Little is known about the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of gentamicin in newborns undergoing controlled hypothermia after suffering from hypoxicÀischaemic encephalopathy due to perinatal asphyxia. This study prospectively evaluates and describes the population PK of gentamicin in these patients. METHODSDemographic, clinical and laboratory data of patients included in a multicentre prospective observational cohort study (the 'PharmaCool Study') were collected. A non-linear mixed-effects regression analysis (NONMEM ® ) was performed to describe the population PK of gentamicin. The most optimal dosing regimen was evaluated based on simulations of the final model. RESULTSA total of 47 patients receiving gentamicin were included in the analysis. The PK were best described by an allometric two compartment model with gestational age (GA) as a covariate on clearance (CL). During hypothermia the CL of a typical patient (3 kg, GA 40 weeks, 2 days post-natal age (PNA)) was 0.06 l kg À1 h À1 (inter-individual variability (IIV) 26.6%) and volume of distribution of the central compartment (V c ) was 0.46 l kg À1 (IIV 40.8%). CL was constant during hypothermia and rewarming, but increased by 29% after reaching normothermia (>96 h PNA). CONCLUSIONSThis study describes the PK of gentamicin in neonates undergoing controlled hypothermia. The 29% higher CL in the normothermic phase compared with the preceding phases suggests a delay in normalization of CL after rewarming has occurred. Based on simulations we recommend an empiric dose of 5 mg kg À1 every 36 h or every 24 h for patients with GA 36-40 weeks and GA 42 weeks, respectively. WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT• Little is known of the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of gentamicin in neonates receiving controlled hypothermia. Only a few retrospective studies have been performed to evaluate these properties. For example, conflicting data exist with regard to the changes in clearance (CL) of gentamicin in this population. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS• A description of the PK properties of gentamicin in this patient population based on prospectively gathered data was obtained.• We found a 29% higher CL during normothermia compared with the hypothermic and rewarming periods.• We suggest a new dosing regimen with which adequate peak and trough levels will be acquired.
Introduction: In phenylketonuria (PKU), a natural protein-restricted dietary treatment prevents severe cognitive impairment. Nutrient deficiencies may occur due to strict diet. This study is aimed at evaluating the dietary intake and blood concentrations of micronutrients and essential fatty acids (FA), bone mineral density (BMD) and fracture history in patients on long-term dietary treatment. Methods: Sixty early diagnosed Dutch patients (aged 1-39 years) were included in a multi-center cross-sectional study. Their dietary intake, blood concentrations of micronutrients, FA, fracture history and BMD were assessed. Results: Selenium dietary intake and serum concentrations were low in 14 and 46% of patients, respectively. The serum 25-OH vitamin D2 + D3 concentration was low in 14% of patients while 20% of patients had a low vitamin D intake. Zinc serum concentrations were below normal in 14% of patients, despite adequate intake. Folic acid serum concentrations and intake were elevated. Despite safe total protein and fat intake, arginine plasma concentrations and erythrocyte eicosapentaenoic acid were below reference values in 19 and 6% of patients, respectively. Low BMD (Z-score <-2) was slightly more prevalent in patients, but the lifetime fracture prevalence was comparable to the general population. Conclusions: Dutch patients with PKU on long-term dietary treatment have a near normal nutrient status. Supplementation of micronutrients of which deficiency may be deleterious (e.g., vitamin D and selenium) should be considered. BMD warrants further investigation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.