Hand preference for quadrupedal and bipedal reaching in humans and rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) was examined, and the data were compared with postural reaching data that have been reported for 8 other primate species. Population-level biases were found toward use of the right hand for quadrupedal and bipedal reaching in humans and use of the left hand for quadrupedal reaching in rhesus macaques. Rhesus macaques showed a significant shift toward greater use of the right hand for bipedal vs. quadrupedal reaching. Comparisons with other species showed significant variance in the direction and strength of hand preference across reaching postures. The study noted right-hand biases for bipedal reaching in humans, great apes, and tufted capuchins and shifts toward greater use of the right hand for bipedal vs. quadrupedal reaching in great apes, tufted capuchins, and rhesus macaques. These results suggest that posture alters both the direction and strength of primate hand preference and that bipedalism may have facilitated species-typical right-handedness in humans.
This research investigated the effects of posture on lateral bias for food reaching in tufted capuchin monkeys ( Cebus apella ) by comparing hand preferences for quadrupedal and bipedal reaching. Several findings of this investigation warrant discussion. First, we found a population-level bias towards use of the right hand for bipedal reaching but not for quadrupedal reaching. Second, adults exhibited a greater right-hand preference for bipedal reaching than did immatures. Third, subjects showed a greater right-hand preference, and a greater strength of preference independent of direction, for bipedal reaching than for quadrupedal reaching. Fourth, we found a significant positive relation between the direction of hand preference for quadrupedal and bipedal reaching. We believe that capuchins provide an alternative primate model to chimpanzees for the evolution of human bipedalism and right-handedness. One implication of this model is that right-handedness emerged in hominids prior to extensive expansion of brain size and elaboration of material culture.
Tufted capuchins (Cebus apella) were provided with a task that facilitated the use and modification of sticks as probing tools. It was found that subjects aged 10 years or older at initial task exposure were less likely to use tools than were younger subjects. Furthermore, juveniles whose mothers died before the subjects were aged 3 years were less likely to use tools than were juveniles whose mothers survived through this period. The ability to use tools was not related to subject sex or to access to the tool site or raw tool materials. Subjects modified tools both before and during their use, and the relative percentage of tools modified increased with subject age. Thus, it appears that capuchins most readily acquire tool use before the age of 10 years and that early disruption of the mother-infant relationship has deleterious effects on the emergence of instrumental behavior.
1998: Laterality of hand function in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebul upellu): Comparison between tool use actions and spontaneous non-tool actions. Ethology 104, 119-125.
AbstractThis study examined hand preference for tool use and spontaneous non-tool actions in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cehus upella). We noted a lack of lateral bias across measures, and greater strength of hand preference for tool use than for self-directed or feeding activities. Animals that used tools exhibited a population-level righthand bias for self-touching whereas animals that did not use tools exhibited a lack of lateral bias for this measure. Our findings are consistent with views that hand preference is expressed more strongly for tool use than for non-tool activities, and that lateral bias for self-directed behavior is related to problem-solving skills in primates.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.