Purpose Salvage chemotherapy followed by high-dose therapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard treatment for relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Salvage regimens have never been compared; their efficacy in the rituximab era is unknown. Patients and Methods Patients with CD20+ DLBCL in first relapse or who were refractory after first-line therapy were randomly assigned to either rituximab, ifosfamide, etoposide, and carboplatin (R-ICE) or rituximab, dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabine, and cisplatin (R-DHAP). Responding patients received high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT. Results The median age of the 396 patients enrolled (R-ICE, n = 202; R-DHAP, n = 194) was 55 years. Similar response rates were observed after three cycles of R-ICE (63.5%; 95% CI, 56% to 70%) and R-DHAP (62.8%; 95 CI, 55% to 69%). Factors affecting response rates (P < .001) were refractory disease/relapse less than versus more than 12 months after diagnosis (46% v 88%, respectively), International Prognostic Index (IPI) of more than 1 versus 0 to 1 (52% v 71%, respectively), and prior rituximab treatment versus no prior rituximab (51% v 83%, respectively). There was no significant difference between R-ICE and R-DHAP for 3-year event-free survival (EFS) or overall survival. Three-year EFS was affected by prior rituximab treatment versus no rituximab (21% v 47%, respectively), relapse less than versus more than 12 months after diagnosis (20% v 45%, respectively), and IPI of 2 to 3 versus 0 to 1 (18% v 40%, respectively). In the Cox model, these parameters were significant (P < .001). Conclusion In patients who experience relapse more than 12 months after diagnosis, prior rituximab treatment does not affect EFS. Patients with early relapses after rituximab-containing first-line therapy have a poor prognosis, with no difference between the effects of R-ICE and R-DHAP.

Dose-dense induction followed by HDT/ASCT was well tolerated and led to long-term PFS in 44% of treatment-naive patients with PTCL. This represents an encouraging outcome, particularly considering the high median age and adverse risk profile of the study population. Therefore, dose-dense induction and HDT/ASCT are a rational up-front strategy in transplantation-eligible patients with PTCL.

HDT significantly improves PFS and OS. There is no clear evidence of benefit through purging.

This phase 2 study evaluated the safety and efficacy of alemtuzumab in 22 patients with advanced mycosis fungoides/ Sé zary syndrome (MF/SS). Most patients had stage III or IV disease, reduced performance status, and severe itching. The overall response (OR) rate was 55%, with 32% of patients in complete remission (CR) and 23% in partial remission (PR). Sé zary cells were cleared from the blood in 6 of 7 (86%) patients, and CR in lymph nodes was observed in 6 of 11 (55%) patients. The effect was better on erythroderma (OR, 69%) than on plaque or skin tumors (OR, 40%) and in patients who had received 1 to 2 previous regimens (OR, 80%) than in those who had received 3 or more prior regimens (OR, 33%). Itching, self-assessed on a 0 to 10 visual analog scale, was reduced from a median of 8 before treatment to 2 at end of therapy. Median time to treatment failure was 12 months (range, 5-32؉ months). Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation (causing fever without pneumonitis and responding to ganciclovir) occurred in 4 (18%) patients. Six additional patients had suspect or manifest infection (fever of unknown origin, 3; generalized herpes simplex, 1; fatal aspergillosis, 1). One patient had fatal Mycobacterium pneumonia at 10؉ months. All serious infectious adverse events (except CMV) occurred in patients who had received 3 or more prior regimens. Progression of squamous cell skin carcinoma was noted in 1 patient.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has been shown to be comprised of at least two prognostic entities, depending on its resemblance to normal germinal center or activated B cells, using global gene expression profiling. Also, the expression patterns of bcl-6, CD10 and IRF-4 (also known as MUM1) have been suggested as alternative means of identifying the germinal-and nongerminal center (activated B-cell like) groups. In the present study, we evaluated by immunohistochemistry the expression patterns of CD10, bcl-6, IRF-4 and bcl-2 in a large material of 161 DLBCL patients. Using two different approaches, patients with germinal center phenotype displayed a significantly better survival than the nongerminal center group. Positive staining for bcl-6 or CD10 predicted for superior survival, while expression of IRF-4 alone showed no association with prognosis. Furthermore, expression of bcl-2 was associated with worse event-free survival and overall survival. In a multivariate analysis, a high international prognostic index score (3-5), non-GC phenotype and bcl-2 were independent adverse prognostic factors. Here we confirm the prognostic importance of determining the germinal-or nongerminal center phenotype in patients with DLBCL.

In relapsed DLBCL, we observed no difference between the control group and the rituximab maintenance group and do not recommend rituximab after ASCT.

Patients with peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTLs) have an extremely poor prognosis when relapsed or refractory to conventional chemotherapy. We have studied alemtuzumab, a humanized anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody, as therapy for patients with heavily pretreated and refractory PTL. Fourteen patients entered the study. All had clinical stage III or IV disease. Patients received a rapidly escalating dosage of alemtuzumab during the first week and, thereafter, 30 mg intravenously 3 times per week for a maximum of 12 weeks. Trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole and valaciclovir prophylaxis was given to all patients. The overall response rate was 36% (5 of 14). Three patients achieved a complete remission (CR) and 2 patients a partial remission. The durations of the CRs were 2, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Toxicity included cytomegalovirus reactivation in 6 patients, which was successfully treated with ganciclovir or foscarnet; pulmonary aspergillosis in 2 patients; and pancytopenia in 4 patients. Epstein-Barr virus-related hemophagocytosis was observed in 2 patients. Five patients died of causes related to the treatment, in combination with advanced disease. We conclude that alemtuzumab is active when used in patients with advanced, heavily pretreated PTL, although it is associated with significant hematologic toxicity and infectious complications. Further studies are warranted in younger patients and patients with less advanced disease. (Blood. 2004;103: 2920-2924)

The chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has been effective for patients with CD19 B-cell malignancies. Most studies have investigated the second-generation CARs with either CD28 or 4-1BB costimulatory domains in the CAR receptor. Here, we describe the first clinical phase I/IIa trial using third-generation CAR T cells targeting CD19 to evaluate safety and efficacy. Fifteen patients with B-cell lymphoma or leukemia were treated with CAR T cells. The patients with lymphoma received chemotherapy during CAR manufacture and 11 of 15 were given low-dose cyclophosphamide and fludarabine conditioning prior to CAR infusion. Peripheral blood was sampled before and at multiple time points after CAR infusion to evaluate the persistence of CAR T cells and for immune profiling, using quantitative PCR, flow cytometry, and a proteomic array. Treatment with third-generation CAR T cells was generally safe with 4 patients requiring hospitalization due to adverse reactions. Six of the 15 patients had initial complete responses [4/11 lymphoma and 2/4 acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)], and 3 of the patients with lymphoma were in remission at 3 months. Two patients are still alive. Best predictor of response was a good immune status prior to CAR infusion with high IL12, DC-Lamp, Fas ligand, and TRAIL. Responding patients had low monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs; CD14CD33HLADR) and low levels of IL6, IL8, NAP3, sPDL1, and sPDL2. Third-generation CARs may be efficient in patients with advanced B-cell lymphoproliferative malignancy with only modest toxicity. Immune profiling pre- and posttreatment can be used to find response biomarkers.