side effects include venous thrombosis, elevated liver enzymes, symptomatic gallstones, hyperprolactinaemia and depression. Sixty male-to-female transsexuals were treated with monthly injections of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) and oral oestradiol-17beta valerate for 2 years to achieve feminisation until SRS. There was a significant decline in gonadotropins, total testosterone and calculated free testosterone. In general, the treatment regimen was well accepted. An equal increase in breast size was achieved compared to common hormone therapy. Two side effects were documented. One, venous thrombosis, occurred in a patient with a homozygous MTHFR mutation. One patient was found to be suffering from symptomatic preexisting gallstones. No other complications were documented. Liver enzymes, lipids, and prolactin levels were unchanged. Significantly increased oestradiol and SHBG serum levels were detectable. In addition, an increase in bone mass density, in the femoral neck and lumbar spine, was recorded. We conclude that cross-sex hormone treatment of male-to-female transsexuals using GnRHa and oestradiol-17beta valerate is effective, and side effects and complication rates can be reduced using the treatment regimen presented here.

The assumption that endometriosis is a disease of the premenopausal period and in women of reproductive age needs to be called into question, as well as the influence of estrogen in fully developed endometriosis. Due to the relatively high prevalence of the condition in patients aged over 40, physicians should consider endometriosis in cases of unclear pelvic pain in this age group.

Background: The aim of the present study is to assess insulin resistance (IR) in women with hyperandrogenic syndrome, which was suggested to replace the term polycystic ovary syndrome by the Androgen Excess Society, and to evaluate whether sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) can be used as a predictive marker of IR in hyperandrogenic women. Methods: Clinical, metabolic, and endocrine parameters were measured, and an oral glucose tolerance test was carried out. The women were classified as IR group or non-IR group, in accordance with defined cutoff points for the homeostatic model assessment of IR (HOMA-IR) at R2.5, the quantitative insulin sensitivity check index at %0.33, and the Matsuda insulin sensitivity index (ISI) at %5. Results: The women classified as having IR had a significantly higher body mass index (BMI) and free androgen index (FAI) and showed significantly lower SHBG and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels, regardless of the indices used. However, with the Matsuda ISI, generally more women were diagnosed as having IR, and this group had significantly higher total testosterone and triglyceride values, as well as a higher incidence of hirsutism. Conclusions: Women who were classified as being insulin resistant using insulin sensitivity indices showed significantly higher BMI and FAI values and lower SHBG and HDL levels. However, the Matsuda ISI may be more favorable for identifying IR in hyperandrogenic women. SHBG may serve as a predictive marker of IR in these women, particularly in those who are obese.