Microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF) is the master regulator of the melanocyte lineage. To understand how MITF regulates transcription, we used tandem affinity purification and mass spectrometry to define a comprehensive MITF interactome identifying novel cofactors involved in transcription, DNA replication and repair, and chromatin organisation. We show that MITF interacts with a PBAF chromatin remodelling complex comprising BRG1 and CHD7. BRG1 is essential for melanoma cell proliferation in vitro and for normal melanocyte development in vivo. MITF and SOX10 actively recruit BRG1 to a set of MITF-associated regulatory elements (MAREs) at active enhancers. Combinations of MITF, SOX10, TFAP2A, and YY1 bind between two BRG1-occupied nucleosomes thus defining both a signature of transcription factors essential for the melanocyte lineage and a specific chromatin organisation of the regulatory elements they occupy. BRG1 also regulates the dynamics of MITF genomic occupancy. MITF-BRG1 interplay thus plays an essential role in transcription regulation in melanoma.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.06857.001

Mutations in the gene encoding transcription factor TFAP2A result in pigmentation anomalies in model organisms and premature hair graying in humans. However, the pleiotropic functions of TFAP2A and its redundantly-acting paralogs have made the precise contribution of TFAP2-type activity to melanocyte differentiation unclear. Defining this contribution may help to explain why TFAP2A expression is reduced in advanced-stage melanoma compared to benign nevi. To identify genes with TFAP2A-dependent expression in melanocytes, we profile zebrafish tissue and mouse melanocytes deficient in Tfap2a, and find that expression of a small subset of genes underlying pigmentation phenotypes is TFAP2A-dependent, including Dct, Mc1r, Mlph, and Pmel. We then conduct TFAP2A ChIP-seq in mouse and human melanocytes and find that a much larger subset of pigmentation genes is associated with active regulatory elements bound by TFAP2A. These elements are also frequently bound by MITF, which is considered the “master regulator” of melanocyte development. For example, the promoter of TRPM1 is bound by both TFAP2A and MITF, and we show that the activity of a minimal TRPM1 promoter is lost upon deletion of the TFAP2A binding sites. However, the expression of Trpm1 is not TFAP2A-dependent, implying that additional TFAP2 paralogs function redundantly to drive melanocyte differentiation, which is consistent with previous results from zebrafish. Paralogs Tfap2a and Tfap2b are both expressed in mouse melanocytes, and we show that mouse embryos with Wnt1-Cre-mediated deletion of Tfap2a and Tfap2b in the neural crest almost completely lack melanocytes but retain neural crest-derived sensory ganglia. These results suggest that TFAP2 paralogs, like MITF, are also necessary for induction of the melanocyte lineage. Finally, we observe a genetic interaction between tfap2a and mitfa in zebrafish, but find that artificially elevating expression of tfap2a does not increase levels of melanin in mitfa hypomorphic or loss-of-function mutants. Collectively, these results show that TFAP2 paralogs, operating alongside lineage-specific transcription factors such as MITF, directly regulate effectors of terminal differentiation in melanocytes. In addition, they suggest that TFAP2A activity, like MITF activity, has the potential to modulate the phenotype of melanoma cells.

SUMMARY Molecular signatures specific to particular tumor types are required to design treatments for resistant tumors. However, it remains unclear whether tumors and corresponding cell lines used for drug development share such signatures. We developed similarity core analysis (SCA), a universal and unsupervised computational framework for extracting core molecular features common to tumors and cell lines. We applied SCA to mRNA/miRNA expression data from various sources, comparing melanoma cell lines and metastases. The signature obtained was associated with phenotypic characteristics in vitro, and the core genes CAPN3 and TRIM63 were implicated in melanoma cell migration/invasion. About 90% of the melanoma signature genes belong to an intrinsic network of transcription factors governing neural development (TFAP2A, DLX2, ALX1, MITF, PAX3, SOX10, LEF1, and GAS7) and miRNAs (211-5p, 221-3p, and 10a-5p). The SCA signature effectively discriminated between two subpopulations of melanoma patients differing in overall survival, and classified MEKi/BRAFi-resistant and -sensitive melanoma cell lines.

Summary MITF governs multiple steps in the development of melanocytes, including specification from neural crest, growth, survival, and terminal differentiation. In addition, the level of MITF activity determines the phenotype adopted by melanoma cells, whether invasive, proliferative, or differentiated. However, MITF does not act alone. Here, we review literature on the transcription factors that co-regulate MITF-dependent genes. ChIP-seq studies have indicated that the transcription factors SOX10, YY1, and TFAP2A co-occupy subsets of regulatory elements bound by MITF in melanocytes. Analyses at single loci also support roles for LEF1, RB1, IRF4, and PAX3 acting in combination with MITF, while sequence motif analyses suggest that additional transcription factors colocalize with MITF at many melanocyte-specific regulatory elements. However, the precise biochemical functions of each of these MITF collaborators and their contributions to gene expression remain to be elucidated. Analogous to the transcriptional networks in morphogen-patterned tissues during embryogenesis, we anticipate that the level of MITF activity is controlled not only by the concentration of activated MITF, but also by additional transcription factors that either quantitatively or qualitatively influence the expression of MITF-target genes.

In developing melanocytes and in melanoma cells, multiple paralogs of the Activating-enhancer-binding Protein 2 family of transcription factors (TFAP2) contribute to expression of genes encoding pigmentation regulators, but their interaction with Microphthalmia transcription factor (MITF), a master regulator of these cells, is unclear. Supporting the model that Tfap2 facilitates MITF’s ability to activate expression of pigmentation genes, single-cell seq analysis of zebrafish embryos revealed that pigmentation genes are only expressed in the subset of mitfa-expressing cells that also express Tfap2 paralogs. To test this model in SK-MEL-28 melanoma cells we deleted the two TFAP2 paralogs with highest expression, TFAP2A and TFAP2C, creating TFAP2 knockout (TFAP2-KO) cells. We then assessed gene expression, chromatin accessibility, binding of TFAP2A and of MITF, and the chromatin marks H3K27Ac and H3K27Me3 which are characteristic of active enhancers and silenced chromatin, respectively. Integrated analyses of these datasets indicate TFAP2 paralogs directly activate enhancers near genes enriched for roles in pigmentation and proliferation, and directly repress enhancers near genes enriched for roles in cell adhesion. Consistently, compared to WT cells, TFAP2-KO cells proliferate less and adhere to one another more. TFAP2 paralogs and MITF co-operatively activate a subset of enhancers, with the latter necessary for MITF binding and chromatin accessibility. By contrast, TFAP2 paralogs and MITF do not appear to co-operatively inhibit enhancers. These studies reveal a mechanism by which TFAP2 profoundly influences the set of genes activated by MITF, and thereby the phenotype of pigment cells and melanoma cells.

The phenotypic state of melanoma cells is determined by the activity of microphthalmia‐associated transcription factor (MITF). Activating‐enhancer binding protein 2 (TFAP2) family members co‐regulate a subset of the genes regulated by MITF, but the respective functions of TFAP2 paralogs and MITF are unclear. Evidence that TFAP2 paralogs can bind nucleosomes, and that MITF binds to Brg1, support a model wherein TFAP2 paralogs bind closed chromatin and facilitate access to MITF which in turn recruits chromatin remodelers. To test this model we generated TFAP2A/TFAP2C double knockout SK‐MEL‐28 cells and monitored binding sites of TFAP2A and of MITF, and marks of open chromatin (ATAC‐seq), active chromatin (H3K27Ac), repressed chromatin (H3K27me3) and active promoters (H3K4me3). Integration of the data revealed that, consistent with the model, at a large subset of loci bound by both MITF and TFAP2A in wild‐type cells, MITF binding, H3K27AC and ATAC‐seq signals were significantly reduced in TFAP2 knockout cells. Unexpectedly, at a subset of them, MITF binding but not H3K27AC or ATAC‐seq signals were reduced, implying distinct mechanisms at such loci. RNA‐seq profiles of TFAP2 knockout and MITF knockout SK‐MEL‐28 cells showed that the subset MITF‐dependent genes that is also TFAP2‐dependent is enriched for those regulating pigmentation, while the subset that is TFAP2‐independent is not. Consistently, embryonic melanophores in zebrafish tfap2a/tfap2e double mutants had strongly reduced expression of genes in the first subset but not the latter. These findings illustrate how the presence of a specific pioneer factor affects the target genes of a pleiotropic transcriptional activator, and suggest how TFAP2 paralogs may influence melanoma progression.

Transcription factors in the Activating-enhancer-binding Protein 2 (TFAP2) family redundantly regulate gene expression in melanocytes and melanoma. Previous ChIP-seq experiments indicate that TFAP2A and Microphthalmia-associated Transcription Factor (MITF), a master regulator in these cell types, co-activate enhancers of genes promoting pigmentation. Evidence that TFAP2 paralogs can serve as pioneer factors supports the possibility that TFAP2 facilitates MITF binding at co-bound enhancers, although this model has not been tested. In addition, while MITF and TFAP2 paralogs both appear to repress genes that promote invasion, whether they do so by co-repressing enhancers is unknown. To address these questions we evaluated gene expression, chromatin accessibility, TFAP2A and MITF binding, and chromatin marks characteristic of active enhancers in SK-MEL-28 melanoma cells that were wild-type or deleted of the two TFAP2 paralogs with highest expression, TFAP2A and TFAP2C (i.e., TFAP2-KO cells). Integrated analyses revealed distinct subsets of enhancers bound by TFAP2A in WT cells that are inactivated and activated, respectively, in TFAP2-KO cells. At enhancers bound by both MITF and TFAP2A, MITF is generally lost in TFAP2A/TFAP2C double mutants, but not vice versa, implying TFAP2 pioneers chromatin access for MITF. There is a strong correlation between the sets of genes inhibited by MITF and TFAP2, although we did not find evidence that TFAP2 and MITF inhibit enhancers cooperatively. The findings imply that MITF and TFAP2 paralogs cooperatively affect the melanoma phenotype.

No abstract