Background Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders have become a significant life-threatening issue due to its increased incidence, morbidity and mortality. Several studies have tried to identify the risk factors for PAS disorders. The ideal management for PAS disorders is a matter of debate. The study objectives were to evaluate the incidence and risk factors of PAS disorders and to compare different management strategies at a tertiary referral hospital, Minia, Egypt. Methods This prospective study included 102 women diagnosed with PAS disorders admitted to Minia Maternity university hospital, Egypt between January 2017 to August 2018. These cases were categorized into three groups according to the used approach for management: Group (A) , ( n = 38) underwent cesarean hysterectomy, group (B) , ( n = 48) underwent cesarean section (CS) with cervical inversion and ligation of both uterine arteries and group (C) , ( n = 16): the placenta was left in place. Results The incidence of PAS disorders during the study period was 9 / 1000 maternities (0.91%). The mean age of cases was 32.4 ± 4.2 years, 60% of them had a parity ≥3 and 82% of them had ≥2 previous CSs. Also, 1/3 of them had previous history of placenta previa. Estimated blood loss (EBL) and blood transfusion in group A were significantly higher than other groups. Group (C) had higher mean hospital stay duration. Group A was associated with significantly higher complication rate. Conclusions The incidence of PAS disorders was 0.91%. Maternal age > 32 years, previous C.S. (≥ 2), multiparity (≥ 3) and previous history of placenta previa were risk factors. The management of PAS disorders should be individualized. Women with PAS disorders who completed their family should be offered cesarean hysterectomy. Using the cervix as a tamponade combined with bilateral uterine artery ligation appears to be a safe alternative to hysterectomy in patients with focal placenta accreta and low parity desiring future fertility. Patients with diffuse placenta accreta keen to preserve the uterus could be offered the option of leaving the placenta aiming at conservative management after proper counseling. Trial registration Registered 28th October 2015, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02590484 .

BackgroundPlacenta previa is major obstetric surgical risk as it is associated with higher percentage of intraoperative and postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), increased requirement of blood transfusion and further surgical procedures. The current study aimed to evaluate uterine artery ligation prior to uterine incision as a procedure to minimize blood loss during cesarean section in patients with central placenta previa.MethodsOne hundred and four patients diagnosed with central placenta previa antenatally and planned to have elective caesarean section were recruited from the antenatal clinic at Minia Maternity University hospital. Patients were randomly allocated into either ligation group or control group.ResultsBoth groups were similar regarding demographic features and preoperative risk factors for bleeding. The intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the ligation group as compared with the control group (569.3 ± 202.1 mL vs. 805.1 ± 224.5 mL respectively, p = 0.002). There was a significant increase in the requirement for blood transfusion in the control group as compared with the ligation group (786 ± 83 mL vs. 755 ± 56 mL respectively, p = 0.03) Three cases in the control group required further surgical interventions to control intraoperative bleeding, while no cases in the ligation required further surgical techniques and that was statistically significant (p = 0.001).ConclusionUterine artery ligation prior to uterine incision may be a helpful procedure to minimize intraoperative and postpartum blood loss in cases with central placenta previa.Trial registrationRetrospectively registered in ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02002026- December 8, 2013.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-018-1989-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

This article has been retracted. Please see the Retraction Notice for more detail: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1989-5.

Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of Ritodrine and Progesterone for maintenance tocolysis after arrested preterm labour for prolongation of pregnancy and prevention of recurrence of preterm labour.Type of the study: Comparative study.Setting: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Minia University, Minia, Egypt. Patients and methods:60 patients attended and admitted from the outpatient clinic of the Obstetric department in Minia University Hospitals with preterm labor symptoms between 28 and 37 weeks gestation which were divided into two groups and assigned for the following drugs:Group A: 30 patients received oral ritodrine (yutopar) Pharco pharmaceuticals. Group B: 30 patients received progesterone vaginal suppository (prontogest 400 IBSA).Results: The present study, showed that there is overall difference between progesterone, and ritodrine, in their efficacy as maintenance tocolysis for prevention of recurrence of preterm labor. As we discuss in our study progesterone has the upper hand on ritodrine in maintenance tocolysis. Conclusion:We would only comment that progesterone looks like a promising drug in this regard and further large studies are required to establish this fact.