Purpose Copy number variants (CNVs) have emerged as a major cause of human disease such as autism and intellectual disabilities. Because CNVs are common in normal individuals, determining the functional and clinical significance of rare CNVs in patients remains challenging. The adoption of whole-genome chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) as a first-tier diagnostic test for individuals with unexplained developmental disabilities provides a unique opportunity to obtain large CNV datasets generated through routine patient care. Methods A consortium of diagnostic laboratories was established [the International Standards for Cytogenomic Arrays (ISCA) consortium] to share CNV and phenotypic data in a central, public database. We present the largest CNV case-control study to date comprising 15,749 ISCA cases and 10,118 published controls, focusing our initial analysis on recurrent deletions and duplications involving 14 CNV regions. Results Compared to controls, fourteen deletions, and seven duplications were significantly overrepresented in cases, providing a clinical diagnosis as pathogenic. Conclusion Given the rapid expansion of clinical CMA testing, very large datasets will be available to determine the functional significance of increasingly rare CNVs. This data will provide an evidenced-based guide to clinicians across many disciplines involved in the diagnosis, management, and care of these patients and their families.

Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome (WHS) is caused by deletions involving chromosome region 4p16.3. The minimal diagnostic criteria include mild-to-severe mental retardation, hypotonia, growth delay and a distinctive facial appearance. Variable manifestations include feeding difficulties, seizures and major congenital anomalies. Clinical variation may be explained by variation in the size of the deletion. However, in addition to having a deletion involving 4p16.3, previous studies indicate that approximately 15% of WHS patients are also duplicated for another chromosome region due to an unbalanced translocation. It is likely that the prevalence of unbalanced translocations resulting in WHS is underestimated since they can be missed using conventional chromosome analyses such as karyotyping and WHS-specific fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Therefore, we hypothesized that some of the clinical variation may be due to an unrecognized and unbalanced translocation. Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) is a new technology that can analyze the entire genome at a significantly higher resolution over conventional cytogenetics to characterize unbalanced rearrangements. We used aCGH to analyze 33 patients with WHS and found a much higher than expected frequency of unbalanced translocations (15/33, 45%). Seven of these 15 cases were cryptic translocations not detected by a previous karyotype combined with WHS-specific FISH. Three of these 15 cases had an unbalanced translocation involving the short arm of an acrocentric chromosome and were not detected by either aCGH or subtelomere FISH. Analysis of clinical manifestations of each patient also revealed that patients with an unbalanced translocation often presented with exceptions to some expected phenotypes.

Paternal duplications of chromosome region 11p15 can result in Beckwith-Weidemann syndrome (BWS), whereas maternal duplications of the same region on 11p15 can result in Russell-Silver syndrome (RSS). These two syndromes have numerous opposing phenotypes, especially with regards to growth parameters. The differences in the phenotype are proposed to be due to altered dosage of imprinted genes that control growth within this region of 11p15. Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome (WHS) is due to deletions of a region in 4p16.3 and there is no known parent-of-origin effect for deletions of the WHS critical region, and no genes are known to be imprinted in this region. We report on three individuals with very similar unbalanced translocations resulting in a derivative chromosome 4 with both a deletion of 4p16.3 and a duplication of 11p15. Two of these individuals are family members with one inheriting the derivative 4 from her balanced mother and the other inheriting the derivative 4 from his balanced father. The third individual is unrelated and inherited his derivative 4 from his balanced father. While the findings of these individuals included some features of WHS and RSS or BWS, the phenotypes as an aggregate are distinct from these syndromes. The genomic and phenotypic characterization of these three individuals demonstrates how unbalanced translocations can result in the modification of chromosome duplication and deletion syndromes and identifies genomic architecture that may be responsible for mediating a recurrent translocation between 4p and 11p.

We describe the cytogenetic diagnosis using BAC- and oligonucleotide microarrays of a 16-year-old Laotian-American female, who first presented at 2 1/2 years of age with microcephaly, developmental retardation, and skeletal abnormalities of the upper limb including mild syndactyly of the second and third and the third and fourth fingers, short middle phalanges and clinodactyly of the fifth digit at the distal interphalangel joint on both hands, and symphalangism of the metacarpal-phalangeal joints of the second and fifth digits bilaterally. Her lower limbs displayed symphalangism of the metatarsal-phalangeal joint of the second, third, and fourth digits on both feet, with fusion of the middle and distal phalanges of the second and fifth digits and hallux valgus bilaterally. G-banded chromosomal study at age 4 was normal. However, comparative genomic hybridization at age 15 with the Spectral Genomics 1 Mb Hu BAC array platform indicated a microdeletion involving two BAC clones, RP11-451F14 --> RP11-12N7 at 2q31.1. The maximal deletion on initial analysis comprised the HOXD cluster, which is implicated in limb development. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using the RP11-451F14 probe confirmed the deletion. Both parents were negative for the deletion. Additional FISH using BAC RP11-387A1, covering the HOXD cluster, limited the maximal deletion to approximately 2.518 Mb, and excluded involvement of the HOXD cluster. The Agilent 44K and 244K platforms demonstrated a deletion of approximately 2,011,000 bp, which did not include the HOXD cluster. The malformations in our patient may be caused by deletion of a regulatory element far upstream of the HOXD cluster.

CGH microarray provides a likely aetiology for the clinical phenotype in many cytogenetically normal cases, and a whole genome array generally identifies copy number changes more effectively than a targeted chip alone.

Traditional parental follow-up studies would have not identified this expansion, but would have rather classified the deletion in the daughter as either de novo or benign. Only by sizing the deletion by array comparative genomic hybridisation in both the mother and the daughter was the expansion recognised. Previous assumptions about chromosome behaviour suggest that this phenomenon may have been easily missed in other cases of chromosomal deletions. Therefore, this case illustrates the need for more comprehensive analyses of parental chromosome structure when characterising an abnormality in a child.

A database of apparently benign copy number variants (bCNVs) detected by a Spectral Genomics Inc./PerkinElmer BAC array platform has been maintained through the University of Utah Comparative Genomic Hybridization laboratory since 2005. The target population for this database represents 1,275 patients with abnormal phenotypes, primarily children referred for developmental delay and mental retardation. These bCNVs are independent of any identified copy number abnormality detected. The most common 35 bCNVs observed and their frequencies are reported here, and a subset of ten of the patients studied was evaluated on a new oligonucleotide CNV array set designed by Agilent Technologies. There was a 76% concordance of calls for these 35 bCNVs detected by both array platforms in the same patients. The higher resolution of the Agilent oligonucleotide array compared to the BAC array allowed determination of the precise breakpoints of the observed CNVs, in addition to documentation of additional CNVs of smaller sizes. As expected, observed CNVs and their frequencies were generally consistent with those of other previously published and available databases, including the Database of Genomic Variants (http://projects.tcag.ca/variation/). The availability of these data should assist other clinical laboratories in the evaluation of CNVs of unknown clinical significance.

We describe two unrelated patients with mental retardation and normal karyotypes found to have relatively large homozygous deletions (>150 kb) of different regions detected by array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). Patient 1 showed a 157-214 kb deletion at 8q24.2, containing BAC clone RP11-17M8. This patient was born to phenotypically normal parents and has microcephaly, distinctive craniofacial features, brachymetacarpia, brachymetatarsia and severe mental retardation. This BAC clone is listed as a copy number variant on the Database of Genomic Variants (http://projects.tcag.ca/variation/). Heterozygosity for the deletion was found in the mother (father is deceased) and uniparental disomy of chromosome 8 was excluded. Patient 2 showed a 812-902 kb deletion at 12q21.1, containing BAC clone RP11-89P15. This region was not listed in any public database as a known variant. This patient has mild craniofacial dysmorphic features, bifid uvula, peripheral pulmonic stenosis and developmental delay. Heterozygosity for this deletion was confirmed in the phenotypically normal parents and two normal siblings, but surprisingly, homozygosity for the deletion in an apparently normal younger sibling brings into question whether this large homozygous copy number change (CNC) is causal. Homozygous deletions of CNCs have not previously been reported in association with a phenotype or mental retardation. These cases represent homozygosity for presumably benign CNCs, and while causality for the phenotypes cannot be confirmed, similar deletions are bound to be identified more frequently as aCGH is used with increasing regularity. Such homozygous deletions should be viewed as potentially clinically relevant.