No abstract

Multiple different oncogenes have been described previously to be amplified in breast cancer including HER2, EGFR, MYC, CCND1, and MDM2. Gene amplification results in oncogene overexpression but may also serve as an indicator of genomic instability. As such, presence of one or several gene amplifications may have prognostic significance. To assess the prognostic importance of amplifications and coamplifications of HER2, EGFR, MYC, CCND1, and MDM2 in breast cancer, we analyzed a breast cancer tissue microarray containing samples from 2197 cancers with follow-up information. Fluorescence in situ hybridizations revealed amplifications of CCND1 in 20.1%, HER2 in 17.3%, MDM2 in 5.7%, MYC in 5.3%, and EGFR in 0.8% of the tumors. All gene amplifications were significantly associated with high grade. HER2 (P < 0.001) and MYC amplification (P < 0.001) were also linked to shortened survival. In case of HER2, this was independent of grade, pT, and pN categories. MYC amplification was almost 3 times more frequent in medullary cancer (15.9%), than in the histologic subtype with the second highest frequency (ductal; 5.6%; P ‫؍‬ 0.0046). HER2 and MYC amplification were associated with estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor negativity (P < 0.001) whereas CCND1 amplification was linked to estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor positivity (P < 0.001). Coamplifications were more prevalent than expected based on the individual frequencies. Coamplifications of one or several other oncogenes occurred in 29.6% of CCND1, 43% of HER2, 55.7% of MDM2, 65% of MYC, and 72.8% of EGFR-amplified cancers. HER2/MYC-coamplified cancers had a worse prognosis than tumors with only one of these amplifications. Furthermore, a gradual decrease of survival was observed with increasing number of amplifications. In conclusion, these data support a major prognostic impact of genomic instability as determined by a broad gene amplification survey in breast cancer.

CDX2 is a homeobox domain-containing transcription factor that is important in the development and differentiation of the intestines. Based on recent studies, CDX2 expression is immunohistochemically detectable in normal colonic enterocytes and is retained in most, but not all, colorectal adenocarcinomas. CDX2 expression has also been documented in a subset of adenocarcinomas arising in the stomach, esophagus and ovary. In this study, we examined CDX2 expression in a series of large tissue microarrays representing 4652 samples of normal and neoplastic tissues. Strong nuclear staining for CDX2 was observed in 97.9% of 140 colonic adenomas, 85.7% of 1109 colonic adenocarcinomas overall and 81.8% of 55 mucinous variants. There was no significant difference in the staining of well-differentiated (96%) and moderately differentiated tumors (90.8%, P ¼ 0.18), but poorly differentiated tumors showed reduced overall expression (56.0%, Po0.000001). Correspondingly, there was an inverse correlation between CDX2 expression and tumor stage, with a significant decrease in staining between pT2 and pT3 tumors (95.8 vs 89.0%, Po0.012), and between pT3 and pT4 tumors (89.0 vs 79.8%, Po0.016). Analysis of 140 locally advanced, CDX2-positive colorectal adenocarcinomas coarrayed with their matching lymph node metastases revealed that expression of this marker was retained in 82.1% of the metastases. Consistent with previous reports, CDX2 staining was observed in gastric adenocarcinomas (n ¼ 71), more commonly in the intestinal-type than the diffuse-type (28.9 vs 11.5%, Po0.05). Occasional ovarian carcinomas were positive for CDX2, including mucinous (10.5%), endometrioid (9.3%) and serous variants (2%), but expression was either very rare or absent in primary carcinomas of the lung, breast, thyroid, pancreas, liver, gallbladder, kidney, endometrium and urinary bladder. A low frequency of CDX2 expression in pancreatic and biliary carcinomas observed on the microarrays was pursued further by comparing these tumors with ampullary adenocarcinomas on conventional sections. Ampullary adenocarcinomas were more commonly positive for CDX2 (19/24, 79%) than cholangiocarcinomas (1/11, 9%) and pancreatic carcinomas (3/20, 15%). In summary, CDX2 is a sensitive and specific marker for colorectal adenocarcinoma, although its expression is decreased among higher grade and stage tumors, and it is not invariably present in metastases from positive primaries. CDX2 may also be helpful in distinguishing adenocarcinomas of the ampulla from those arising in the pancreas and biliary tree.

Previous studies in small series of patients with invasive breast cancer suggested a prognostic value of Ep-CAM overexpression in primary tumor tissue. To corroborate these findings, we performed a retrospective analysis of Ep-CAM expression using a tissue microarray containing tissue specimens from a large patient set. Ep-CAM expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry in breast cancer tissue from 1715 patients with documented raw survival data. High level Ep-CAM expression (overexpression) was found in 41.7% of tumor samples, low level expression was found in 48.0% and no expression in 10.3% of tumor samples. Ep-CAM expression predicted poor overall survival in this patient cohort (p < 0.0001). Overall survival decreased significantly with increasing Ep-CAM expression. However, in this patient sample Ep-CAM expression was not an independent prognostic marker by multivariate analysis. Subgroup analysis revealed that Ep-CAM expression was a prognostic marker in node-positive (p < 0.0001) but not in node-negative (p = 0.58) breast cancer patients. Intriguingly, Ep-CAM expression was predictive for a dismal prognosis in patients receiving adjuvant cytotoxic (p = 0.03) or hormonal therapy (p < 0.0001) but not in untreated patients (p = 0.41). In summary, this study provides strong evidence that expression of Ep-CAM is a powerful marker of poor prognosis in node-positive invasive breast carcinoma and a potential predictive marker of sensitivity to adjuvant hormonal and/or cytotoxic treatment modalities.

Tissue microarrays (TMAs) are potentially suited to find associations between molecular features and clinical outcome. Enhanced cell proliferation, as measured by Ki67 immunohistochemistry, is related to poor patient prognosis in many different tumor types. Ki67 expression shows considerable intratumoral heterogeneity. It is unclear if the TMA format is suitable for the analysis of potentially heterogeneous markers because of the small size of TMA spots. We have analyzed a breast cancer TMA containing 2,517 breast tissues, including 2,222 neoplastic and 295 normal or premalignant samples, for Ki67 labeling index (Ki67 LI) and additional markers with a known relationship to Ki67 LI by immunohistochemistry (ER, PR, Bcl-2, Egfr, p16, p53) and Fluorescence in situ hybridization (HER2, MDM2, CCND1, MYC). A high Ki67 LI was linked to tumor phenotype including grade (p < 0.0001), stage (p < 0.0001), nodal stage (p = 0.0018), and patient prognosis (p < 0.0001), elevated protein levels of p53, p16 and Egfr, reduced levels of Bcl2, ER, and PR (p < 0.0001 each), as well as amplifications of HER2, MYC, CCND1 and MDM2 (p < 0.0001 each). In summary, all expected associations between Ki67 and the analyzed molecular markers could be reproduced with high statistical significance using a TMA containing only one tissue sample per tumor, measuring 0.6 mm in diameter. We conclude that associations with cell proliferation can be reliably analyzed in a TMA format.

Background/Aims: The presenting symptom of eosinophilic esophagitis, a chronic T_H2-type inflammatory disease, is uniform dysphagia attacks. Histology reveals a dense mucosal infiltration with eosinophils. Unfortunately, endoscopic findings are often unremarkable or misleading. This study characterizes the endoscopic manifestations of eosinophilic esophagitis and analyzes the nature and clinical features of the frequently observed white alterations. Methods: Thirty adult patients (22 males, 8 females; mean age 40.6 years) with previously confirmed EE prospectively underwent a structured interview, physical examination, laboratory tests and upper endoscopy with histomorphometric examination of the esophageal mucosa. Results: On endoscopy, all patients showed mucosal abnormalities in the esophagus. Findings included an unspectacular loss of vascular pattern (93.3%) and white exudates (53.3%). Biopsies demonstrated significantly increased eosinophilia in the white exudates (108.4 vs. 14.0 cells/hpf). A significant correlation was found between white exudates and dysphagia frequency (<1 attack/week = 20%; >1 attack/ week = 70%). Conclusion: Eosinophilic esophagitis evokes at least 12 different signs resulting in an individually unique endoscopic pattern, but no disease-specific picture. White exudates correspond to foci of dense eosinophilic infiltration reflecting inflammatory activity and are associated with significantly more frequent dysphagia attacks. Both the lack of a typical endoscopic picture as well as the heterogeneity of the eosinophilic infiltration impede diagnosis.

No abstract

We thus conclude that tissue-dwelling eosinophils show different and distinct cytokine expression patterns under noninflammatory and inflammatory conditions.