No abstract

Telaprevir (TVR) was approved by the FDA in May 2011 for the treatment of hepatitis C. This protease inhibitor converts into two diastereomers with significant difference in antiviral activity. Clinical efficacy has been correlated with serum concentrations. Therefore, a sensitive and selective high-performance liquid chromatographic method for the simultaneous determination of both clinically relevant diastereomers of TVR was developed. Linearity ranged from 20 to 10,000 ng/mL. The coefficients of variation were <7.3%, and accuracy was between −4.0 and 5.4%. In 105 clinical samples, both diastereomers of TVR had a high degree of correlation to each other, but concentrations showed a broad range and an increase during therapy.

The individualized treatment strategy according to time to bDNA negativity failed to provide comparable efficacy compared with the standard of care. The inferiority of the individualized protocol may be explained by the use of a less sensitive HCV RNA assay, and also by underestimation of the importance of baseline viremia.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infected patients often take multiple co-medications to treat adverse events related to HCV therapy, or to manage other co-morbidities. Drug-drug interactions associated with this polypharmacy are relatively new to the field of HCV pharmacotherapy. With the advent of the direct-acting antivirals telaprevir and boceprevir, which are both substrates and inhibitors of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A iso-enzyme, knowledge and awareness of drug-drug interactions have become a cornerstone in the evaluation of patients starting and continuing HCV combination therapy. In our opinion, an overview of conducted drug-drug interaction studies and a list of contraindicated medications is not enough for the clinical management of these drug-drug interactions. Knowledge of pharmacokinetic profiles and concentration-effect relationships is key for the interpretation of these data, and insight into how to manage these interactions (e.g., dose adjustments, safe alternatives and therapeutic drug monitoring) is of equal importance. This review provides a practical overview of the safe and effective management of these clinical challenges.

Purpose Knowledge regarding patients’ clinical condition at severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) detection is sparse. Data in the international, multicenter Lean European Open Survey on SARS-CoV-2-Infected Patients (LEOSS) cohort study may enhance the understanding of COVID-19. Methods Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of SARS-CoV-2-infected patients, enrolled in the LEOSS cohort study between March 16, 2020, and May 14, 2020, were analyzed. Associations between baseline characteristics and clinical stages at diagnosis (uncomplicated vs. complicated) were assessed using logistic regression models. Results We included 2155 patients, 59.7% (1,287/2,155) were male; the most common age category was 66–85 years (39.6%; 500/2,155). The primary COVID-19 diagnosis was made in 35.0% (755/2,155) during complicated clinical stages. A significant univariate association between age; sex; body mass index; smoking; diabetes; cardiovascular, pulmonary, neurological, and kidney diseases; ACE inhibitor therapy; statin intake and an increased risk for complicated clinical stages of COVID-19 at diagnosis was found. Multivariable analysis revealed that advanced age [46–65 years: adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.73, 95% CI 1.25–2.42, p = 0.001; 66–85 years: aOR 1.93, 95% CI 1.36–2.74, p < 0.001; > 85 years: aOR 2.38, 95% CI 1.49–3.81, p < 0.001 vs. individuals aged 26–45 years], male sex (aOR 1.23, 95% CI 1.01–1.50, p = 0.040), cardiovascular disease (aOR 1.37, 95% CI 1.09–1.72, p = 0.007), and diabetes (aOR 1.33, 95% CI 1.04–1.69, p = 0.023) were associated with complicated stages of COVID-19 at diagnosis. Conclusion The LEOSS cohort identified age, cardiovascular disease, diabetes and male sex as risk factors for complicated disease stages at SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis, thus confirming previous data. Further data regarding outcomes of the natural course of COVID-19 and the influence of treatment are required.

Background and Aims ARC‐520, the first an RNA interference (RNAi) therapeutic, was designed to reduce all RNA transcripts derived from covalently closed circular DNA, leading to a reduction in viral antigens and hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA. Approach and Results We aimed to evaluate the depth of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) decline in response to multiple doses of ARC‐520 compared to placebo (PBO) in two randomized, multicenter studies in nucleoside/nucleotide analogue reverse‐transcriptase inhibitor (NUC)–experienced patients with hepatitis B early antigen (HBeAg)–negative (E‐neg) or HBeAg‐positive (E‐pos) disease. A total of 58 E‐neg and 32 E‐pos patients were enrolled and received four monthly doses of PBO (n = 20 E‐neg, 11 E‐pos), 1 mg/kg ARC‐520 (n = 17 E‐neg, 10 E‐pos), or 2 mg/kg ARC‐520 (n = 21 E‐neg, 11 E‐pos) concomitantly with NUC. HBsAg change from baseline to 30 days after the last ARC‐520 dose were compared to PBO. Both E‐neg and E‐pos high‐dose groups significantly reduced HBsAg compared to PBO, with mean reductions of 0.38 and 0.54 log IU/mL, respectively. HBsAg reductions persisted for approximately 85 days and >85 days after the last dose in E‐neg and E‐pos patients, respectively. The low‐dose groups did not reach statistical significance in either study. E‐pos patients showed a dose‐dependent reduction in HBeAg from baseline. Mean maximum reduction was 0.23 and 0.69 log Paul Ehrlich IUs/mL in the low‐dose and high dose ARC‐520 groups respectively. ARC‐520 was well tolerated, with only two serious adverse events of pyrexia possibly related to study drug observed. Conclusions ARC‐520 was active in both E‐neg and E‐pos, NUC‐experienced HBV patients; but absolute HBsAg reductions were moderate, possibly due to expression of HBsAg from integrated HBV DNA, indicating the need for RNAi therapeutics that can target viral transcripts regardless of origin.

No abstract

Tegobuvir (GS-9190), a non-nucleoside nonstructural protein (NS)5B polymerase inhibitor, and GS-9256, an NS3 serine protease inhibitor, individually have activity against hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1. The antiviral activity of tegobuvir and GS-9256 as oral combination therapy, or together with ribavirin (RBV) or pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN) alpha-2a and RBV, was assessed in a phase II, randomized, open-label trial. Treatmentnaïve patients with genotype 1 HCV were assigned 28 days of tegobuvir 40 mg twice-daily (BID) and GS-9256 75 mg BID (n 5 16), tegobuvir and GS-9256 plus RBV 1,000-1,200 mg daily (n 5 15), or tegobuvir and GS-9256 plus Peg-IFN alpha-2a (180 lg onceweekly)/RBV (n 5 15). The primary efficacy endpoint was rapid virologic response (RVR), with HCV RNA <25 IU/mL at day 28. After 28 days, all patients received Peg-IFN/RBV. All patients with viral rebound or nonresponse, defined as >0.5-log 10 increase in HCV RNA from nadir or <2-log decrease at day 5, initiated Peg-IFN/RBV immediately. Median maximal reductions in HCV RNA were 24.1 log 10 IU/mL for tegobuvir/GS-9256, 25.1 log 10 IU/mL for tegobuvir/GS-9256/RBV, and 25.7 log 10 IU/mL for tegobuvir/ 9256/Peg-IFN/RBV. RVR was observed in 7% (1 of 15) of patients receiving tegobuvir/ GS-9256, 38% (5 of 13) receiving tegobuvir/GS-9256/RBV, and 100% (14 of 14) receiving tegobuvir/9256/PEG-IFN/RBV. The addition of Peg-IFN/RBV at day 28 or earlier resulted in HCV RNA <25 IU/mL at week 24 in 67% (10 of 15), 100% (13 of 13), and 94% (13 of 14) of patients in the three treatment groups. Transient elevations in serum bilirubin occurred in all treatment groups. Conclusion: In genotype 1 HCV, adding RBV or RBV with Peg-IFN provides additive antiviral activity to combination therapy with tegobuvir and GS-9256. (HEPATOLOGY 2012;55:749-758) F or the past decade, the standard of care for patients with chronic infection with genotype 1 hepatitis C virus (HCV) has been 48 weeks of pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN) alpha and ribavirin (RBV). Observed rates of sustained virologic response (SVR) with Peg-IFN and RBV therapy are 40%-52%. [1][2][3][4] However, the addition of the HCV nonstructural protein (NS)3 serine protease inhibitors, telaprevir or