Background: Of the major peanut allergens, sensitivity to Ara h 2 has the highest prediction for clinical allergy. In this study, we evaluated sensitization to peanut components in Iceland and related Ara h 2-negative sensitization to clinical allergy. Methods: Ara h 1, Ara h 2, Ara h 3, Ara h 8, and Bet v 1 IgEs were measured (ImmunoCAP) in 220 peanut IgE (Pn-IgE)-positive serum samples. Ara h 2 IgE-negative individuals were invited to an open peanut challenge and evaluated for Ara h 6 and 9 sensitization (ISAC microarray). Results: The Ara h 2 IgE-negative group (52.3%, 115/220) was older (p = 0.04) and more likely to have a history of pollen allergy than the Ara h 2-positive group (p < 0.001). Of the Ara h 2-negative participants, 24.3% were already consuming peanuts and 38.3% were unavailable. Of the 43 who underwent an open peanut challenge, 79% were negative, 14% were positive, and 7% were inconclusive. Those who reacted to peanuts had a higher Ara h 1 IgE than that of the tolerant participants, and 3 were positive to Ara h 6 IgE, and 2 of those subjects were monosensitized. Ara h 8 may have caused a positive reaction, while Ara h 9 did not. Conclusions: Half of the peanut-sensitized individuals in Iceland were not sensitized to the major allergen Ara h 2. Ara h 1, Ara h 3, and Ara h 6 sensitizations resulted in a positive open peanut challenge and they are therefore clinically important for individuals with a peanut allergy in Iceland.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.