Host use and selection by herbivores are often determined by host chemistry. Lichen secondary chemicals frequently have been assumed to have a defensive role against herbivores similar to that of higher plants, but thus far there is only circumstantial evidence of the adverse effect of lichen secondary chemicals on specialized lichen‐feeders. We studied the impact of lichen secondary metabolites on performance and host preference of lichenivorous larvae of the moth Eilema depressum using a recently developed manipulation method that allows the removal of a major part of lichen secondary metabolites from the extracellular space of the lichen thallus without harming their primary metabolism. All larvae died on intact thalli of Vulpicida pinastri and Hypogymnia physodes, whereas, after extraction of most of the lichens' secondary chemicals (e.g., pinastric and physodic acids, respectively), survival of neonate larvae ranged between 75% and 85%. In turn, atranorin, the major secondary metabolite in the cortical layer of Parmelia sulcata, merely retarded the growth of larvae during their first days, but had no long‐term impact on survival or performance of larvae. In preference experiments, treated thalli with lowered concentrations of lichen secondary metabolites, with the exception of Xanthoria parietina, were preferred to intact thalli containing secondary chemicals. Our results show that lichen secondary metabolites may act, at natural concentrations, as strong antiherbivore compounds against E. depressum larvae and may play an important role in their host selection.
Separating genetic and environmental causes of the latitudinal differences among populations is crucial when evaluating the potential for microevolutionary responses to the changing environment. We studied among‐population and environmental components of variation in several life‐history traits of a lichen‐feeding moth Eilema depressum when offspring of replicate Swiss and Finnish females were reared in a common‐garden factorial experiment. A partial second generation was produced only among Swiss larvae, more likely so at higher temperature regime and higher host quality, and more frequently among the offspring of particular females. Growth rates of larvae that chose the diapause development were higher in northern individuals. Our results thus reveal adaptive differences between latitudinal populations in studied life‐history traits, allowing to expect rapid adaptation of the species to further environmental changes. In contrast, invariable responses of the growth rates of the larvae to temperature and host quality support the idea that some basic parameters of insect growth show a high degree of evolutionary conservatism.
According to life‐history theory, longer development time may result in bigger adults. However, reaction norms describing age and size at maturity often follow an L‐shaped form. This relationship is attributable to the simple notion that slowly growing individuals may not lengthen their development excessively after the maturation decision has been made, for example, when development is time limited in seasonal environments. In arthropods, growth occurs within instars, and thus the optimal growth strategy might be mediated by the phenotypic adjustment of instar numbers. We studied the relationship between age and size at maturity of a lichen‐feeding moth, Eilema depressum (Esper) (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae: Lithosiinae), and the variability of instar numbers in relation to achieved adult body mass and time used for maturation. A positive relationship between age and size at maturity was found across developmental pathways and a negative one within the developmental pathways. Directly developing larvae had higher growth rates, attained smaller pupal mass, and passed fewer instars than larvae maturing after overwintering. Host quality did not affect whether larvae matured during the remaining or the next season. High variation in the number of instars together with variable growth rates indicates high plasticity in adaptation to varying environmental conditions. Our results also confirm previous results that instar number variability may be a key characteristic mediating age and size at maturity in insects.
Abstract. 1. Egg size is often used as a proxy of egg quality although size and composition may vary, e.g. in insects egg size usually decreases as female ages. Whether this decrease in size reflects reduced concentrations of essential nutrients such as lipids and proteins of eggs laid by ageing females, or does reduced size per se explain often observed lower fitness of later laid eggs is poorly explored.2. Egg properties were compared with fitness parameters of offspring laid on the first and fourth night during the oviposition period of a capital breeding moth, Cleorodes lichenaria (Hufnagel). The study aim was to explore whether decreased egg size is caused by decreased provisioning into later laid eggs measured as egg protein and lipid concentration, and whether it results in lower fitness of later laid offspring.3. The fresh and dry weight of eggs decreased over the oviposition period, but the protein and lipid concentration remained constant. Survival of larvae was lower among the fourth night laid offspring on a low quality host Parmelia sulcata Taylor compared to a high quality host Ramalina fraxinea (L.) Ach. No differences were observed in egg fertility or hatchability, neonate survival without food and pupal mass between the offspring produced on different nights.4. Decreased survival of offspring produced later was rather attributable to absolute provisioning (i.e. lower weight of eggs) than relative provisioning (i.e. decreased concentrations of nutrients in eggs). It is argued that lower survival of later laid smaller eggs on low quality diet is likely attributable to physical and chemical characteristics of host lichens and/or physical properties of tiny neonate larvae.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.