Background and Purpose: Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is effective for acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion (LVO) and NIHSS ≥6. However, EVT benefit for mild deficits LVOs (NIHSS<6) is uncertain. We evaluated EVT efficacy and safety in mild strokes with LVO. Methods: A retrospective cohort of patients with anterior circulation LVO and NIHSS<6 presenting within 24hours from last-seen-normal were pooled. Patients were divided into 2 groups: EVT or medical management. 90day mRS=0–1 was the primary outcome; mRS=0–2 was the secondary. Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) was the safety outcome. Clinical outcomes were compared through a multivariable logistic regression after adjusting for age, presentation NIHSS, time-last-seen-normal-to-presentation, center, IV-alteplase, ASPECTS, and thrombus location. We then performed propensity score matching as a sensitivity analysis. Results were also stratified by thrombus location. Results: 214 patients (EVT-124, medical management-90) were included from 8 US and Spain centers between January/2012 and March/2017. The groups were similar in age, ASPECTS, IV-alteplase rate and time-last-seen-normal-to-presentation. There was no difference in mRS=0–1 between EVT and medical management (55.7% versus 54.4%, respectively, aOR=1.3, 95%CI=0.64–2.64, p=0.47). Similar results were seen for mRS=0–2 (63.3% EVT versus 67.8% medical management, aOR=0.9, 95%CI=0.43–1.88, p=0.77). In a propensity matching analysis, there was no treatment effect in 62 matched pairs (53.5%EVT, 48.4% medical management; OR=1.17, 95%CI=0.54–2.52, p=0.69). There was no statistically significant difference when stratified by any thrombus location; M1 approached significance (p=0.07). sICH rates were higher with thrombectomy (5.8% EVT versus 0% medical management, p=0.02). Conclusions: Our retrospective multicenter cohort study showed no improvement in excellent and independent functional outcomes in mild strokes (NIHSS<6) receiving thrombectomy irrespective of thrombus location, with increased sICH rates, consistent with the guidelines recommending the treatment for NIHSS≥6. There was a signal towards benefit with EVT only in M1 occlusions; however this needs to be further evaluated in future RCTs.

IMPORTANCE The efficacy and safety of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in patients with large ischemic cores remains unknown, to our knowledge. OBJECTIVE To compare outcomes in patients with large ischemic cores treated with EVT and medical management vs medical management alone. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This prespecified analysis of the Optimizing Patient's Selection for Endovascular Treatment in Acute Ischemic Stroke (SELECT) trial, a prospective cohort study of imaging selection that was conducted in 9 US comprehensive stroke centers, enrolled patients between January 2016 and February 2018, and followed them up for 90 days. Patients with moderate to severe stroke and anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion presenting up to 24 hours from the time they were last known to be well were eligible for the cohort. Of these, patients with large ischemic cores on computed tomography (CT) (Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score <6) or CT perfusion scanning (a volume with a relative cerebral blood flow <30% of Ն50 cm 3) were included in analyses. EXPOSURES Endovascular thrombectomy with medical management (MM) or MM only. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Functionaloutcomesat90dayspermodifiedRankinscale;safety outcomes (mortality, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, and neurological worsening). RESULTS A total of 105 patients with large ischemic cores on either CT or CT perfusion images were included: 71 with Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Scores of 5 or less (EVT, 37; MM, 34), 74 with cores of 50 cm 3 or greater on CT perfusion images (EVT, 39; MM, 35), and 40 who had large cores on both CT and CT perfusion images (EVT, 14; MM, 26). The median (interquartile range) age was 66 (60-75) years; 45 patients (43%) were female. Nineteen of 62 patients (31%) who were treated with EVT achieved functional independence (modified Rankin Scale scores, 0-2) vs 6 of 43 patients (14%) treated with MM only (odds ratio [OR], 3.27 [95% CI, 1.11-9.62]; P = .03). Also, EVT was associated with better functional outcomes (common OR, 2.12 [95% CI, 1.05-4.31]; P = .04), less infarct growth (44 vs 98 mL; P = .006), and smaller final infarct volume (97 vs 190 mL; P = .001) than MM. In the odds of functional independence, there was a 42% reduction per 10-cm 3 increase in core volume (adjusted OR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.39-0.87]; P = .007) and a 40% reduction per hour of treatment delay (adjusted OR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.36-0.99]; P = .045). Of 10 patients who had EVT with core volumes greater than 100 cm 3 , none had a favorable outcome. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Although the odds of good outcomes for patients with large cores who receive EVT markedly decline with increasing core size and time to treatment, these data suggest potential benefits. Randomized clinical trials are needed.

Objective The primary imaging modalities used to select patients for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) are noncontrast computed tomography (CT) and CT perfusion (CTP). However, their relative utility is uncertain. We prospectively assessed CT and CTP concordance/discordance and correlated the imaging profiles on both with EVT treatment decisions and clinical outcomes. Methods A phase 2, multicenter, prospective cohort study of large‐vessel occlusions presented up to 24 hours from last known well was conducted. Patients received a unified prespecified imaging evaluation (CT, CT angiography, and CTP with Rapid Processing of Perfusion and Diffusion software mismatch determination). The treatment decision, EVT versus medical management, was nonrandomized and at the treating physicians’ discretion. An independent, blinded, neuroimaging core laboratory adjudicated favorable profiles based on predefined criteria (CT:Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score ≥ 6, CTP:regional cerebral blood flow (<30%) < 70ml with mismatch ratio ≥ 1.2 and mismatch volume ≥ 10ml). Results Of 4,722 patients screened from January 2016 to February 2018, 361 patients were included. Two hundred eighty‐five (79%) received EVT, of whom 87.0% had favorable CTs, 91% favorable CTPs, 81% both favorable profiles, 16% discordant, and 3% both unfavorable. Favorable profiles on the 2 modalities correlated similarly with 90‐day functional independence rates (favorable CT = 56% vs favorable CTP = 57%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.40–9.01, p = 0.41). Having a favorable profile on both modalities significantly increased the odds of receiving thrombectomy as compared to discordant profiles (aOR = 3.97, 95% CI = 1.97–8.01, p < 0.001). Fifty‐eight percent of the patients with favorable profiles on both modalities achieved functional independence as compared to 38% in discordant profiles and 0% when both were unfavorable (p < 0.001 for trend). In favorable CT/unfavorable CTP profiles, EVT was associated with high symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) (24%) and mortality (53%) rates. Interpretation Patients with favorable imaging profiles on both modalities had higher odds of receiving EVT and high functional independence rates. Patients with discordant profiles achieved reasonable functional independence rates, but those with an unfavorable CTP had higher adverse outcomes. Ann Neurol 2020;87:419–433

IMPORTANCEA direct to angiography (DTA) treatment paradigm without repeated imaging for transferred patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) may reduce time to endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). Whether DTA is safe and associated with better outcomes in the late (>6 hours) window is unknown. Also, DTA feasibility and effectiveness in reducing time to EVT during on-call vs regular-work hours and the association of interfacility transfer times with DTA outcomes have not been established. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the functional and safety outcomes of DTA vs repeated imaging in the different treatment windows and on-call hours vs regular hours. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSThis pooled retrospective cohort study at 6 US and European comprehensive stroke centers enrolled adults (aged Ն18 years) with anterior circulation LVO (internal cerebral artery or middle cerebral artery subdivisions M1/M2) and transferred for EVT within 24 hours of the last-known-well time from January 1, 2014, to February 29, 2020.EXPOSURES Repeated imaging (computed tomography with or without computed tomographic angiography or computed tomography perfusion) before EVT vs DTA.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Functional independence (90-day modified Rankin Scale score, 0-2) was the primary outcome. Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, mortality, and time metrics were also compared between the DTA and repeated imaging groups.

Machine Learning (ML) through pattern recognition algorithms is currently becoming an essential aid for the diagnosis, treatment, and prediction of complications and patient outcomes in a number of neurological diseases. The evaluation and treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke (AIS) have experienced a significant advancement over the past few years, increasingly requiring the use of neuroimaging for decision-making. In this review, we offer an insight into the recent developments and applications of ML in neuroimaging focusing on acute ischemic stroke.

Background and Purpose: Time elapsed from last-known well (LKW) and baseline imaging results are influential on endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) outcomes. Methods: In a prospective multicenter cohort study of imaging selection for endovascular thrombectomy (SELECT [Optimizing Patient’s Selection for Endovascular Treatment in Acute Ischemic Stroke], the early infarct growth rate (EIGR) was defined as ischemic core volume on perfusion imaging (relative cerebral blood flow<30%) divided by the time from LKW to imaging. The optimal EIGR cutoff was identified by maximizing the sum of the sensitivity and specificity to correlate best with favorable outcome and to improve its the predictability. Patients were stratified into slow progressors if EIGR<cutoff and fast progressors if EIGR≥the optimal cutoff. Good collaterals were defined on computed tomography perfusion as a hypoperfusion intensity ratio <0.4 and on computed tomography angiography as collateral score >2. The primary outcome was 90-day functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score =0–2). Results: Of 445 consented, 361 (285 EVT, 76 medical management only) patients met the study inclusion criteria. The optimal EIGR was <10 mL/h; 200 EVT patients were slow and 85 fast progressors. Fast progressors had a higher median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (19 versus 15, P <0.001), shorter time from LKW to groin puncture (180 versus 266 minutes, P <0.001). Slow progressors had better collaterals on computed tomography perfusion: hypoperfusion intensity ratio (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 5.11 [2.43–10.76], P <0.001) and computed tomography angiography: collaterals-score (aOR: 4.43 [1.83–10.73], P =0.001). EIGR independently correlated with functional independence after EVT, adjusting for age, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, time LKW to groin puncture, reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score of ≥2b), IV-tPA (intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator), and transfer status (aOR: 0.78 [0.65–0.94], P =0.01). Slow progressors had higher functional independence rates (121 [61%] versus 30 [35%], P <0.001) and had 3.5 times the likelihood of achieving modified Rankin Scale score =0–2 with EVT (aOR=2.94 [95% CI, 1.53–5.61], P =0.001) as compared to fast progressors, who had substantially worse clinical outcomes both in early and late time window. The odds of good outcome decreased by 14% for each 5 mL/h increase in EIGR (aOR, 0.87 [0.80–0.94], P <0.001) and declined more rapidly in fast progressors. Conclusions: The EIGR strongly correlates with both collateral status and clinical outcomes after EVT. Fast progressors demonstrated worse outcomes when receiving EVT beyond 6 hours of stroke onset as compared to those who received EVT within 6 hours. Registration: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02446587.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is associated with hypercoagulability. We sought to evaluate the demographic and clinical characteristics of cerebral venous thrombosis among patients hospitalized for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) at 6 tertiary care centers in the New York City metropolitan area. MATERIALS AND METHODS:We conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study of 13,500 consecutive patients with COVID-19 who were hospitalized between March 1 and May 30, 2020. RESULTS: Of 13,500 patients with COVID-19, twelve had imaging-proved cerebral venous thrombosis with an incidence of 8.8 per 10,000 during 3 months, which is considerably higher than the reported incidence of cerebral venous thrombosis in the general population of 5 per million annually. There was a male preponderance (8 men, 4 women) and an average age of 49 years (95% CI, 36-62 years; range, 17-95 years). Only 1 patient (8%) had a history of thromboembolic disease. Neurologic symptoms secondary to cerebral venous thrombosis occurred within 24 hours of the onset of the respiratory and constitutional symptoms in 58% of cases, and 75% had venous infarction, hemorrhage, or both on brain imaging. Management consisted of anticoagulation, endovascular thrombectomy, and surgical hematoma evacuation. The mortality rate was 25%. CONCLUSIONS:Early evidence suggests a higher-than-expected frequency of cerebral venous thrombosis among patients hospitalized for COVID-19. Cerebral venous thrombosis should be included in the differential diagnosis of neurologic syndromes associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. ABBREVIATIONS: COVID-19 ¼ coronavirus disease 2019; CVST ¼ cerebral venous sinus thrombosis; CVT ¼ cerebral venous thrombosis; SARS-CoV-2 ¼ Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus 2 C oronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is predominantly an acute respiratory disease caused by a single-stranded RNA virus known as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which originated in Wuhan, China. 1 The virus possesses a spike protein that binds to angiotensin-converting enzyme receptors, expressed on respiratory epithelium, facilitating entry into the host cell. [2][3][4] Susceptibility of organ systems to this virus may depend on the extent of expression of angiotensin-converting enzyme receptors on cell surfaces. These receptors are expressed on endothelial cells, pericytes, macrophages, glial cells, and cardiac myocytes. [2][3][4] Viral entry into these cells can lead to diverse manifestations such as acute respiratory distress syndrome, acute kidney injury, transaminitis, cardiac injury, and neurologic complications. [3][4][5][6] Neurologic symptoms include headache, confusion, hypogeusia, hyposmia, myalgias, and delirium, while neurologic complications include acute ischemic stroke, encephalitis, and Guillain-Barre syndrome. 3,[6][7][8] Postmortem data have revealed cerebral edema and partial neuronal degeneration in some patients as well. 9 Early evidence suggests an inc...

Background and Purpose— Timely access to endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) centers is vital for best acute ischemic stroke outcomes. Methods— US stroke-treating centers were mapped utilizing geo-mapping and stratified into non-EVT or EVT if they reported ≥1 acute ischemic stroke thrombectomy code in 2017 to Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Direct EVT-access, defined as the population with the closest facility being an EVT-center, was calculated from validated trauma-models adapted for stroke. Current 15- and 30-minute access were described nationwide and at state-level with emphasis on 4 states (TX, NY, CA, IL). Two optimization models were utilized. Model-A used a greedy algorithm to capture the largest population with direct access when flipping 10% and 20% non-EVT to EVT-centers to maximize access. Model-B used bypassing methodology to directly transport patients to the nearest EVT centers if the drive-time difference from the geo-centroid to hospital was within 15 minutes from the geo-centroid to the closest non-EVT center. Results— Of 1941 stroke-centers, 713 (37%) were EVT. Approximately 61 million (19.8%) Americans have direct EVT access within 15 minutes while 95 million (30.9%) within 30 minutes. There were 65 (43%) EVT centers in TX with 22% of the population currently within 15-minute access. Flipping 10% hospitals with top population density improved access to 30.8%, while bypassing resulted in 45.5% having direct access to EVT centers. Similar results were found in NY (current, 20.9%; flipping, 34.7%; bypassing, 50.4%), CA (current, 25.5%; flipping, 37.3%; bypassing, 53.9%), and IL (current, 15.3%; flipping, 21.9%; bypassing, 34.6%). Nationwide, the current direct access within 15 minutes of 19.8% increased by 7.5% by flipping the top 10% non-EVT to EVT-capable in all states. Bypassing non-EVT centers by 15 minutes resulted in a 16.7% gain in coverage. Conclusions— EVT-access within 15 minutes is limited to less than one-fifth of the US population. Optimization methodologies that increase EVT centers or bypass non-EVT to the closest EVT center both showed enhanced access. Results varied by states based on the population size and density. However, bypass showed more potential for maximizing direct EVT-access. National and state efforts should focus on identifying gaps and tailoring solutions to improve EVT-access.