BackgroundNeutralizing antibody assessments play a central role in human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1) vaccine development but it is unclear which assay, or combination of assays, will provide reliable measures of correlates of protection. To address this, an international collaboration (NeutNet) involving 18 independent participants was organized to compare different assays.MethodsEach laboratory evaluated four neutralizing reagents (TriMab, 447-52D, 4E10, sCD4) at a given range of concentrations against a panel of 11 viruses representing a wide range of genetic subtypes and phenotypes. A total of 16 different assays were compared. The assays utilized either uncloned virus produced in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) (virus infectivity assays, VI assays), or their Env-pseudotyped (gp160) derivatives produced in 293T cells (PSV assays) from molecular clones or uncloned virus. Target cells included PBMC and genetically-engineered cell lines in either a single- or multiple-cycle infection format. Infection was quantified by using a range of assay read-outs that included extracellular or intracellular p24 antigen detection, RNA quantification and luciferase and beta-galactosidase reporter gene expression.FindingsPSV assays were generally more sensitive than VI assays, but there were important differences according to the virus and inhibitor used. For example, for TriMab, the mean IC50 was always lower in PSV than in VI assays. However, with 4E10 or sCD4 some viruses were neutralized with a lower IC50 in VI assays than in the PSV assays. Inter-laboratory concordance was slightly better for PSV than for VI assays with some viruses, but for other viruses agreement between laboratories was limited and depended on both the virus and the neutralizing reagent.ConclusionsThe NeutNet project demonstrated clear differences in assay sensitivity that were dependent on both the neutralizing reagent and the virus. No single assay was capable of detecting the entire spectrum of neutralizing activities. Since it is not known which in vitro assay correlates with in vivo protection, a range of neutralization assays is recommended for vaccine evaluation.
The hypothesis is that there are neutralizing epitopes on the surface of free virions of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) that correspond to the genetic subtype of the envelope glycoprotein. Assays with extended incubation and reduced absorption phases are required to demonstrate neutralization with antibodies to these epitopes. These assays quantify virus infectivity, rather than reductions in release of antigen into culture supernatants. Neutralizing antibodies reduce virus infectivity by at least 80%, as scored by the presence/absence of antigen released after 14 days in culture of mitogen-transformed peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). The epitopes are shared within different subtypes of group M, but not group O, isolates. Individual plasma, selected from three, independent panels of seropositive individuals, cross-neutralize within each subtype as well as the combinations of A with C, B with D or G, and C with CRF01_AE. Isolates within subtype B show the greatest variation in their resistance to neutralization, ranging from highly sensitive to highly resistant. No highly sensitive subtype D isolates were identified. Isolates from subtypes A, C, and CRF01_AE were all resistant. The strategic implication for vaccine design is that antibodies to a limited number of epitopes can neutralize more than 90% of the HIV-1 isolates that are circulating currently in the world. Also, since only antibodies that produce an all-or-nothing loss in virus infectivity can reasonably be expected to prevent the viremic phase after in vivo infection, assays with extended incubation, and culture phases should be used to monitor current efficacy trials.
HIV-1 infected individuals with cross-neutralizing antibodies against primary HIV-1 isolates belonging to Group M (envA-H) and O, are identified. To investigate the neutralization-kinetics of primary isolates with these antibodies, different neutralization assay conditions are compared. Each set is summarized as a/b/c where a is the time in hours for which antibody is incubated with virus, b is the time in hours allowed for virus to absorb to cells, c is the total culture period in days, from the cells' first exposure to virus, before antigen production (peripheral blood mononuclear cells) or number of fluorescent cells (GHOST) are measured. In HIV-infected individuals, neutralizing antibodies can be detected against a wide range of primary isolates (Group M; A-H and Group O) in PBMC-assays with short incubation phases (1/2/7 or 1/24/7). If cultures are extended (1/2/14 or 1/24/14), however, neutralization can be lost. In kinetic experiments, neutralization can even be seen without pre-incubation (a=0 hr). This study shows that neutralization of primary HIV isolates by cross-reactive antibodies can continue after the virus has bound to its target cell. This neutralization, however, is not an all or nothing loss in virus infectivity. Most often it leads only to a reduction in viral replication rates.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.