PREFACE Materials used for thermal insulation and storage, along with other construction and building envelope components, are subjected to transient thermal conditions which can include dynamically changing temperature, moisture content, surface heat transfer, specific heat, etc. In addition, most building design and energy-related standards are based on a steady-state criterion (R-values using the apparent thermal conductivity measurements). This mismatch between the steady-state principles used in design and code requirements and the dynamic operation of buildings can result in lower thermal efficiency than achievable or higher cost (due to addition of more insulation than required). This mismatch can also lead to a gross underestimation of the performance of materials that store energy under cyclic temperature conditions, for example phase change materials (PCM). Although some experimental methods for transient analysis of building envelopes have been developed, there are no standardized testing procedures available to quantitatively characterize materials and systems under dynamic conditions. Data on dynamic material characteristics are needed to improve thermal design and analysis, whole-building simulations, and energy code-related work. This led to the development of a proposed ASTM Standard Test Method for characterizing PCM products under dynamic conditions. A series of measurements are needed to determine the enthalpy storage of a test specimen over a temperature range. First, both HFMA plates are held at the same constant temperature until steady state is achieved. Steady state is defined by the reduction in the amount of energy entering the specimen from both plates, or vice-versa, to a very small and nearly constant value. Next, both plate temperatures are changed by identical amounts and held at the new temperature until steady state is again achieved. The enthalpy absorbed or released by the specimen from the time of the temperature change until steady state is reached at the new plate temperatures is recorded. Using a series of temperature step changes of 1.5 ± 0.5°C, the cumulative enthalpy stored or released over a certain temperature range is determined. The specific heats of the solid and liquid phases are determined from the slope of the sensible enthalpy storage as a function of temperature, above and below the phase change temperature range. The proposed test method requires the measurement temperature range to begin at least 10°C below the phase change temperature range and continue till 10°C above. Since the phase change temperatures may not be known a priori, preliminary tests with coarser temperature step changes are useful in estimating the required measurement temperature range. Complete details of the test method can be found in the draft standard test method document (attached as Appendix A).
The temperature-history method, proposed by Yinping et al, is a simple and
economic way to determine the main thermophysical properties of materials
used in thermal energy storage based on solid–liquid phase change. It is
based on comparing the temperature history of a phase-change material
sample and a sample of a well known material upon cooling down. In this
paper we describe a further developed evaluation procedure to determine
cp
and h
as temperature dependent values which was not the case in Yinping’s method,
based on the same experimental procedure. Given the suitability of these
properties to calculate thermal energy storage using these materials, the method
is proposed to present the results obtained in the form of enthalpy–temperature
curves. A discussion about the errors produced by this method and an
experimental improvement are proposed too.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.