Context Direct care workers in long-term care can develop close relationships with their patients and subsequently experience significant grief after patient death (Boerner et al., 2015). Consequences of this experience for employment outcomes have received little attention. Objectives To (1) investigate staff, institutional, patient, and grief factors as predictors of burnout dimensions among direct care workers who had experienced recent patient death, (2) determine which specific aspects of these factors are of particular importance, and (3) establish grief as an independent predictor of burnout dimensions. Methods Participants were 140 certified nursing assistants and 80 homecare workers having recently experienced patient death. Data collection involved comprehensive semi-structured in-person interviews. Standardized assessments and structured questions addressed staff, patient, and institutional characteristics, grief symptoms and grief avoidance, as well as burnout dimensions (depersonalization, emotional exhaustion, and personal accomplishment). Results Hierarchical regressions revealed that grief factors accounted for unique variance in depersonalization, over and above staff, patient, and institutional factors. Supervisor support and caregiving benefits were consistently associated with higher levels on burnout dimensions. In contrast, coworker support was associated with a higher likelihood of depersonalization and emotional exhaustion. Conclusion Findings suggest that grief over patient death plays an overlooked role in direct care worker burnout. High supervisor support and caregiving benefits may have protective effects with respect to burnout, whereas high coworker support may constitute a reflection of burnout.
Background and Objectives This study examined relationships between the level of control and support and Home Health Aide’s (HHAs) job satisfaction and intent to leave the job. Research Design and Methods Data derives from a survey of 512 HHAs in Massachusetts. Logistic regression using generalized estimating equations was employed for the analysis. Dependent variables included satisfaction and intent to leave the job as a home care aide generally and satisfaction and intent to leave the job at the aide’s current agency. Results The findings showed that greater control and support on the job were important predictors of positive work outcomes, controlling for job demands and other covariates. The odds of HHAs being satisfied with their job as a home care aide increased with the degree of control, whereas the odds of HHAs being satisfied with their job at their current agency increased with the extent of support. Control was negatively associated with HHAs’ intent to leave the job as an aide; no relationship was found between control or support and HHAs’ intent to leave their current agency. Discussion and Implications The results from this study illustrate the importance for HHAs of having control and autonomy in their work, as well as the benefit of support from supervisors and the home care agency, on satisfaction and intent to leave. Expanding HHA’s ability to maintain control over their day-to-day work, as well as enhancing the supports available to them, is likely to benefit home care workers, clients, and agencies through increased retention.
Objectives-The shift towards home and community-based care, coupled with the growing prevalence of mental and behavioral health conditions, increases the demand for skilled home care workers. However, little is known about the experiences of home care aides who provide care to clients with mental and behavioral health diagnoses. The purpose of this study was to identify challenges aides face in providing care to this particular group of clients, as well as the strategies and support they utilize to complete their job responsibilities.Methods-Data from five focus groups with home care workers (N = 49) throughout Massachusetts were used to examine the experiences of home care workers providing services to adults with mental or behavioral health needs. A constant comparative method was used during analysis of the focus group transcripts.Results-Aides described a lack of prior-knowledge of challenging client behaviors, leaving them unprepared to deal with disruptions to care delivery. Aides feel unsafe or unsure providing care to someone with complex needs, made worse by a perceived lack of training and support from the broader care team. Aides develop unique strategies for accomplishing their work.Conclusion-This analysis of the aide's perspective contributes valuable, and often unheard, insight to inform what we know about providing reliable, quality and safe home care to this growing group of vulnerable adults. Implications of this convergence are discussed relative to aides.
Home health aides are members of a rapidly growing occupation and often develop close ties to patients and their family and can experience significant grief when a patient dies. Yet agencies often provide little support or structure to help staff cope during this time. For instance, home care agencies do not always notify their staff of client death and some have policies in place to prevent any follow-up contact with a deceased client’s family. Little is known about how these agency factors affect HHAs’ work experience. This mixed-method study explored the experiences of 78 HHAs working either at an agency with a restrictive policy regarding contact with a client’s family after client death or an agency without such a policy in place. Data was collected through semi-structured in-person interviews. Employment outcomes included various aspects of job satisfaction and intention to change jobs. HHAs’ responses to client death were assessed with measures of grief and grief processing, and with open-ended questions exploring their experiences in this context. Findings indicated that HHAs from the restrictive agency were significantly more likely to be considering other job options. They also reported significantly lower satisfaction with received supervision, and significantly less grief processing activity. Findings suggest that HHAs from the agency without a contact restrictive policy had a more positive experience at work and more opportunity to process the client’s death.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.