BACKGROUND Adding radiotherapy (RT) to systemic therapy improves progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Whether these findings translate to EGFR-mutated NSCLC remains unknown. The SINDAS trial (NCT02893332) evaluated first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy for EGFR-mutated synchronous oligometastatic NSCLC, and randomized to up-front RT vs. no RT; we now report the pre-specified interim analysis at 68% accrual. METHODS Inclusion criteria were biopsy-proven EGFR-mutated adenocarcinoma (per amplification refractory mutation system or next generation sequencing), with synchronous (newly-diagnosed, treatment-naïve) oligometastatic (≤5 metastases; ≤2 lesions in any one organ) NSCLC without brain metastases. All patients received a first-generation TKI (gefitinib, erlotinib, or icotinib), and randomization was between no RT vs. RT (25–40 Gy in 5 fractions depending on tumor size/location) to all metastases and the primary tumor/involved regional lymphatics. The primary endpoint (intention-to-treat) was PFS. Secondary endpoints included OS and toxicities. All statistical tests were 2-sided. RESULTS A total of 133 patients (n = 65 TKI only, n = 68 TKI+RT) were enrolled (2016–2019). The median follow-up was 23.6 months. The respective median PFS was 12.5 months vs. 20.2 months (p < .001), and the median OS was 17.4 months vs. 25.5 months (p < .001) for TKI only vs TKI+RT. Treatment yielded no grade 5 events and a 6% rate of symptomatic grade 3–4 pneumonitis in the TKI+RT arm. Based on the efficacy results of this pre-specified interim analysis, the ethics committee recommended premature cessation of this trial. CONCLUSIONS As compared to a first-line TKI alone, addition of up-front local therapy using RT statistically significantly improved PFS and OS for EGFR-mutated NSCLC.

No abstract

ObjectiveAlthough Polymerase-epsilon (POLE)-mutated and mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient endometrial cancers (ECs) are considered as promising candidates for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy, selecting only these patients may exclude other patients who could potentially respond to this treatment strategy, highlighting the need of additional biomarkers for better patient selection. This study aims to evaluate potential predictive biomarkers for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy in addition to POLE mutation (POLEm) and MMR deficiency (MMRd).MethodsWe performed next generation sequencing for POLE from 202 ECs, and immunohistochemistry for MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, CD3, CD8, PD-1 and PD-L1 on full-section slides from these ECs. We assessed the association of POLEm and MMRd with clinicopathologic features, expression of check point proteins, and density of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). Prognostic impact of these immune markers was also evaluated.ResultsPOLEm, MMRd and high-grade tumors exhibited elevated level of TILs. Increased expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 was observed in MMRd and high-grade ECs. A subgroup of MMR proficient ECs also harbored increased density of TILs, and positive expression of PD-1 and PD-L1. In addition, negative expression of checkpoint proteins and high density of TILs in combination was associated with good prognosis.ConclusionsCandidates for PD-1 blockade may extend beyond POLEm and MMRd ECs, additional factors such as tumor grade, and combination of TILs levels and expression of checkpoint proteins may need to be considered for better patient selection.

No abstract