No abstract

Humans express sulfotransferases (SULTs) of the SULT1A subfamily in many tissues, whilst the single SULT1A gene present in rodents is mainly expressed in liver. The food processing contaminants, 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) and 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine (PhIP), are bioactivated by human SULT1A1 and SULT1A2. FVB multiple intestinal neoplasia (Min) mice, which spontaneously develop tumors and flat aberrant crypt foci (ACF) in intestine, were crossed with transgenic FVB mice expressing human SULT1A1 and 1A2 (hSULT) in several tissues, giving rise to wild-type and Min mice with and without hSULT. One-week-old Min mice with or without hSULT were given HMF (375 or 750 mg/kg bw) or saline by gavage three times a week for 11 wk. In another experiment, the F1 generation received subcutaneous injections of 50 mg/kg bw PhIP or saline 1 wk before birth, and 1, 2, and 3 wk after birth. HMF did not affect the formation of tumors, but may have induced some flat ACF (incidence 15-20%) in Min mice with and without hSULT. No control mouse developed any flat ACF. With the limitation that these putative effects were weak, they were unaffected by hSULT expression. The carcinogenic effect of PhIP increased in the presence of hSULT, with a significant increase in both incidence (31-80%) and number of colonic tumors (0.4-1.3 per animal). Thus, intestinal expression of human SULT1A1 and 1A2 might increase the susceptibility to compounds bioactivated via this pathway implying that humans might be more susceptible than conventional rodent models.

Background: Human exposure to chemicals through the oral, dermal, or inhalation routes is significant. To assess this exposure, a human biomonitoring study was conducted in Norway to examine the plausibility of source-todose calculations for chemical mixtures. Per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) are man-made compounds used for their surfactant properties, and several are persistent and bioaccumulative. Some PFASs are toxic and are regarded as endocrine disruptors and have been shown to suppress immune function and affect cholesterol homeostasis. Using the participants from the EuroMix BM study, we set out to describe PFAS concentrations and to evaluate associations with diet and use of personal care products (PCPs). Methods: Participants (44 males and 100 females) kept detailed diaries on their food consumption and their PCP use for two non-consecutive days. All urine (24 h) and blood samples were collected at the end of each study day. Levels of 25 PFASs were analysed in serum from study day 1 using a high throughput online solid phase extraction ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method. Multivariable linear regressions were performed between each food and PCP category and each chemical and were sexstratified when the consumption of food or use of PCPs was significantly different between men and women. Results: Eight PFASs were detected in all analysed samples (PFHxS, PFHpS, PFOS, PFOA, PFNA, PFDA, PFUnDA and PFDoDA), and four PFASs were below the limit of detection (PFOPA, PFDPA, PFHxA, and EtFOSA). Several PFASs were found to be positively associated with fish consumption (PFOS, PFNA, PFUnDA, PFDoDA, PFDA, PFDS and PFTrDA). Sunscreen, mouthwash, and lip gloss/lip balm were found to be positively associated with PFASs (PFOA, PFTrDA, and PFOSA). Conclusion:The participants in the EuroMix study were exposed to PFASs through their diet and PCP use. Several foods and PCPs were found to be potential sources of exposure to PFASs.

No abstract

No abstract