Little is known about the genomic abnormalities of squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) of the vulva and how they correlate with gene expression. We determined the genomic and expression profiles of 15 such SCC using karyotyping, DNA ploidy analysis, arrayCGH, and expression arrays. Four of the five cases with clonal chromosomal aberrations found by G-banding showed highly abnormal karyotypes with multiple rearrangements. The imbalances scored by arrayCGH mapped to different chromosomes with losses being more common than gains. Frequent losses were scored from 3p and 8p whereas gains were frequent from 3q and 8q (loss of 8p with concomitant gain of 8q mostly occurred via 8q isochromosome formation). This is the first study of vulvar tumors using arrayCGH, and some frequent imbalances could be defined precisely. Of particular note were the sometimes large, sometimes small deletions of 3p and 9p which had minute areas in 3p14 and 9p23 as minimal commonly deleted regions. FHIT (3p14) and PTPRD (9p23) are the only genes here. They were both lost in seven cases, including homozygous losses of PTPRD in four tumors. Using qPCR we could demonstrate deregulation of the FHIT gene in tumor cells. Hence, this gene is likely to play a pathogenetic role in vulvar SCC tumorigenesis. Expression array analyses also identified a number of other genes whose expression profile was altered. Notable among the downregulated genes were MAL (in 2q11), KRT4 (in 12q13), and OLFM4 (in 13q14), whereas upregulated genes included SPRR2G (in 1q21.3) and S100A7A (in 1q21.3).

Screening the whole glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) genome for aberrations is a good starting point when looking for molecular markers that could potentially stratify patients according to prognosis and optimal treatment. We investigated 80 primary untreated GBM using both G‐banding analysis and high‐resolution comparative genomic hybridization (HR‐CGH). Abnormal karyotypes were found in 83% of the tumors. The most common numerical chromosome aberrations were +7, −10, −13, −14, −15, +20, and −22. Structural abnormalities most commonly involved chromosomes 1 and 3, and the short arm of chromosome 9. HR‐CGH verified these findings and revealed additional frequent losses at 1p34‐36, 6q22‐27, and 19q12‐13 and gains of 3q26 and 12q13‐15. Although most karyotypes and gain/loss patterns were complex, there was also a distinct subset of tumors displaying simple karyotypic changes only. There was a statistically significant association between trisomy 7 and monosomy 10, and also between +7/−10 as putative primary aberrations and secondary losses of 1p, 9p, 13q, and 22q. The low number of tumors in the rarer histological tumor subgroups precludes definite conclusions, but there did not seem to be any clear‐cut cytogenetic‐pathological correlations, perhaps with the exception of ring chromosomes in giant cell glioblastomas. Our findings demonstrate that although GBM is a pathogenetically very heterogeneous group of diseases, distinct genomic aberration patterns exist. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

The current classification of diffuse low-grade gliomas is based mainly on histopathological criteria, which cannot accurately predict the highly variable clinical course observed in patients with such tumors. In an attempt to increase pathogenetic understanding of these tumors, we investigated 38 WHO Grade II astrocytomas, oligodendrogliomas, and oligoastrocytomas using a combination of G-band chromosome analysis and high-resolution comparative genomic hybridization (HR-CGH). Abnormal karyotypes were found in 41% of tumors. Karyotypes of astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas were near-diploid whereas oligoastrocytomas also displayed near-tetraploid clones. The most common aberrations were losses of chromosomes X, Y, 3, 4, 6, and 11 and gains of chromosomes 8 and 12. The only recurrent structural rearrangement was del(6)(q21). HR-CGH analysis verified karyotyping findings but also revealed frequent losses at 1p, 17q, and 19q and gains of 7q, 10p, 11q, and 20p. Among the tumors were two gemistocytic astrocytomas, a subgroup of diffuse astrocytomas with a particular predisposition for progression but not studied cytogenetically before; one showed a near-diploid, complex karyotype with structural aberrations of chromosomes 1, 3, and 11 whereas both displayed simple aberrations including loss of 11p by HR-CGH. Our findings suggest that within diffuse low-grade gliomas are genetically distinct entities that do not fit the currently used classification. In addition, tumors with complex chromosomal aberrations had a higher tendency for aggressive tumor behavior (shorter progression-free survival) than tumors displaying simple aberrations only (P = 0.07). This could help identify genetic subsets of patients with low-grade glioma who might benefit from early antineoplastic therapy.