Landfill gas containing methane is produced by anaerobic degradation of organic waste. Methane is a strong greenhouse gas and landfills are one of the major anthropogenic sources of atmospheric methane. Landfill methane may be oxidized by methanotrophic microorganisms in soils or waste materials utilizing oxygen that diffuses into the cover layer from the atmosphere. The methane oxidation process, which is governed by several environmental factors, can be exploited in engineered systems developed for methane emission mitigation. Mathematical models that account for methane oxidation can be used to predict methane emissions from landfills. Additional research and technology development is needed before methane mitigation technologies utilizing microbial methane oxidation processes can become commercially viable and widely deployed.

To employ technologies that sustainably harvest resources from wastewater (for example struvite granules shown here), new perceptions and infrastructure planning and design processes are required.Water and wastewater system decisions have been traditionally driven by considerations of function, safety, and cost-benefit analysis. The emphasis on costs and benefits would be acceptable if all relevant factors could be included in the analysis, but unfortunately many relevant factors are routinely excluded. Coupled with failures to fully engage the public in decision-making processes, this can impede progress toward achieving sustainable solutions. Ignoring broader social issues that impact the adoption of sustainable solutions prolongs not only global environmental and ecological problems, but also unjust public health and social conditions in the developing world.Within the water and wastewater management industry, discussions of sustainable development have often focused on water stress (1, 2): a hazard that is exacerbated by other global stressors such as climate change, demographic and land use changes, increasing population, and urbanization (2). In addition to water stress, water and wastewater management practices contribute to nutrient imbalances and a host of environmental detriments such as eutrophication (3), discharge of pharmaceuticals and other emerging contaminants (4), and a loss of biodiversity in receiving streams (5). Efforts to address these issues across regional and global scales are hindered by the historical disconnect between the water quality and water quantity factions of the water profession. Although our understanding of sustainability is constantly evolving, the water and wastewater design process retains its foundation in engineering traditions established in the early 20th century (6). As we chart a path in the 21st century, we contend that wastewater contains resources worthy of recovering and that the development of

We report the results of pyrosequencing of DNA collected from the activated sludge basin of a wastewater treatment plant in Charlotte, NC. Using the 454-FLX technology, we generated 378,601 sequences with an average read length of 250.4 bp. Running the 454 assembly algorithm over our sequences yielded very poor assembly, with only 0.3% of our sequences participating in assembly of significant contigs. Of the 117 contigs greater than 500 bp long that were assembled, the most common annotations were to transposases and hypothetical proteins. Comparing our sequences to known microbial genomes showed nonspecific recruitment, indicating that previously described taxa are only distantly related to the most abundant microbes in this treatment plant. A comparison of proteins generated by translating our sequence set to translations of other sequenced microbiomes shows a distinct metabolic profile for activated sludge with high counts for genes involved in metabolism of aromatic compounds and low counts for genes involved in photosynthesis. Taken together, these data document the substantial levels of microbial diversity within activated sludge and further establish the great utility of pyrosequencing for investigating diversity in complex ecosystems.Although largely invisible in the urban landscape when they are functioning well, wastewater treatment plants are integral to the municipal obligation to protect public health, aquatic ecosystems, and the quality of life. At the heart of wastewater treatment plants is a process whereby a dense microbial consortium is employed to remove organic and nutrient contaminants. The microbes used to treat wastewater are a crucial tool in environmental protection. The current use of molecular techniques that do not require the isolation and cultivation of microorganisms (1, 33), including 16S rRNA analysis (6,13,20) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (8), have greatly expanded our understanding of wastewater microbial communities. Researchers have identified many bacteria of importance to wastewater treatment, including the bacteria involved in biological phosphorus removal (5, 16, 29), nitrifiers (8, 19, 25), denitrifiers (3, 12, 17), and methanogens (18, 36). Molecular techniques have also improved our understanding of fundamental processes such as nitrification and denitrification, as well as plant upsets, such as foaming (9, 24), which can decrease treatment efficiency.In this paper, we apply recently developed pyrosequencing technology to probe the molecular diversity of the aerobic basin of a wastewater treatment plant in Charlotte, NC. In line with other studies of complex microbial communities (28, 32), we observed astounding levels of diversity. We found that substantial regions of the genomes of the most prevalent microbes in the wastewater treatment plant are poorly described by existing sequence databases. Our results demonstrate that despite recent technological advances that allow identification of microorganisms, the microbial population of wastewater treatment plan...

Landfill gases produced during biological degradation of buried organic wastes include methane, which when released to the atmosphere, can contribute to global climate change. Increasing use of gas collection systems has reduced the risk of escaping methane emissions entering the atmosphere, but gas capture is not 100% efficient, and further, there are still many instances when gas collection systems are not used. Biotic methane mitigation systems exploit the propensity of some naturally occurring bacteria to oxidize methane. By providing optimum conditions for microbial habitation and efficiently routing landfill gases to where they are cultivated, a number of bio-based systems, such as interim or long-term biocovers, passively or actively vented biofilters, biowindows and daily-used biotarps, have been developed that can alone, or with gas collection, mitigate landfill methane emissions. This paper reviews the science that guides bio-based designs; summarizes experiences with the diverse natural or engineered substrates used in such systems; describes some of the studies and field trials being used to evaluate them; and discusses how they can be used for better landfill operation, capping, and aftercare.

This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of vegetation, N fertilizers, and lime addition on landfill CH4 oxidation. Columns filled with compacted sandy loam and sparged with synthetic landfill gas were used to simulate a landfill cover. Grass‐topped and bare‐soil columns reduced inlet CH4 by 47 and 37%, respectively, at peak uptake; but the rate for both treatments was about 18% at steady slate. Nitrate and NH4 amendments induced a more rapid onset of CH4 oxidation relative to KCl controls. However, at steady state, NH4 inhibited CH4 oxidation in bare columns but not in grassed columns. Nitrate addition produced no inhibitory effects. Lime addition to the soil consistently enhanced CH4 oxidation. In all treatments, CH4 consumption increased to a peak value, then declined to a lower steady‐state value; and all gassed columns developed a pH gradient. Neither nutrient depletion nor protozoan grazing could explain the decline from peak oxidation levels. Ammonium applied to grassed cover soil can cause transient reductions in CH4 uptake, but there is no evidence that the inhibition persists. The ability of vegetation to mitigate NH4 inhibition indicates that results from bare‐soil tests may not always generalize to vegetated landfill caps.