Rapid light-response curves (RLC) of variable chlorophyll fluorescence were measured on estuarine benthic microalgae with the purpose of characterising its response to changes in ambient light, and of investigating the relationship to steady-state light-response curves (LC). The response of RLCs to changes in ambient light (E, defined as the irradiance level to which a sample is acclimated to prior to the start of the RLC) was characterised by constructing light-response curves for the RLC parameters alpha (RLC), the initial slope, ETR(m,RLC), the maximum relative electron transport rate, and E (k,RLC), the light-saturation parameter. Measurements were carried out on diatom-dominated suspensions of benthic microalgae and RLC and LC parameters were compared for a wide range of ambient light conditions, time of day, season and sample taxonomic composition. The photoresponse of RLC parameters was typically bi-phasic, consisting of an initial increase of all parameters under low ambient light (E < 21-181 micromol m(-2) s(-1)), and of a phase during which alpha (RLC) decreased significantly with E, and the increase of ETR(m,RLC) and E (k,RLC) was attenuated. The relationship between RLC and LC parameters was dependent on ambient irradiance, with significant correlations being found between alpha (RLC) and alpha, and between ETR(m,RLC) and ETR(m), for samples acclimated to low and to high ambient irradiances, respectively. The decline of alpha (RLC) under high light (Deltaalpha (RLC)) was strongly correlated (P < 0.001 in all cases) with the level of non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) measured before each RLC. These results indicate the possibility of using RLCs to characterise the steady-state photoacclimation status of a sample, by estimating the LC parameter E (k), and to trace short-term changes in NPQ levels without dark incubation.
The vertical migratory behaviour of estuarine microphytobenthos, i.e. the biofilm-forming microalgae inhabiting intertidal sediments, is probably a significant factor for their success in this extreme and unstable environment. The present work aimed to assess the relative role of endogenous versus environmental control of benthic microalgal vertical migratory behaviour. This was done by comparing the patterns of vertical migration in undisturbed sediment samples kept under constant conditions of darkness and low light with those in ambient light conditions, by measuring the changes in the surface microalgal biomass during daytime low-tide periods. The results showed that the formation of a biofilm was a two-phase process. It began with a relatively small accumulation of cells at the surface, starting hours before the beginning of the light period and endogenously driven. However, the full formation of the biofilm required exposure to light by the expected beginning of the photoperiod, which further promoted upward migration and accelerated the cell accumulation at the surface. In the absence of light, upward migration was interrupted and the incipient biofilm began to disaggregate. The relative importance of the endogenously controlled behaviour varied during the spring-neap tidal cycle, reaching a maximum on those days when low tide occurred in the middle of the day, suggesting its entrainment by the duration of light exposure on previous days. The regulation of the surface cell concentration during daytime low tides was found to be strongly dependent on exogenous factors, particularly irradiance. The spontaneous disaggregation of the biofilm shortly before the end of the low-tide period (due to tidal flood or sunset), both under constant as well as ambient light conditions, suggested the presence of an endogenously controlled positive geotaxis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.