The morphology of the knee joint has been proven to vary considerably amongst the various ethnic groups, genders, and morphotype of the patients. Having a normative data for a particular population subset is important as it helps to design the knee joint prosthesis that will have the best fit and size for the knees. 1) Suboptimal sizing and placement leads to various issues like patellar maltracking, persistent pain, early loosening, loss of bone stock, and increase in propensity of periprosthetic fractures. 2) Literature review revealed a striking paucity of information on anthropometric measurements of Asian knees. Most of the anthropometric data currently available for Indian knees are derived from measurements made on osteoarthritic knees. 3,4) Heidari 5) showed that the presence of osteophytes, subchondral sclerosis, bone attrition, and
Introduction
The implant of choice for two-part intertrochanteric femur fracture is still under debate. This study was done to compare the operative parameters and functional outcome of two-part intertrochanteric fractures treated by dynamic hip screw (DHS) and proximal femur nail (PFN).
Methods
Fifty-four operated cases of two-part intertrochanteric (AO 31A1) were analysed and divided into two groups based on implant used (PFN 30, DHS 24). Operative details, which include blood loss and duration of surgery, were obtained from hospital records. All patients were followed up for six months and assessed for radiographic and functional outcome. The functional outcome was calculated with modified Harris hip score and Parker mobility score.
Results
There was no significant difference in the operative parameters (p > 0.05) between DHS and PFN. The average blood loss for DHS and PFN was 202.5 ml and 198 ml respectively while operative duration was 136 min and 126 min, respectively. All patients had good functional outcome at the end of six months with average Harris hip score of 69.7 and Parker score of 8. No difference was found between the two surgeries in terms of functional outcome as well (p > 0.05).
Conclusion
There is no conclusive evidence to show that PFN is superior to DHS in the treatment of two-part intertrochanteric (31A1) fracture. Both DHS and PFN are equally effective in treatment of such fractures.
AimTo study the tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance (TT-TG) in normal Indian population and the variation of the same in relation to tibial size using computed tomography (CT) of knee.MethodsCT of 100 knees (62 males and 38 females) were assessed. TT-TG distance and maximal medio-lateral (MML) distance of tibia was measured on axial CT scans. The modified TT-TG (mTT-TG) was calculated as the ratio of TT-TG and MML.ResultsThe average TT-TG distance was 13.01 (±2.84) mm for the entire group with males and females having 12.82 (±2.95) and 13.32 (±2.66) mm, respectively (p > 0.05). The MML distance was 75.99 (±3.78) and 66.77 (±4.33) mm for males and females, respectively (p < 0.05). The average modified TT-TG was 0.18 ± 0.04. The TT-TG distance of Indian knees was similar to values obtained in Caucasian knees and higher than other Asian knees (p < 0.05).ConclusionThe average TT-TG distance in Indian population is 13.01 mm, with no difference between males and females. The ML/TT-TG ratio was 0.18. The TT-TG distance in Indian population is found to be similar to the Western population and significantly higher than other Asian population.
Background: The aim of this study was to compare the functional outcome, the patient's perception of the replaced hip joint with different bearing surfaces and to study the effect of femoral head size on joint perception as well. Methods: One hundred and ten (110) patients, who underwent primary total hip replacement with an average follow-up of 48 months (12e156 months), were assessed for their functional outcome and joint perception. The functional outcome was calculated based on Oxford hip score (OHS) and SF-36. Joint perception was categorized as to whether the replaced joint was perceived like a natural joint or artificial joint with or without restriction of movements. Results: There were 50 patients operated for ceramic on ceramic (CoC-hard-on-hard bearing), 60 patients for hard-on-soft bearing (Metal on Polyethelene-MoP 46, Ceramic on Polyethelene-CoP 14). Most of the patients with hard-on-hard bearings perceived their operated hip like a natural joint (p ¼ 0.04) compared to hard-on-soft bearings. There was no significant difference in the functional outcome (OHS, SF-36) between the two bearing surface groups (p > 0.05). There were fifty patients with 28 mm size head while remaining 60 had larger heads (>32 mm). Patients with large heads felt like natural joint compared to small heads (p ¼ 0.007).
Conclusion:The hard-on-hard bearing surfaces (CoC) and large femoral heads (32 mm, 36 mm) are perceived more like a natural joint. Different bearing surfaces do not affect the functional outcome after total hip replacement in a medium term follow up.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.