This paper reports on 32 chromophobe cell renal carcinomas observed in 697 renal cell cancers (RCC) of adults (peak in the sixth decade of life). The chromophobe cell-type differs from other types of RCC macroscopically, the cut-surface being predominantly of grey-beige colour. Histologically, there are two variants: one is the typical (light) variant (n = 22) and the other is eosinophilic (n = 10). Both variants have in common (a) reaction of the cytoplasm with Hale's acid iron colloid; (b) electron microscopic detection of cytoplasmic microvesicles (150-300 nm), frequently with 'inner vesicles', and (c) low glycogen content in comparison with the clear cell carcinoma. Immunocytochemical investigations on the intermediate filaments show a positive reaction for cytokeratins No. 18 (uniformly) and Nos. 7 and 19 (to varying extents) for both variants, whereas vimentin was not found in any of these carcinomas, in contrast to the clear-cell type. The cytomorphological grading revealed predominantly G II tumours. A lymph node metastasis was found in one patient. On the basis of the mortality curves determined, the prognosis for patients with chromophobe cell carcinomas is more favourable than that of the clear-cell type. In terms of differential diagnosis, on the one hand, the typical (light) variant of the chromophobe cell RCC must be delimited from the clear-cell RCC, and on the other hand, the eosinophilic variant must be distinguished from the chromophilic or 'granular' RCC. Microscopic, histological, histochemical, electron microscopic, and intermediate filament analysis results document that the chromophobe cell type of RCC is a distinct entity. The implications for the nomenclature of RCC, especially with regard to the 'granular' type, are discussed.
Due to its function in the rate limiting initial step of the renin-angiotensin system, renin is a particularly promising target for drugs designed to control hypertension, a growing risk to health worldwide. Despite vast efforts over more than two decades, no orally efficacious renin inhibitor had reached the market. As a result of a structure-based topological design approach, we have identified a novel class of small-molecule inhibitors with good oral blood-pressure lowering effects in primates. Further lead optimization aimed for improvement of in vivo potency and duration of action, mainly by P2' modifications at the hydroxyethylene transition-state isostere. These efforts resulted in the discovery of aliskiren (46, CGP060536B, SPP100), a highly potent, selective inhibitor of renin, demonstrating excellent efficacy in sodium-depleted marmosets after oral administration, with sustained duration of action in reducing dose-dependently mean arterial blood pressure. Aliskiren has recently received regulatory approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of hypertension.
The present study examines the effects of prolonged angiotensin II antagonism in spontaneously hypertensive rats by using an angiotensin II receptor antagonist (DuP 753) that is devoid of agonistic properties and selective for the subtype 1 of the angiotensin II (AT,) receptor. The antihypertensive effects of DuP 753 and its effects on circulating parameters of the reninangiotensin system were compared with those of a converting enzyme inhibitor (benazeprilat). To minimize any influence of differences in the pharmacokinetic properties of the two blockers, administration was by continuous intravenous infusion. The experiments were performed in conscious, freely moving rats with continuous 24-hour monitoring of blood pressure. DuP 753 (10 or 30 mg/kg/day) lowered mean arterial pressure to the same extent as benazeprilat (3 or 10 mg/kg/day) during a 48-hour period. The antihypertensive effect was sustained when the treatment was extended to 7 days (DuP 753,10 mg/kg/day, benazeprilat, 3 mg/kg/day). Neither of the compounds affected the baseline or diurnal rhythm of heart rate. Plasma concentrations of renin and angiotensin II were increased sevenfold and 10-fold, respectively, in the rats treated with DuP 753. In rats treated with benazeprilat, plasma renin concentration increased threefold, whereas angiotensin II was unchanged. Heart weights were significantly reduced to a similar extent by DuP 753 and benazeprilat Both compounds also induced a smaller but significant decrease in blood pressure in Wistar-Kyoto rats. Our results indicate that the antihypertensive effects of converting enzyme inhibitors in spontaneously hypertensive rats are mainly due to the blockade of the renin-angiotensin system. In this rat model, angiotensin II appears to play an important role in the maintenance of hypertension that is mediated via the AT, receptor. {Hypertension 1991;18:278-288) T he spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR) is an inbred strain that develops high blood pressure with increasing age and is widely used as a model of human essential hypertension.1 Similar to most patients with essential hypertension, SHR have normal or decreased plasma renin activity (PRA) and are not considered to be a renin-dependent model of hypertension. Nevertheless, angiotensin I converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors lower blood pressure in SHR and in patients with essential hypertension. 2ÂCE inhibitors not only completely prevent the development of hypertension in SHR, if administered from an early age, but also lower blood pressure in adult SHR with established hypertension. In contrast to ACE inhibitors, peptidic angiotensin II (Ang II) antagonists 4 and Ang II antibodies 5 do not consistently lower blood pressure in SHR. In addition, the plasma renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is not elevated in SHR; these observations suggest that the effects of ACE inhibitors could be due to non-Ang II-mediated mechanisms.2 -3 However, there is also evidence indicating that the effects of ACE blockade are mediated mainly via Ang II. The antihypertensive effect...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.