Renal transplant recipients (RTR) have a 50-200-fold higher risk for nonmelanoma-skin cancer (NMSC) causing high rates of morbidity and sometimes mortality. Cohort-studies gave evidence that a sirolimusbased immunosuppression may inhibit skin tumor growth. This single-center, prospective, assessorblinded, randomized trial investigated if switching to sirolimus treatment inhibits the progression of premalignancies and moreover how many new NMSC occur compared to continuation of the original immunosuppressive therapy. Forty-four RTR (mean age 59.9 years, mean duration of immunosuppression 229.5 months) with skin lesions were randomized to sirolimus or continuation of their original immunosuppression. Blinded dermatological assessment at month 6 and 12 by the same dermatologist evaluated the clinical change compared to baseline. Biopsy was performed in suspected malignancy. Already the 6-month-assessment showed significant superiority of sirolimus-therapy: a stop of progression, even regression of preexisting premalignancies (p < 0.0005). This effect was increased at month 12 (p < 0.0001). Nine patients developed histologically confirmed NMSC: one in the sirolimus group, eight in the control group, p = 0.0176. Sirolimus-based immunosuppression in RTR, even when established many years after transplantation, can delay the development of premalignancies, induce regression of preexisting lesions and decelerate the incidence of new NMSC.
Live kidney donation is increasing rapidly. Increases of blood pressure and proteinuria but no accelerated loss of renal function in kidney donors have been described. The credibility of this research is hampered by retrieval rates of only 50-70% of donors.We studied renal function, blood pressure, proteinuria, parathyroid hormone, 1,25(OH) 2 cholecalciferol and calcium and phosphate excretion in a live kidney donor cohort with a 93% retrieval rate. A comprehensive physical and laboratory examination including 24-h urine collection was conducted. None of the 152 donors had renal failure. Mean time after uninephrectomy was 11 ± 7 (range: 1-28) years. GFR had declined by 25%. Blood pressure had increased from 125 ± 15/79 ± 11 to 134 ± 19/81 ± 9 mmHg (p < 0.01) but remained significantly below normal. Fifty six percent of donors developed proteinuria (>150 mg/day), but only 10% had albuminuria. Nineteen percent had increased PTH, 30% had a decreased tubular reabsorption rate of phosphate. Regarding risk factors for a higher loss of GFR, greater increases in blood pressure or proteinuria no consistent picture emerged. Because of the high incidence of proteinuria and possible changes in bone metabolism inclusion of kidney donors in registries appears worthwhile.
Summary
Relapse of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) after renal transplantation is 20–40%. Recurrence after a first relapse is 80%. The only current treatment is plasmapheresis and/or cyclophosphamide. We report successful treatment of a second relapse in a 48‐year‐old patient. At age 33, FSGS was diagnosed. The patient began hemodialysis 1 year later. In her first renal transplant, she developed recurrent FSGS and reached terminal transplant failure 3 years later. Eight years later, a second transplant was performed. Immunosuppressive regimen: steroids, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), tacrolimus (TAC), and rabbit anti‐thymocyte globulin. Proteinuria of 2–6 g/day was detected and a biopsy showed recurrent FSGS. Plasmapheresis was started without success. Another biopsy still showed FSGS. The patient received two doses of rituximab (375 mg/m2 each) i.v. Three weeks later, proteinuria was 350 mg/day (serum‐creatinine 1.6 mg/dl). Twelve months later, proteinuria was at 90 mg/day. Rituximab might be an option for recurrent FSGS after renal transplantation.
Study Type – Therapy (case series)
Level of Evidence 4
What’s known on the subject? and What does the study add?
Immmunosuppression is an etablished risk factor for development of different maligancies. Nevertheless, little is known about the behaviour of renal cell cancer of native and graft kidneys in renal transplanted patients. The study results show an increased incidence of renal cell carcinoma in renal transplant recipients with high prevalence of papillary subtype, significantly younger patient age at the immunosuppression onset, aggressive behaviour with an increased tendency to systemic advance despite a high rate of low‐stage and low‐grade carcinomas at diagnosis. Furthermore, graft tumours had a more favourable prognosis than those of native kidney.
OBJECTIVE
To access the epidemiological, clinical and survival features of renal transplant patients with de novo renal cell carcinoma of native and graft kidneys.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
We performed a retrospective examination of the data of 2001 consecutive renal transplant recipients at our centre between November 1979 and January 2010.
RESULTS
In the patient cohort examined, 30 renal cell carcinomas were observed in 26 individuals (incidence 1.5%) with 25 tumours in the native and five in allograft kidneys. Mean tumour size in surgical specimens was 44 ± 36 mm. The rate of papillary cancer was 37.5%.
After a mean follow‐up of 58.6 ± 62.3 months, 15.4% of the patients died from cancer and 57.7% were in complete remission.
Overall and tumour‐specific survival rates at 1, 5 and 10 years were 86.1%, 75.1% and 43.8%, and 90.4%, 83.5% and 66.8%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Due to increasingly improved survival after renal transplantation, de novo malignancies might soon become the main cause of intermediate‐ or long‐term mortality.
Current data support an increased risk of renal cell carcinoma in renal transplant recipients in a particularly aggressive way, but low tendency for metachronous contralateral evolution.
With continuous radiological follow‐ups, acceptable oncological outcome can be achieved. Graft tumours may have a favourable prognosis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.