PPC teams currently serve a diverse cohort of children and young adults with life-threatening conditions. In contrast to the reported experience of adult-oriented palliative care teams, most PPC patients are alive for more than a year after initiating PPC.

This retrospective study analysed data for 703 children who died from 2000 to 2006 to examine where children with a broad range of progressive, life-limiting illnesses actually die when families are able to access hospital, paediatric hospice facility and care at home. There was an overall even distribution for location of death in which 35.1% of children died at home, 32.1% died in a paediatric hospice facility, 31.9% in hospital and 0.9% at another location. Previous research suggests a preference for home as the location of death, but these studies have primarily focused on adults, children with cancer or settings without paediatric hospice facilities available as an option. Our results suggest that the choice of families for end-of-life care is equally divided amongst all three options. Given the increasing numbers of children's hospices worldwide, these findings are important for clinicians, care managers and researchers who plan, provide and evaluate the care of children with life-limiting illness.

In this 3-year prospective grounded theory study in three pediatric settings, we aimed to develop a conceptualization of best practice health care providers (BPHCPs) in interaction with parents of children with complex, chronic, life-threatening conditions. Analysis of semistructured interviews with 34 parents and 80 health care professionals (HCPs) and 88 observation periods of HCP/parent interactions indicated that BPHCPs shared a broad worldview; values of equity, family-centered care, and integrity; and a commitment to authentic engagement. BPHCPs engaged in direct care activities, in connecting behaviors, and in exquisitely attuning to particularities of the situation in the moment, resulting in positive outcomes for parents and HCPs. By focusing on what HCPs do well, findings showed that not only is it possible for HCPs to practice in this way, but those who do so are also recognized as being the best at what they do. We provide recommendations for practice and initial and ongoing professional education.

Advances in pediatric care have not provided the interdisciplinary support services required by those young adults with pediatric life-threatening conditions (pedLTCs) who live beyond childhood but have limited expectations to live past early adulthood. These young adults, the first generation to live into adulthood, face multiple challenges transitioning from a plethora of pediatric palliative services to scant adult health services. In a case study, using an innovative bulletin board focus group, we describe the complex interplay of the health, education, and social service sectors in this transition. Our descriptions include system deficits and strengths and the young adults' resilience and coping strategies to overcome those deficits and move forward with their lives. Young adults with pedLTC need knowledgeable providers, coordinated and accessible services, being respected and valued, and services and supports that promote independence. We recommend implementation of multidisciplinary solutions that are focused on young adult priorities to ensure seamless access to resources to support these young adults' health, educational, vocational, and social goals. The input and voice of young adults in the development of these services are imperative to ensure that multisystem services support their needs and life goals.

These children experience multiple symptoms that have been previously documented individually, but not collectively. Effective interventions are needed to reduce their symptom burden. Future longitudinal analyses will examine which disease-modifying interventions improve, or do not improve, symptom burden.

I Background: Pediatric palliative care is increasingly recognized to be a specialized type of care requiring specific skills and knowledge, yet, as found in several countries, there is little available research evidence on which to base care. Objectives: The goal of the project was to achieve consensus among palliative care practitioners and researchers regarding the identification of pertinent lines of research. Method: A Delphi technique was used with an interdisciplinary panel (n=14-16) of researchers and frontline clinicians in pediatric palliative care in Canada. Results: Four priority research questions were identified: What matters most for patients and parents receiving pediatric palliative services? What are the bereavement needs of families in pediatric palliative care? What are the best practice standards in pain and symptom management? What are effective strategies to alleviate suffering at the end of life? Conclusions: These identified priorities will provide guidance and direction for research efforts in Canada, and may prove useful in providing optimal care to patients and families in pediatric palliative care. Resume I Contexte: De plus en plus les soins palliatifs pediatrlques sont reconnus comme etant une approche de soins specialises necessltant des connaissances et des hablletes particulieres. Cependant, comme nous I'avons constate dans plusieurs pays, iI existe peu de resultats de recherche sur lesquels on peut s'appuyer pour juger du bien-fonds de ces soins. Objectif: Le but de ce projet etait de pouvoir atteindre un concensus chez les professionels de la sante et les chercheurs en soins palliatifs afin de determiner et d'identifier des objectifs de recherche. Methode: Nous avons utilise la methode Delphi et avons ainsi recrute un panel interdisciplinaire (n=14-16) compose de chercheurs et de c1iniciens de premiere ligne engages en soins palliatifs au Canada. Resultats: Les quatres questions ldentifiees comme etant prioritaires pour la recherche en ce dornalne sont les suivantes : Quelles sont les choses les plus importantes pour les patients et leurs parents qui ont recours aux soins palliatifs? Quels sont les services de soutien dont les families endeulliees ont besoin? Quelles sont les meilleurs pratiques cliniques pour controler la douleur et les symptomes? Quelles sont les meilleures strategies pour alleqer la souffrance en fin de vie? Les priorites ainsi identlflees pourront servir de Iignes de conduite pour diriger la recherche en ce domaine au Canada et pourront surement aider adispenser des soins palliatifs optimaux aux patients et leur famille.

A substantial number of children cared for by pediatric palliative care physicians have progressive non-malignant conditions. Some elements of their care overlap with care for children with cancer while other elements, especially prognosis and trajectory, have nuanced differences. This article reviews the population, physical-emotional and social concerns, and trajectory.

These families experience many challenges, for the patient, other individual members and the family as a whole. At least some of these challenges may be alleviated by early and organized palliative care. Effective interventions are needed to enhance symptom management for the ill child and to alleviate the various negative impacts on the family.