Background Several predictive models have been developed to identify trauma patients who have had severe hemorrhage (SH) and may need a massive transfusion protocol (MTP). However, almost all these models define SH as the transfusion of ≥10 units of red blood cells (RBCs) within 24 hours of ED admission (aka massive transfusion, MT). This definition excludes some patients with SH, especially those who die before a 10th unit of RBCs could be transfused, which calls the validity of these prediction models into question. We show how a latent class model could improve the accuracy of identifying the SH patients. Methods Modeling SH classification as a latent variable, we estimate the posterior probability of a patient in SH based on ED admission variables (SBP, HR, pH, Hemoglobin), the 24-hour blood product utilization (plasma:RBCs and platelets: RBCs ratios), and 24-hour survival status. We define the SH subgroup as those having a posterior probability of ≥0.5. We compare our new classification of SH with that of the traditional MT using data from PROMMTT study. Results Of 1245 patients, 913 had complete data which were used in the latent class model. About 25.3% of patients were classified as SH. The overall agreement between the MT and SH classifications was 83.8%. However, among 49 patients who died before receiving the 10th unit of RBCs 41 (84%) were classified as SH. Seven of the remaining 8 (87.5%) who were not classified as SH had head injury. Conclusion Our definition of SH based on the aforementioned latent class model has an advantage of improving on the traditional MT definition by identifying SH patients who die before receiving the 10th unit of RBCs. We recommend further improvements to more accurately classify SH patients that could replace the traditional definition of MT for use in developing prediction algorithms. Level of Evidence II, Prospective
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.