Hormonal cues regulate mammary development, but the consequent transcriptional changes and cell fate decisions are largely undefined. We show that knockout of the prolactin-regulated Ets transcription factor Elf5 prevented formation of the secretory epithelium during pregnancy. Conversely, overexpression of Elf5 in an inducible transgenic model caused alveolar differentiation and milk secretion in virgin mice, disrupting ductal morphogenesis. CD61 + luminal progenitor cells accumulated in Elf5-deficient mammary glands and were diminished in glands with Elf5 overexpression. Thus Elf5 specifies the differentiation of CD61 + progenitors to establish the secretory alveolar lineage during pregnancy, providing a link between prolactin, transcriptional events, and alveolar development.Supplemental material is available at http://www.genesdev.org.
The proliferative phase of mammary alveolar morphogenesis is initiated during early pregnancy by rising levels of serum prolactin and progesterone, establishing a program of gene expression that is ultimately responsible for the development of the lobuloalveoli and the onset of lactation. To explore this largely unknown genetic program, we constructed transcript profiles derived from transplanted mammary glands formed by recombination of prolactin receptor (Prlr) knockout or wild-type mammary epithelium with wild-type mammary stroma. Comparison with profiles derived from prolactin-treated Scp2 mammary epithelial cells produced a small set of commonly prolactin-regulated genes that included the negative regulator of cytokine signaling, Socs2 (suppressor of cytokine signaling 2), and the ets transcription factor, E74-like factor 5 (Elf5). Homozygous null mutation of Socs2 rescued the failure of lactation and reduction of mammary signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 phosphorylation that characterizes Prlr heterozygous mice, demonstrating that mammary Socs2 is a key regulator of the prolactin-signaling pathway. Reexpression of Elf5 in Prlr nullizygous mammary epithelium restored lobuloalveolar development and milk production, demonstrating that Elf5 is a transcription factor capable of substituting for prolactin signaling. Thus, Socs2 and Elf5 are key members of the set of prolactin-regulated genes that mediate prolactin-driven mammary development.
Massive tissue remodelling occurs within the mammary gland during pregnancy, resulting in the formation of lobuloalveoli that are capable of milk secretion. Endocrine signals generated predominantly by prolactin and progesterone operate the alveolar switch to initiate these developmental events. Here we review the current understanding of the components of the alveolar switch and conclude with an examination of the role of the ets transcription factor Elf5. We propose that Elf5 is a key regulator of the alveolar switch. Introduction: the alveolar switchMassive tissue remodelling within the mammary gland during pregnancy results in the formation of the secretory lobuloalveolar units in preparation for lactation. The initial proliferative phase of alveolar morphogenesis is instigated by an increase in the level of serum prolactin (Prl) and progesterone (Pg) [1]. These hormones activate the alveolar switch, a genetic program that coordinates changes in mammary epithelial cell proliferation, migration, differentiation and deletion within the many tissue types of the mammary gland. Here we review our current understanding of the genetic program controlling alveolar morphogenesis, using the mouse as a model of the human breast [2]. We then examine the role played by the ets transcription factor Elf5 in coordinating this program in epithelial cells, and propose that Elf5 is a central component of the alveolar switch. Tissue remodelling during pregnancyThe most striking aspect of mammary development during pregnancy is massive tissue remodelling. During the alveolar morphogenesis phase [3], rapid and global proliferation of the epithelial cells occurs within the ductal branches and developing alveoli. This increases both epithelial cell number and epithelial surface area, actions essential for sufficient milk production during lactation. Cell differentiation becomes dominant from mid-pregnancy as the gland moves into the secretory initiation phase [3]. The developing alveoli cleave and the alveolar cells become polarised and form a spherelike single layer of epithelial cells that envelopes a circular lumen, connected to the ductal network via a single small duct. Each individual alveolus is surrounded by a basket-like architecture of contractile myo-epithelial cells. The myoepithelium of the alveoli is discontinuous so that the luminal cells directly contact the underlying basement membrane, which forms part of the extracellular matrix. Some cells of the ductal network also contact the basement membrane. Contact is required for complete lobuloalveolar differentiation [4,5], seen morphologically by the appearance of lipid droplets [6] and by the initiation of gene expression in a defined order [7]. Nearing parturition, alveolar tight junctions close and milk and colostrum proteins move into the alveolar lumen, in preparation for active milk secretion post-partum, which marks the onset of the secretory activation phase [8] (Figure 1).The epithelial expansion is paralleled by equally dramatic changes in other tissu...
Mammary gland development is coupled to reproductive events by hormonal cues of ovarian and pituitary origin, which activate a genomic regulatory network. Identification of the components and regulatory links that comprise this network will provide the basis for defining the network's dynamic response during normal development and its perturbation during breast carcinogenesis. In this study KIBRA was identified as a transcript showing decreased expression associated with failed mammary gland development in Prlr knockout mammary epithelium. It is strongly up-regulated during pregnancy, falls during lactation and is again up-regulated during involution of the gland at weaning. A bioinformatic approach was undertaken to identify potential binding partners which interact with the WW domains of KIBRA. We show that KIBRA binds to a WW domain binding motif, PPxY, in the tyrosine kinase receptor DDR1, and dissociates upon treatment with the DDR1 ligands collagen type I or IV. In addition we show that KIBRA and DDR1 also interact with PKCz to form a trimeric complex. Finally, overexpression and knockdown studies demonstrate that KIBRA promotes the collagen-stimulated activation of the MAPK cascade. Thus KIBRA may play a role in how the reproductive state influences the mammary epithelial cell to respond to changing cell-context information, such as experienced during the tissue remodeling events of mammary gland development.
Progesterone receptor (PR) function, while essential in normal human breast, is also implicated in breast cancer risk. The two progesterone receptors, PRA and PRB, are co-expressed at equivalent levels in normal breast, but early in carcinogenesis normal levels of PRA:PRB are frequently disrupted, and predominance of one isoform, usually PRA, results. In model systems, PRA and PRB have different activities, and altering the PRA:PRB ratio in cell lines alters PR signaling. The purpose of this study was to determine whether hormonal or reproductive factors contribute to imbalanced PRA:PRB expression in breast tumors and the impact of PRA:PRB imbalance on disease outcome. The relative expression of PRA and PRB proteins was determined by dual immunofluorescence histochemistry in archival breast tumors and associations with clinical and reproductive history assessed. PRA:PRB expression was not influenced by reproductive factors, whereas exogenous hormone use (menopausal hormone treatment, MHT) favored PRB expression (p < 0.035). The PRA:PRB ratio may be a discriminator of response to endocrine therapy in the TransATAC sample collection, with high PRA:PRB ratio predicting earlier relapse for women on tamoxifen, but not anastrozole (mean lnPRA:PRB ratio; HR (95 % CI) tamoxifen 2.45 (1.20-4.99); p value 0.02; anastrozole 0.80 (0.36-1.78); p value 0.60). The results of this study show that PRA:PRB imbalance in breast cancers is not associated with lifetime endogenous endocrine and reproductive factors, but is associated with MHT use, and that PRA predominance can discriminate those women who will relapse earlier on tamoxifen treatment. These data support a role for imbalanced PRA:PRB expression in breast cancer progression and relative benefit from endocrine treatment.
The epithelium of the human breast is made up of a branching ductal-lobular system, which is lined by a single layer of luminal cells surrounded by a contractile basal cell layer. The co-ordinated development of stem/progenitor cells into these luminal and basal cells is fundamentally important for breast morphogenesis. The ovarian steroid hormones, progesterone (P) and 17β-estradiol, are critical in driving this normal breast development, yet ovarian activity has also been shown to be a major driver of breast cancer risk. We previously demonstrated that P treatment increases proliferation and augments the number of progenitor-like cells, and that the progesterone receptor (PR) is also expressed in the bipotent progenitor-enriched subfraction. Here we demonstrate that PR is expressed in a subset of CD10+ basal cells and that P stimulates this CD10+ cell compartment, which is enriched for bipotent progenitor activity. In addition, we have shown that P stimulates progenitor cells in human breast cancer cell lines and expands the cancer stem cell population via increasing the stem-like CD44+ population. As changes in cell type composition are one of the hallmark features of breast cancer progression, the demonstration that progenitor cells are stimulated by P in both normal breast and in breast cancer cells has critical implications in discerning the mechanisms of how P increases breast cancer risk.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.