Objective-Functional and morphological changes of the arterial wall already present in young children with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) suggest that treatment should be initiated early in life to prevent premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and particularly safety of statin therapy in children with HeFH. Methods and Results-We performed a meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials evaluating statin therapy in children aged 8 to 18 years with HeFH. Six studies (nϭ798 children) with 12 to 104 weeks of treatment were included. Total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B were significantly reduced, whereas HDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein A1 were significantly increased by statin therapy. No statistically significant differences were found between statin-and placebo-treated children with respect to the occurrence of adverse events (RR 0.

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a prevalent (1:500 individuals) inherited disorder that strongly predisposes to premature atherosclerosis and subsequent cardiovascular disease. 1 In children with FH, atherosclerosis progression is observed before puberty. 2 Consequently, guidelines for FH treatment advocate initiation of statins in children as young as 8 years. 3 However, longterm efficacy and safety data for statin therapy initiated during childhood do not exist. We followed up a cohort of children with FH receiving statin therapy until adulthood.Methods | We conducted a cohort study of 214 children heterozygous for FH, living in the Netherlands, aged 8 to 18 years, who were randomized between 1997 and 1999 into a singlecenter, 2-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of pravastatin. 4 Results showed a significant regression of carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) after statin treatment compared with placebo.After the trial, all children received pravastatin (20-40 mg/d) and were followed up until March 2011 along with 95 unaffected siblings. Patients were instructed to adhere to the Step 2 diet. During follow-up, several patients switched to other statins. After 10 years, all participants underwent a physical examination, fasted blood sample, assessment of family and medical history, including the occurrence of adverse events,The low-density lipoprotein levels of patients with FH at follow-up did not meet current treatment standards and carotid IMT was thicker than in unaffected siblings. More robust lipid-lowering therapy or earlier initiation of statins may be required to completely restore arterial wall morphology and avert cardiovascular events later in life in this high-risk population.

In children with familial hypercholesterolemia, rosuvastatin 20 mg daily reduced LDL-C by 50%. Nonetheless, only 40% attained the consensus LDL-C target of <110 mg/dl, reflecting these patients' high baseline LDL-C levels (mean, 232 mg/dl). (Pediatric Lipid-Reduction Trial of Rosuvastatin [PLUTO]; NCT00355615).

Coadministration of ezetimibe with simvastatin was safe, well tolerated, and provided higher LDL-C reduction compared with simvastatin alone in adolescents with HeFH studied up to 53 weeks. (Effects of Ezetimibe With Simvastatin in the Therapy of Adolescents With Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia; NCT00129402).

BackgroundStatins are currently the preferred pharmacological therapy in individuals with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) with the aim to prevent premature atherosclerosis. In adults, these agents have been proven to be safe and well tolerated; however, non-adherence is a significant clinical issue.ObjectivesIn this study, we evaluated tolerability and adherence to statin therapy in young adult FH patients 10 years after this was initiated in their childhood.MethodsA questionnaire including items on medical history, adherence and reasons for discontinuation was sent to 214 young adult FH patients that initiated statin therapy at least 10 years ago. Tolerability was defined as 100 % minus the percentage of patients that discontinued statin therapy due to side effects. Adherence was defined as the extent to which patients took their medication as prescribed by their physician. We labelled patients adherent if they took 80 % or more of their pills in the month preceding our assessment.ResultsFollow-up was successful in 205 (95.8 %) subjects (age 18–30 years). A history of side effects was reported by 40 (19.5 %) of the patients, and mainly consisted of muscle complaints and gastrointestinal symptoms. Three patients (1.5 %) discontinued statin therapy because of side effects. Rhadbomyolysis or other serious adverse events were not reported. In fact, 169 (82.4 %) of 205 patients remained on statin treatment and 78.7 % (148 out of 188) were adherent. None of the patient characteristics were significantly associated with adherence.ConclusionsIndividuals with FH who started statin therapy in childhood demonstrated good adherence during ten years of treatment. Furthermore, statin therapy was well tolerated; only a small minority discontinued therapy because of side effects and the side effects that were reported were mild in nature.

Background-Autosomal dominant hypercholesterolemia (ADH) is characterized by elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and premature cardiovascular disease. Mutations in the genes encoding for low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR), apolipoprotein B (APOB), and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 (PCSK9) underlie ADH. Nevertheless, a proportion of individuals who exhibit the ADH phenotype do not carry mutations in any of these 3 genes.Estimates of the percentage of such cases among the ADH phenotype vary widely. We therefore investigated a large pediatric population with an unequivocal ADH phenotype to assess the molecular basis of hereditary hypercholesterolemia and to define the percentage of individuals with unexplained dyslipidemia. Methods and Results-We enrolled individuals with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels above the 95th percentile for age and gender and an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern of hypercholesterolemia from a large referred pediatric cohort of 1430 children. We excluded children with thyroid dysfunction, nephrotic syndrome, autoimmune disease, liver disease, primary biliary cirrhosis, and obesity (body mass index Ͼ75th percentile for age and gender), as well as children referred via a cascade screening program and those from families with a known molecular diagnosis. Of the 269 children who remained after the exclusion criteria were applied, 255 (95%) carried a functional mutation (LDLR, 95%; APOB, 5%). Conclusion-In the vast majority of children with an ADH phenotype, a causative mutation can be identified, strongly suggesting that most of the large-effect genes underlying ADH are known to date.

Altogether, the suggested relationship between severe hypercholesterolemia and enhanced atherosclerosis in offspring and possibly the mother warrants further confirmation and, consequently, studies that focus on therapeutic strategies that can safely lower cholesterol levels during pregnancy in these women.

PurposeAlthough the importance of rational prescribing is generally accepted, the teaching of pharmacotherapy to undergraduate medical students is still unsatisfactory. Because clinical teachers are an important role model for medical students, it is of interest to know whether this extends to therapeutic decision-making. The aim of this study was to find out which factors contribute to the drug choices made by medical students and their teachers (general practitioners and clinical specialists).MethodsFinal-year medical students (n = 32), and general practitioners (n = 29), lung specialists (n = 26), orthopaedic surgeons (n = 24), and internists (n = 24) serving as medical teachers from all eight medical schools in the Netherlands participated in the study. They were asked to prescribe treatment (drug or otherwise) for uncomplicated (A) and complicated (B) written patient cases and to indicate which factors influenced their choice of treatment, using a list of factors reported in the literature to influence drug prescribing.ResultsFinal-year medical students primarily based their drug choice on the factors ‘effectiveness of the drugs’ and ‘examples from medical teachers’. In contrast, clinical teachers primarily based their drug choice on the factors ‘clinical experience’, ‘effectiveness of the drugs’, ‘side effects of the drugs’, ‘standard treatment guidelines’, and ‘scientific literature’.ConclusionsMedical teachers would appear to base their drug choice mainly on clinical experience and drug-related factors, whereas final-year medical students base their drug choice mainly on examples provided by their medical teachers. It is essential that medical teachers clearly explain to their students how they arrive at a specific choice of medication since medical students tend to copy the therapeutic drug choices from their teachers, mainly because of a lack of experience. Presenting students with clinical therapeutic problems early during undergraduate training will not only give them a chance to gain experience in solving medical problems but will also give meaning to what they are studying as opposed to merely reproducing what they learn or copying what they are told.