No abstract

Fever of unknown origin is a common presentation in children with an extensive differential diagnosis that encompasses multiple specialties. From a hematologic standpoint, the differential includes hyperinflammatory syndrome, such as hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH), among others. Due to the rarity of HLH and nonspecific symptoms at initial presentation, specialists are often consulted later in the disease progression, which complicates disease evaluation further. Cook Children’s Medical Center (CCMC) has recently developed a multidisciplinary histiocytic disorder group that is often consulted on cases presenting with fever of unknown origin to increase awareness and potentially not miss new HLH cases. In this study, we examine the clinical presentation and workup of 13 patients consulted by the HLH work group at a single institution and describe the clinical course of 2 patients diagnosed with HLH. The goal of this project was to describe the formation of a disease-specific team and the development of a stepwise diagnostic approach to HLH. A review of the current diagnostic criteria for HLH may be warranted given findings of markers such as soluble IL2 receptor and ferritin as nonspecific and spanning multiple disciplines including rheumatology, infectious disease, and hematology/oncology.

Historically, febrile neutropenia (FN) has constituted a common but life-threatening emergency in pediatric oncology patients. As such, hygiene precautions have consistently been recommended for immunosuppressed patients. These precautions, however, were more strictly and widely adopted during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Universal mask mandates, emphasis on hand hygiene, and encouragement of social distancing were some of the many initiatives introduced in an effort to reduce transmission of the virus. There is little data available regarding whether the universal adoption of these precautions was associated with any changes in the incidence of hospitalizations for FN in pediatric oncology patients. A retrospective chart review was utilized to evaluate newly diagnosed patients admitted for FN in the first 14 months of the pandemic compared with the same time period during the previous year. During the pandemic, the admission rate for FN was 28.9%, compared with 29.1% prepandemic (P = 0.97). There was no significant difference in causative organisms when comparing time periods. In addition, the presence of a state government-enforced mask mandate was associated with an increased admission rate for FN during the pandemic period.

The application of molecular tumor profiles in clinical decision making remains a challenge. To aid in the interpretation of complex biomarkers, molecular tumor boards (MTBs) have been established worldwide. In the present study, we show that a multidisciplinary approach is essential to the success of MTBs. Our MTB, consisting of pediatric oncologists, pathologists, and pharmacists, evaluated 115 cases diagnosed between March 2016 and September 2021. If targetable mutations were identified, pharmacists aided in the evaluation of treatment options based on drug accessibility. Treatable genetic alterations detected through molecular testing most frequently involved the cell cycle. For 85% of the cases evaluated, our MTB provided treatment recommendations based on the patient’s history and results of molecular tumor testing. Only three patients, however, received MTB-recommended targeted therapy, and only one of these patients demonstrated an improved clinical outcome. For the remaining patients, MTB-recommended treatment often was not administered because molecular tumor profiling was not performed until late in the disease course. For the three patients who did receive MTB-recommended therapy, such treatment was not administered until months after diagnosis due to physician preference. Thus, the education of healthcare providers regarding the benefits of targeted therapy may increase acceptance of these novel agents and subsequently improve patient survival.